USPTO serial 79038252
DITTEL
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
Reg. 3583482Status 706Registered
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- Mar 3, 2009
- Examiner
- SPRUILL, DARRYL M
- Law office
- GENERIC WEB UPDATE
What this means
This trademark is registered with the USPTO. Monitoring new filings can help you catch lookalike marks early.
Need help with DITTEL?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Max Vern
Max Vern Amster, Rothstein & Ebenstein LLP405 Lexington AvenueNew York, NY 10174UNITED STATESGoods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 007 | Spindles of machine tools and metal working machines and parts thereof; devices and apparatus for the mechanical and/or hydraulic balancing of rotational bodies, namely, balancing or process monitoring system comprising balancing heads and operating software sold therewith for metal working machine tools and metal working machines; balancing heads or rings for use with machine tools and metal working machines and parts thereof; hydro-balancing apparatus and instruments used on grinding machines | ACTIVE | — |
| 009 | Process monitoring and balancing electronics apparatus and instruments comprising of transceivers, receivers, data processors, power units and remote controls; data processors, in particular in the field of evaluation of acoustic emission of machines and machine tools; acoustic emission sensors; apparatus and instruments comprising of transceivers, receivers, data processors, power units and remote controls for automatically balancing machine spindles and/or visualizing and monitoring grinding processes on grinding machines; measuring, monitoring, signalling, checking or supervising and control apparatus and instruments, in particular sensors, revolution counters, in particular for machine tools and metal working machines; apparatus for recording, evaluating, receiving, transmitting and transferring of data, electronic current, sound and/or images; [ electronic data loggers for spindles; ] microprocessors; semiconductor power elements; integrated circuits; electric cables; computer software for process monitoring and balancing, namely, for process monitoring of the acoustic emission of machines and machine tools, for monitoring grinding processes on grinding machines and for balancing machine spindles and rotating elements of machines and machine tools; [ airborne transceivers; VHF/AM hand-held transceivers; transceivers for instrument panel installation, in particular in airplanes, helicopters, ground vehicles and ships; VHF/AM radio apparatus and parts thereof ] | ACTIVE | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
- Other trademarks owned by Dittel Messtechnik GmbH
- Other trademarks owned by Walter Dittel GmbH
- Other trademarks owned by Walter Dittel GmbH
- Other trademarks owned by Walter Dittel GmbH
- Other trademarks in Class 007
- Other trademarks in Class 009
- Similar marks named DITTEL
- Recently changed USPTO trademarks
- Recently filed trademarks
- Browse all trademark records
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Mar 3, 2023 | TCCA | TEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED | — |
| Mar 3, 2023 | ECDR | TEAS CHANGE OF DOMESTIC REPRESENTATIVES ADDRESS | — |
| Mar 3, 2023 | ARAA | ATTORNEY/DOM.REP.REVOKED AND/OR APPOINTED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Mar 3, 2023 | REAP | TEAS REVOKE/APP/CHANGE ADDR OF ATTY/DOM REP RECEIVED | — |
| Jan 9, 2020 | INNP | PARTIAL INVALIDATION PROCESSED BY THE IB | — |
| Nov 21, 2019 | INPS | PARTIAL INVALIDATION OF REG EXT PROTECTION SENT TO IB | — |
| Nov 20, 2019 | INPC | INVALIDATION PROCESSED | — |
| Oct 28, 2019 | INPR | PARTIAL INVALIDATION OF REG EXT PROTECTION CREATED | — |
| Mar 29, 2019 | NREP | NEW REPRESENTATIVE AT IB RECEIVED | — |
| Feb 28, 2019 | NA71 | NOTICE OF ACCEPTANCE OF SEC. 71 - E-MAILED | — |
| Feb 28, 2019 | 71AG | REGISTERED-SEC.71 ACCEPTED | — |
| Feb 25, 2019 | ES71 | TEAS SECTION 71 RECEIVED | — |
| Mar 3, 2018 | REM4 | COURTESY REMINDER - SEC. 71 (10-YR) E-MAILED | — |
| Mar 9, 2017 | RNWL | INTERNATIONAL REGISTRATION RENEWED | — |
| Feb 27, 2015 | NA75 | NOTICE OF ACCEPTANCE OF SEC. 71 & 15 - E-MAILED | — |
| Feb 26, 2015 | C75A | REGISTERED - SEC. 71 ACCEPTED & SEC. 15 ACK. | — |
| Feb 25, 2015 | APRE | CASE ASSIGNED TO POST REGISTRATION PARALEGAL | — |
| Feb 24, 2015 | ES75 | TEAS SECTION 71 & 15 RECEIVED | — |
| Jan 11, 2013 | FINO | FINAL DECISION TRANSACTION PROCESSED BY IB | — |
| Oct 15, 2009 | CHLD | CHANGE OF OWNER RECEIVED FROM IB | — |
| Jun 9, 2009 | FICS | FINAL DISPOSITION NOTICE SENT TO IB | — |
| Jun 9, 2009 | FIMP | FINAL DISPOSITION PROCESSED | — |
| Jun 3, 2009 | FICR | FINAL DISPOSITION NOTICE CREATED, TO BE SENT TO IB | — |
| Mar 3, 2009 | R.PR | REGISTERED-PRINCIPAL REGISTER | Your trademark is registered on the Principal Register — the strongest form of federal trademark protection. You may use the ® symbol for the covered goods and services. Maintenance filings (Section 8 and renewals) are required to keep the registration alive. |
| Dec 16, 2008 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| Dec 5, 2008 | OPNX | NOTIFICATION OF POSSIBLE OPPOSITION - PROCESSED BY IB | — |
| Nov 26, 2008 | NPUB | NOTICE OF PUBLICATION | — |
| Nov 20, 2008 | OPNS | NOTIFICATION OF POSSIBLE OPPOSITION SENT TO IB | — |
| Nov 20, 2008 | OPNR | NOTIFICATION OF POSSIBLE OPPOSITION CREATED, TO BE SENT TO IB | — |
| Nov 13, 2008 | PREV | LAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED | — |
| Nov 6, 2008 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Nov 6, 2008 | XAEC | EXAMINER'S AMENDMENT ENTERED | — |
| Nov 6, 2008 | GNEN | NOTIFICATION OF EXAMINERS AMENDMENT E-MAILED | — |
| Nov 6, 2008 | GNEA | EXAMINERS AMENDMENT E-MAILED | — |
| Nov 6, 2008 | CNEA | EXAMINERS AMENDMENT -WRITTEN | — |
| Sep 17, 2008 | GNS1 | NOTIFICATION OF SUBSEQUENT FINAL EMAILED | — |
| Sep 17, 2008 | GNCF | CONTINUATION OF FINAL REFUSAL E-MAILED | — |
| Sep 17, 2008 | CNCF | ACTION CONTINUING A FINAL - COMPLETED | — |
| Sep 9, 2008 | ZZZX | PREVIOUS ALLOWANCE COUNT WITHDRAWN | — |
| Sep 8, 2008 | PBCR | WITHDRAWN FROM PUB - OG REVIEW QUERY | — |
| Aug 28, 2008 | PREV | LAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED | — |
| Aug 25, 2008 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| Aug 15, 2008 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Aug 13, 2008 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Aug 13, 2008 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Aug 13, 2008 | ERFR | TEAS REQUEST FOR RECONSIDERATION RECEIVED | — |
| Apr 24, 2008 | GNS1 | NOTIFICATION OF SUBSEQUENT FINAL EMAILED | — |
| Apr 24, 2008 | GNCF | CONTINUATION OF FINAL REFUSAL E-MAILED | — |
| Apr 24, 2008 | CNCF | ACTION CONTINUING A FINAL - COMPLETED | — |
| Apr 2, 2008 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Apr 2, 2008 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Apr 2, 2008 | ERFR | TEAS REQUEST FOR RECONSIDERATION RECEIVED | — |
| Jan 13, 2008 | GNFN | NOTIFICATION OF FINAL REFUSAL EMAILED | — |
| Jan 13, 2008 | GNFR | FINAL REFUSAL E-MAILED | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| Jan 13, 2008 | CNFR | FINAL REFUSAL WRITTEN | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| Dec 20, 2007 | TCCA | TEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED | — |
| Dec 20, 2007 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Dec 20, 2007 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Dec 20, 2007 | TROA | TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Jul 20, 2007 | RFNT | REFUSAL PROCESSED BY IB | — |
| Jun 28, 2007 | RFCS | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED - REFUSAL SENT TO IB | — |
| Jun 28, 2007 | RFRR | REFUSAL PROCESSED BY MPU | — |
| Jun 28, 2007 | RFCR | NON-FINAL ACTION (IB REFUSAL) PREPARED FOR REVIEW | — |
| Jun 27, 2007 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Jun 15, 2007 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Jun 15, 2007 | NWAP | NEW APPLICATION ENTERED | — |
| Jun 14, 2007 | REPR | SN ASSIGNED FOR SECT 66A APPL FROM IB | — |