Drawing for KERAKOLL DESIGN SURFACES

USPTO serial 79038258

KERAKOLL DESIGN SURFACES

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Status 402
Filing date
Status date
Registration date
—
Examiner
FAIRBANKS, RONALD L
Law office
TTAB

What this means

This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.

Need help with KERAKOLL DESIGN SURFACES?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Owner

Attorney of record

The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.

Howard N. Aronson

CATHY SHORE SIROTIN LACHENBACH SIEGELl LLPLACKENBACH SIEGEL BUILDINGONE CHASE ROADSCARSDALE, NY 10583

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
001Adhesives for laying floorings and coverings of ceramic and natural stone tiles, in particular adhesives in a premixed powder with a hydraulic binder base, unprocessed synthetic resins, used for laying floorings and coverings of ceramic and natural stone tilesABANDONED—
002Varnishes, varnishes for wooden flooringABANDONED—
019Non-metallic building materials, namely, ready-made binders and screeds for making a floor bed before laying flooring; premixed mortars for restoring concrete and masonryABANDONED—

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

DateCodeEventWhat it means
Jul 15, 2017DENANOTIFICATION OF EFFECT OF CANCELLATION OF INTL REG E-MAILED—
Jul 14, 2017DETHDEATH OF INTERNATIONAL REGISTRATION—
Dec 5, 2014FINTFINAL DECISION TRANSACTION PROCESSED BY IB—
Nov 18, 2014FICSFINAL DISPOSITION NOTICE SENT TO IB—
Nov 18, 2014FICRFINAL DISPOSITION NOTICE CREATED, TO BE SENT TO IB—
Nov 18, 2013MAB4ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - INTER PARTES DECISION—
Nov 18, 2013ABN4ABANDONMENT - AFTER INTER PARTES DECISION—
Nov 18, 2013OP.TOPPOSITION TERMINATED NO. 999999—
Nov 18, 2013OP.DOPPOSITION DISMISSED NO. 999999—
May 9, 2008RFNTREFUSAL PROCESSED BY IB—
Apr 21, 2008OP.IOPPOSITION INSTITUTED NO. 999999—
Apr 18, 2008OPNSOPPOSITION NOTICE (IB REFUSAL) SENT TO IB—
Apr 18, 2008OPNCOPPOSITION NOTICE (IB REFUSAL) CREATED—
Apr 10, 2008ETOFEXTENSION OF TIME TO OPPOSE RECEIVED—
Mar 11, 2008PUBOPUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITIONYour mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance.
Feb 20, 2008NPUBNOTICE OF PUBLICATION—
Feb 1, 2008PREVLAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED—
Feb 1, 2008ALIEASSIGNED TO LIE—
Dec 20, 2007CNSAAPPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER—
Dec 19, 2007TEMETEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED—
Dec 19, 2007CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Dec 19, 2007TROATEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVEDThis event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action.
Dec 19, 2007ARAAATTORNEY/DOM.REP.REVOKED AND/OR APPOINTEDThis event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action.
Dec 19, 2007REAPTEAS REVOKE/APP/CHANGE ADDR OF ATTY/DOM REP RECEIVED—
Jul 13, 2007RFNTREFUSAL PROCESSED BY IB—
Jun 26, 2007RFCSNON-FINAL ACTION MAILED - REFUSAL SENT TO IB—
Jun 26, 2007RFRRREFUSAL PROCESSED BY MPU—
Jun 26, 2007RFCRNON-FINAL ACTION (IB REFUSAL) PREPARED FOR REVIEW—
Jun 25, 2007CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION WRITTENA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Jun 15, 2007DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
Jun 15, 2007NWAPNEW APPLICATION ENTERED—
Jun 14, 2007REPRSN ASSIGNED FOR SECT 66A APPL FROM IB—

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance