Drawing for BROTHERS

USPTO serial 79038314

BROTHERS

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Filing date
Status date
Registration date
—
Examiner
KING, CHRISTINA B
Law office
TMEG LAW OFFICE 109 - EXAMINING ATTORNEY ASSIGNED

What this means

These status codes mean the trademark application is abandoned and no longer pending. Common reasons include missing an Office Action response (600), filing without a valid basis (602), express abandonment by the applicant (604), or failure to respond to an examiner's inquiry (618). Revival may be possible in limited circumstances. If abandonment was unintentional, consult counsel about a petition to revive. Otherwise file a new application if protection is still needed.

Status 602: These status codes mean the trademark application is abandoned and no longer pending. Common reasons include missing an Office Action response (600), filing without a valid basis (602), express abandonment by the applicant (604), or failure to respond to an examiner's inquiry (618). Revival may be possible in limited circumstances.

Need help with BROTHERS?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Owner

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
008Hoes (hand tools); nail clippers (electric or non-electric); screwdrivers; glaziers' diamonds (parts of hand tools); scissors; vegetable knives; cleavers; pruning shears; swords; table cutlery (knives, forks and spoons)ACTIVE—

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

DateCodeEventWhat it means
Sep 4, 2025ADCHCHANGE OF NAME/ADDRESS REC'D FROM IB—
Mar 30, 2024ADCHCHANGE OF NAME/ADDRESS REC'D FROM IB—
Jan 26, 2024CHLDCHANGE OF OWNER RECEIVED FROM IB—
Dec 23, 2023NREPNEW REPRESENTATIVE AT IB RECEIVED—
Nov 9, 2017RNWLINTERNATIONAL REGISTRATION RENEWED—
May 22, 2009FINTFINAL DECISION TRANSACTION PROCESSED BY IB—
Apr 3, 2009FICSFINAL DISPOSITION NOTICE SENT TO IB—
Apr 3, 2009FICRFINAL DISPOSITION NOTICE CREATED, TO BE SENT TO IB—
Dec 13, 2008OPNXNOTIFICATION OF POSSIBLE OPPOSITION - PROCESSED BY IB—
Nov 27, 2008OPNSNOTIFICATION OF POSSIBLE OPPOSITION SENT TO IB—
Nov 27, 2008OPNRNOTIFICATION OF POSSIBLE OPPOSITION CREATED, TO BE SENT TO IB—
Apr 3, 2008MAB2ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - FAILURE TO RESPONDThe trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time.
Apr 3, 2008ABN2ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSEThe trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time.
Sep 1, 2007RFNTREFUSAL PROCESSED BY IB—
Aug 15, 2007RFCSNON-FINAL ACTION MAILED - REFUSAL SENT TO IB—
Aug 15, 2007RFRRREFUSAL PROCESSED BY MPU—
Aug 15, 2007RFCRNON-FINAL ACTION (IB REFUSAL) PREPARED FOR REVIEW—
Aug 14, 2007CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION WRITTENA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Aug 7, 2007DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
Jun 22, 2007NWAPNEW APPLICATION ENTERED—
Jun 21, 2007REPRSN ASSIGNED FOR SECT 66A APPL FROM IB—

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance