USPTO serial 79038327
DESERT
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
Reg. 3480818Status 706Registered
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- Aug 5, 2008
- Examiner
- MILLER, DAVID S
- Law office
- GENERIC WEB UPDATE
What this means
This trademark is registered with the USPTO. Monitoring new filings can help you catch lookalike marks early.
Need help with DESERT?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Craig A. Fieschko
Craig A. Fieschko DeWitt Ross & Stevens SC2 E. Mifflin St., 6th FloorMadison, WI 53703-2865UNITED STATESGoods and services
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
- Other trademarks owned by Desert Eco Systems Pty Ltd
- Other trademarks owned by Desert Eco Systems Pty Ltd
- Other trademarks owned by Desert Eco Systems Pty Ltd
- Other trademarks in Class 005
- Other trademarks in Class 011
- Similar marks named DESERT
- Recently changed USPTO trademarks
- Recently filed trademarks
- Browse all trademark records
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Aug 27, 2018 | NA71 | NOTICE OF ACCEPTANCE OF SEC. 71 - E-MAILED | — |
| Aug 27, 2018 | 71AG | REGISTERED-SEC.71 ACCEPTED | — |
| Aug 22, 2018 | APRE | CASE ASSIGNED TO POST REGISTRATION PARALEGAL | — |
| Aug 1, 2018 | ES71 | TEAS SECTION 71 RECEIVED | — |
| Aug 5, 2017 | REM4 | COURTESY REMINDER - SEC. 71 (10-YR) E-MAILED | — |
| May 25, 2017 | RNWL | INTERNATIONAL REGISTRATION RENEWED | — |
| Aug 19, 2014 | NA75 | NOTICE OF ACCEPTANCE OF SEC. 71 & 15 - E-MAILED | — |
| Aug 18, 2014 | C75A | REGISTERED - SEC. 71 ACCEPTED & SEC. 15 ACK. | — |
| Aug 18, 2014 | APRE | CASE ASSIGNED TO POST REGISTRATION PARALEGAL | — |
| Aug 1, 2014 | ES75 | TEAS SECTION 71 & 15 RECEIVED | — |
| Dec 30, 2012 | FINO | FINAL DECISION TRANSACTION PROCESSED BY IB | — |
| Nov 21, 2008 | FICS | FINAL DISPOSITION NOTICE SENT TO IB | — |
| Nov 21, 2008 | FIMP | FINAL DISPOSITION PROCESSED | — |
| Nov 5, 2008 | FICR | FINAL DISPOSITION NOTICE CREATED, TO BE SENT TO IB | — |
| Aug 5, 2008 | R.PR | REGISTERED-PRINCIPAL REGISTER | Your trademark is registered on the Principal Register — the strongest form of federal trademark protection. You may use the ® symbol for the covered goods and services. Maintenance filings (Section 8 and renewals) are required to keep the registration alive. |
| May 20, 2008 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| May 1, 2008 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Apr 30, 2008 | NPUB | NOTICE OF PUBLICATION | — |
| Apr 18, 2008 | CORV | REVIEW OF CORRESPONDENCE COMPLETE | — |
| Apr 14, 2008 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Apr 11, 2008 | PREV | LAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED | — |
| Apr 10, 2008 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Apr 9, 2008 | ACEC | AMENDMENT FROM APPLICANT ENTERED | — |
| Apr 9, 2008 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Apr 8, 2008 | FAXX | FAX RECEIVED | — |
| Apr 8, 2008 | FAXX | FAX RECEIVED | — |
| Feb 26, 2008 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Feb 25, 2008 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Feb 7, 2008 | ACEC | AMENDMENT FROM APPLICANT ENTERED | — |
| Feb 7, 2008 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Feb 7, 2008 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| Dec 31, 2007 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Dec 20, 2007 | FAXX | FAX RECEIVED | — |
| Aug 2, 2007 | RFNT | REFUSAL PROCESSED BY IB | — |
| Jul 13, 2007 | RFCS | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED - REFUSAL SENT TO IB | — |
| Jul 13, 2007 | RFRR | REFUSAL PROCESSED BY MPU | — |
| Jul 13, 2007 | RFCR | NON-FINAL ACTION (IB REFUSAL) PREPARED FOR REVIEW | — |
| Jul 12, 2007 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Jul 7, 2007 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Jun 25, 2007 | NWAP | NEW APPLICATION ENTERED | — |
| Jun 21, 2007 | LIMS | LIMITATION OF GOODS/SERVICES FROM IB ENTERED | — |
| Jun 21, 2007 | REPR | SN ASSIGNED FOR SECT 66A APPL FROM IB | — |