USPTO serial 79038355
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Kyle T. Peterson
Kyle T. Peterson PATTERSON, THUENTE, SKAAR & CHRISTENSEN, P.A.4800 IDS CENTER80th South 8th StreetMinneapolis, MN 55402| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 007 | Power tools, namely, battery operated and electric hand drills and drivers; rotary hammer drills; grinders including angle grinders; power saws, including circular, reciprocating and jig saws, mitre saws including compound mitre saws; power saw benches; power electric sanders, including finishing, orbital, random, delta and belt sanders; electric planers; power tools, namely, routers; power gardening tools, namely, string trimmers, hedge trimmers, blowers, sweepers, pruners, chain saws, edgers and cultivators; power tool accessories, namely, drill bits and screw driver bits; power saw blades; grinding wheels and cutter wheels; abrasive sheets, pads and belts for power electric sanders; polishing and buffing accessories for power sanders, namely, polishing bonnets, polishing sponges, backing pads, buffing wheels and polishing pads; electric planer blades and router bits; attachments for hand-held power drills for enabling hand-held power drills to be used as a drill press; attachments for use with hand-held power drills for gauging drill depth into a work piece; laser or mechanical guide attachments for hand-held power saws for aligning the power saw when cutting a work piece; light attachments for hand-held power drills for illuminating a work piece; power gardening tool accessories, namely, trimmer, edger and saw blades; power operated blowers and dust collection bags sold therewith; electrical appliances for preparing drinks and for mixing, slicing and blending food, namely, electric food blender, electric food chopper, electric food slicer and electric food mixer | SECTION 71 - CANCELLED | — |
| 009 | Electric control systems for use with machine tools, power tools, hand held power tools, power gardening tools; microprocessor based control systems comprising a user input interface, a printed circuit board, a microprocessor, a memory device, a power source and an actuator or sensor or both and actuator and sensor for use with machine tools, power tools, hand held power tools and power gardening tools | SECTION 71 - CANCELLED | — |
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Aug 3, 2017 | DENC | NOTIFICATION OF EFFECT OF CANCELLATION OF INTL REG MAILED | — |
| Aug 3, 2017 | DETH | DEATH OF INTERNATIONAL REGISTRATION | — |
| Mar 17, 2017 | INNT | TOTAL INVALIDATION PROCESSED BY THE IB | — |
| Mar 7, 2016 | INTS | TOTAL INVALIDATION OF REG EXT PROTECTION SENT TO IB | — |
| Mar 7, 2016 | INPC | INVALIDATION PROCESSED | — |
| Jan 1, 2016 | INTR | TOTAL INVALIDATION OF REG EXT PROTECTION CREATED | — |
| May 1, 2015 | C71T | CANCELLED SECTION 71 | — |
| Jan 6, 2013 | FINO | FINAL DECISION TRANSACTION PROCESSED BY IB | — |
| Dec 21, 2012 | NREP | NEW REPRESENTATIVE AT IB RECEIVED | — |
| Jan 16, 2009 | FICS | FINAL DISPOSITION NOTICE SENT TO IB | — |
| Jan 16, 2009 | FIMP | FINAL DISPOSITION PROCESSED | — |
| Dec 30, 2008 | FICR | FINAL DISPOSITION NOTICE CREATED, TO BE SENT TO IB | — |
| Sep 30, 2008 | R.PR | REGISTERED-PRINCIPAL REGISTER | Your trademark is registered on the Principal Register — the strongest form of federal trademark protection. You may use the ® symbol for the covered goods and services. Maintenance filings (Section 8 and renewals) are required to keep the registration alive. |
| Jul 15, 2008 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| Jun 25, 2008 | NPUB | NOTICE OF PUBLICATION | — |
| Jun 9, 2008 | PREV | LAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED | — |
| Jun 9, 2008 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| May 16, 2008 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| May 16, 2008 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| May 16, 2008 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| May 16, 2008 | TROA | TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| May 16, 2008 | PETG | PETITION TO REVIVE-GRANTED | — |
| May 16, 2008 | PROA | TEAS PETITION TO REVIVE RECEIVED | — |
| Apr 3, 2008 | CORR | CORRECTION FROM IB ENTERED - NO REVIEW REQUIRED | — |
| Mar 27, 2008 | CRCV | CORRECTION TRANSACTION RECEIVED FROM IB | — |
| Nov 8, 2007 | ARAA | ATTORNEY/DOM.REP.REVOKED AND/OR APPOINTED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Nov 8, 2007 | REAP | TEAS REVOKE/APP/CHANGE ADDR OF ATTY/DOM REP RECEIVED | — |
| Nov 6, 2007 | CNFR | FINAL REFUSAL MAILED | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| Nov 5, 2007 | CNFR | FINAL REFUSAL WRITTEN | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| Oct 12, 2007 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Oct 12, 2007 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Oct 12, 2007 | TROA | TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Jul 26, 2007 | RFNT | REFUSAL PROCESSED BY IB | — |
| Jul 3, 2007 | RFCS | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED - REFUSAL SENT TO IB | — |
| Jul 3, 2007 | RFRR | REFUSAL PROCESSED BY MPU | — |
| Jul 3, 2007 | RFCR | NON-FINAL ACTION (IB REFUSAL) PREPARED FOR REVIEW | — |
| Jul 2, 2007 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Jun 25, 2007 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Jun 25, 2007 | NWAP | NEW APPLICATION ENTERED | — |
| Jun 21, 2007 | REPR | SN ASSIGNED FOR SECT 66A APPL FROM IB | — |