CopyMark Law Group
4.9/5
Drawing for BDV

USPTO serial 79038395

BDV

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Reg. 3445479Status 404
Filing date
Status date
Registration date
Jun 10, 2008
Examiner
BUONGIORNO, CHRISTOPHER L
Law office
PUBLICATION AND ISSUE SECTION

What this means

This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.

Need help with BDV?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Trademark Monitoring
(312) 319-4460
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Start a new application
(312) 319-4460

Owner

Attorney of record

The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.

GEORGE W. LEWIS

GEORGE W. LEWIS JACOBSON HOLMAN PLLC400 Seventh Street, N.W.Suite 600Washington, DC 20004

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
007metal working machines and tools, namely, lathes, milling machines, metal working machining centers; power-operated cutting tools, namely, drill heads, milling cutters being parts of machines, boring heads being boring machines, single point tools for lathes being parts of machines; tool holders being parts of metal working machinesSECTION 71 - CANCELLED—

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

DateCodeEventWhat it means
Sep 28, 2018DENCNOTIFICATION OF EFFECT OF CANCELLATION OF INTL REG MAILED—
Sep 28, 2018DETHDEATH OF INTERNATIONAL REGISTRATION—
Mar 10, 2016NREPNEW REPRESENTATIVE AT IB RECEIVED—
Oct 16, 2015INNTTOTAL INVALIDATION PROCESSED BY THE IB—
Sep 30, 2015XXSSGENERIC MADRID TRANSACTION SENT TO IB—
Sep 30, 2015XXCRGENERIC MADRID TRANSACTION CREATED—
Sep 16, 2015INTRTOTAL INVALIDATION OF REG EXT PROTECTION CREATED—
Jan 16, 2015C71TCANCELLED SECTION 71—
Dec 30, 2012FINOFINAL DECISION TRANSACTION PROCESSED BY IB—
Sep 29, 2008FICSFINAL DISPOSITION NOTICE SENT TO IB—
Sep 29, 2008FIMPFINAL DISPOSITION PROCESSED—
Sep 10, 2008FICRFINAL DISPOSITION NOTICE CREATED, TO BE SENT TO IB—
Jun 10, 2008R.PRREGISTERED-PRINCIPAL REGISTERYour trademark is registered on the Principal Register — the strongest form of federal trademark protection. You may use the ® symbol for the covered goods and services. Maintenance filings (Section 8 and renewals) are required to keep the registration alive.
Mar 25, 2008PUBOPUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITIONYour mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance.
Mar 5, 2008NPUBNOTICE OF PUBLICATION—
Feb 21, 2008PREVLAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED—
Feb 21, 2008ALIEASSIGNED TO LIE—
Jan 22, 2008CNSAAPPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER—
Dec 11, 2007ARAAATTORNEY/DOM.REP.REVOKED AND/OR APPOINTEDThis event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action.
Dec 11, 2007REAPTEAS REVOKE/APP/CHANGE ADDR OF ATTY/DOM REP RECEIVED—
Dec 11, 2007CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Dec 10, 2007CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION WRITTENA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Nov 15, 2007TEMETEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED—
Nov 14, 2007CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Nov 14, 2007TROATEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVEDThis event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action.
Jul 20, 2007RFNTREFUSAL PROCESSED BY IB—
Jun 28, 2007RFCSNON-FINAL ACTION MAILED - REFUSAL SENT TO IB—
Jun 28, 2007RFRRREFUSAL PROCESSED BY MPU—
Jun 28, 2007RFCRNON-FINAL ACTION (IB REFUSAL) PREPARED FOR REVIEW—
Jun 27, 2007CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION WRITTENA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Jun 22, 2007DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
Jun 22, 2007NWAPNEW APPLICATION ENTERED—
Jun 21, 2007LIMSLIMITATION OF GOODS/SERVICES FROM IB ENTERED—
Jun 21, 2007REPRSN ASSIGNED FOR SECT 66A APPL FROM IB—

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance