USPTO serial 79038405
ARANCIA
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
Status 402
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- KELLY, JOHN M
- Law office
- LAW OFFICE 117 - EXAMINING ATTORNEY ASSIGNED
What this means
This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.
Need help with ARANCIA?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
Goods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 024 | Woven and non-woven fabrics namely, fiberglass fabrics, fabric impervious to gases, water resistance fabrics, fabric of imitation of animal skins, all kinds of linings, filtering materials of textile, handkerchiefs of textile, textiles to remove make up, flags, signal flags, labels of textile | SECTION 70 - CANCELLED | — |
| 025 | Clothing made of all kinds of material except protective clothing, underclothing and outer clothing namely, clothing of knitted fabric, denim clothing, clothing of leather, clothing of paper, clothing for sport, bath clothes and beach clothes, underclothes, gloves (clothing), socks, footwear namely, shoes, high-topped boots, boots, slippers, bootees and parts thereof, sports shoes and studs thereof, parts of shoes namely, non-slipping devices for shoes, heelpieces for shoes, welts for shoes, shoe-uppers, headwear namely, headgears, hats, berets, caps, neck ties, bow ties, foulards, shawls, headscarves, sarongs, detachable collars, bandanas, muffs, arm bands, head bands, wrist bands, belts, suspenders, garter | SECTION 70 - CANCELLED | — |
| 035 | The bringing together of a variety of goods, enabling customers to conveniently view and purchase those goods | SECTION 70 - CANCELLED | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Dec 21, 2017 | UNDN | UNDELIVERABLE MAIL - NO ACTION TAKEN | — |
| Oct 28, 2017 | DENA | NOTIFICATION OF EFFECT OF CANCELLATION OF INTL REG MAILED | — |
| Oct 27, 2017 | DETH | DEATH OF INTERNATIONAL REGISTRATION | — |
| Oct 27, 2016 | NREP | NEW REPRESENTATIVE AT IB RECEIVED | — |
| Apr 17, 2014 | NREP | NEW REPRESENTATIVE AT IB RECEIVED | — |
| Feb 22, 2013 | NREP | NEW REPRESENTATIVE AT IB RECEIVED | — |
| Dec 28, 2012 | NREP | NEW REPRESENTATIVE AT IB RECEIVED | — |
| Mar 6, 2009 | FINT | FINAL DECISION TRANSACTION PROCESSED BY IB | — |
| Jan 26, 2009 | FICS | FINAL DISPOSITION NOTICE SENT TO IB | — |
| Jan 25, 2009 | FICR | FINAL DISPOSITION NOTICE CREATED, TO BE SENT TO IB | — |
| Apr 3, 2008 | CRCV | CORRECTION TRANSACTION RECEIVED FROM IB | — |
| Jan 25, 2008 | MAB2 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - FAILURE TO RESPOND | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Jan 25, 2008 | ABN2 | ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSE | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Jul 20, 2007 | RFNT | REFUSAL PROCESSED BY IB | — |
| Jun 29, 2007 | RFCS | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED - REFUSAL SENT TO IB | — |
| Jun 29, 2007 | RFRR | REFUSAL PROCESSED BY MPU | — |
| Jun 29, 2007 | RFCR | NON-FINAL ACTION (IB REFUSAL) PREPARED FOR REVIEW | — |
| Jun 28, 2007 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Jun 22, 2007 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Jun 22, 2007 | NWAP | NEW APPLICATION ENTERED | — |
| Jun 21, 2007 | REPR | SN ASSIGNED FOR SECT 66A APPL FROM IB | — |