USPTO serial 79038408
CARSPAZE
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
Status 402
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- ELLINGER FATHY, JESSICA M
- Law office
- TMO LAW OFFICE 110 - EXAMINING ATTORNEY ASSIGNED
What this means
This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.
Need help with CARSPAZE?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
BRIAN M DAVIS
BRIAN M DAVIS ALSTON & BIRD LLP101 S TRYON STSTE 400CHARLOTTE, NC 28280Goods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 035 | Advertising space and rental thereof, namely, the rental of advertising space at garages and carparks; business administration of parking garages; rental of publicity material | SECTION 70 - CANCELLED | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Oct 28, 2017 | DENA | NOTIFICATION OF EFFECT OF CANCELLATION OF INTL REG MAILED | — |
| Oct 27, 2017 | DETH | DEATH OF INTERNATIONAL REGISTRATION | — |
| May 19, 2017 | INNT | TOTAL INVALIDATION PROCESSED BY THE IB | — |
| Jul 21, 2014 | NREP | NEW REPRESENTATIVE AT IB RECEIVED | — |
| Dec 4, 2011 | FINT | FINAL DECISION TRANSACTION PROCESSED BY IB | — |
| Oct 25, 2011 | FICS | FINAL DISPOSITION NOTICE SENT TO IB | — |
| Oct 25, 2011 | FICR | FINAL DISPOSITION NOTICE CREATED, TO BE SENT TO IB | — |
| Oct 25, 2010 | MAB2 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - FAILURE TO RESPOND | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Oct 25, 2010 | ABN2 | ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSE | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Mar 29, 2010 | CNFR | FINAL REFUSAL MAILED | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| Mar 28, 2010 | CNFR | FINAL REFUSAL WRITTEN | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| Mar 1, 2010 | ACEC | AMENDMENT FROM APPLICANT ENTERED | — |
| Mar 1, 2010 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Feb 26, 2010 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Nov 6, 2009 | OPNX | NOTIFICATION OF POSSIBLE OPPOSITION - PROCESSED BY IB | — |
| Oct 22, 2009 | OPNS | NOTIFICATION OF POSSIBLE OPPOSITION SENT TO IB | — |
| Oct 22, 2009 | OPNR | NOTIFICATION OF POSSIBLE OPPOSITION CREATED, TO BE SENT TO IB | — |
| Aug 26, 2009 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Aug 25, 2009 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Aug 3, 2009 | ACEC | AMENDMENT FROM APPLICANT ENTERED | — |
| Aug 3, 2009 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Jul 30, 2009 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Nov 6, 2008 | CHLD | CHANGE OF OWNER RECEIVED FROM IB | — |
| Nov 3, 2008 | CORR | CORRECTION FROM IB ENTERED - NO REVIEW REQUIRED | — |
| Nov 3, 2008 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Oct 16, 2008 | DPCC | DIVISIONAL PROCESSING COMPLETE | — |
| Oct 6, 2008 | DRRR | DIVISIONAL REQUEST RECEIVED | — |
| Oct 6, 2008 | UNPR | UNRESPONSIVE/DUPLICATE PAPER RECEIVED | — |
| Oct 6, 2008 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Oct 6, 2008 | AITU | CASE ASSIGNED TO INTENT TO USE PARALEGAL | — |
| Oct 6, 2008 | AITU | CASE ASSIGNED TO INTENT TO USE PARALEGAL | — |
| Sep 29, 2008 | UNPR | UNRESPONSIVE/DUPLICATE PAPER RECEIVED | — |
| Sep 29, 2008 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| May 22, 2008 | RINX | USPTO CORRECTION PROCESSED BY IB | — |
| May 22, 2008 | CRCV | CORRECTION TRANSACTION RECEIVED FROM IB | — |
| Mar 31, 2008 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Mar 28, 2008 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Mar 6, 2008 | ACEC | AMENDMENT FROM APPLICANT ENTERED | — |
| Mar 6, 2008 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Mar 6, 2008 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| Feb 8, 2008 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Sep 1, 2007 | RFNT | REFUSAL PROCESSED BY IB | — |
| Aug 13, 2007 | RFCS | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED - REFUSAL SENT TO IB | — |
| Aug 13, 2007 | RFRR | REFUSAL PROCESSED BY MPU | — |
| Aug 11, 2007 | RFCR | NON-FINAL ACTION (IB REFUSAL) PREPARED FOR REVIEW | — |
| Aug 10, 2007 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Jul 18, 2007 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Jun 22, 2007 | NWAP | NEW APPLICATION ENTERED | — |
| Jun 21, 2007 | REPR | SN ASSIGNED FOR SECT 66A APPL FROM IB | — |