Drawing for ACTEGA

USPTO serial 79038420

ACTEGA

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Reg. 3602606Status 706Registered
Filing date
Status date
Registration date
Apr 7, 2009
Examiner
SAITO, KIM
Law office
GENERIC WEB UPDATE

What this means

This trademark is registered with the USPTO. Monitoring new filings can help you catch lookalike marks early.

Need help with ACTEGA?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Owner

Attorney of record

The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.

Mary Catherine Merz

Mary Catherine Merz Merz & Associates, P.C.408 MADISON STREET, SUITE AOak Park, IL 60302UNITED STATES

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
001Chemical products for commercial and scientific purposes, namely, adhesives for industrial and scientific purposes; polymers based on polyimide, polyamideimide, polyester, polyester-imide, polyurethane, phenoxy and polyamide for copper and aluminum conductors; polymers for the coatings of electric and electronic devices; chemical additives for oils, paints, varnishes, lacquers; wetting agents for use in the manufacture of paints, varnishes, lacquers; polymers for electronic materials, chemical products for the preparation of enamels, industrial adhesives for use in coating and sealing, and unprocessed synthetic resins for the manufacture of impregnations, encapsulating and potting compounds; polymers, namely, compositions used in the manufacture of commercial and industrial goods for applications in the electrical and electronic industries; unprocessed plastics for industrial use; adhesives for general industrial use; emulsion agents, dispersing agents, chemical agents for increasing or reducing the surface tension of paints and lacquers; silicone resinsACTIVE—
002Paints, varnishes, lacquers; pigments, namely, iron pigments, pearl gloss pigments, metal effect pigments, interference pigments; powder coatings for protecting and sealing metal, plastic and synthetic surfaces; anti-corrosive coatings, anti-rust oils and coatings, synthetic and natural dyes for general industrial use, unprocessed natural resins for use in the manufacture of impregnations, encapsulating and potting compounds, motors coils; protective, sealer, ultraviolet rays-resistant, heat-resistant, high-voltage resistant and dielectric coatings for metals; lacquers for use in the electric and electronic industryACTIVE—
040[ Treatment of material, namely, treatment of metals, coat steel, aluminum, plastic, paper, plaster and wood boards, paints and lacquers, metal and plastic laminating and plating, tin plating; application of protective coatings, paint and lacquer additives; galvanization; magnetization; vulcanization; processing of pigments into raw lacquers, namely, bonding of powder lacquers ]SECTION 71 - CANCELLED—

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

DateCodeEventWhat it means
Apr 24, 2019TCCATEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED—
Jan 12, 2019INNAINVALIDATION REVIEWED - NO ACTION REQUIRED BY OFFICE—
Dec 30, 2018INPRPARTIAL INVALIDATION OF REG EXT PROTECTION CREATED—
Apr 30, 2018NA71NOTICE OF ACCEPTANCE OF SEC. 71 - E-MAILED—
Apr 30, 201871AGREGISTERED-SEC.71 ACCEPTED—
Apr 24, 2018ES71TEAS SECTION 71 RECEIVED—
Apr 7, 2018REM4COURTESY REMINDER - SEC. 71 (10-YR) E-MAILED—
Jan 26, 2017RNWLINTERNATIONAL REGISTRATION RENEWED—
Jul 24, 2015INNPPARTIAL INVALIDATION PROCESSED BY THE IB—
Jul 2, 2015INPSPARTIAL INVALIDATION OF REG EXT PROTECTION SENT TO IB—
Jul 2, 2015INPCINVALIDATION PROCESSED—
Apr 28, 2015INPRPARTIAL INVALIDATION OF REG EXT PROTECTION CREATED—
Aug 28, 2014NA75NOTICE OF ACCEPTANCE OF SEC. 71 & 15 - E-MAILED—
Aug 28, 2014C75PREGISTERED - PARTIAL SEC. 71 ACCEPTED & SEC. 15 ACK.—
Aug 28, 2014APRECASE ASSIGNED TO POST REGISTRATION PARALEGAL—
Aug 19, 2014ES75TEAS SECTION 71 & 15 RECEIVED—
Mar 6, 2014NREPNEW REPRESENTATIVE AT IB RECEIVED—
Jan 11, 2013FINOFINAL DECISION TRANSACTION PROCESSED BY IB—
Jul 22, 2009FICSFINAL DISPOSITION NOTICE SENT TO IB—
Jul 22, 2009FIMPFINAL DISPOSITION PROCESSED—
Jul 7, 2009FICRFINAL DISPOSITION NOTICE CREATED, TO BE SENT TO IB—
Apr 7, 2009R.PRREGISTERED-PRINCIPAL REGISTERYour trademark is registered on the Principal Register — the strongest form of federal trademark protection. You may use the ® symbol for the covered goods and services. Maintenance filings (Section 8 and renewals) are required to keep the registration alive.
Jan 29, 2009OPNXNOTIFICATION OF POSSIBLE OPPOSITION - PROCESSED BY IB—
Jan 20, 2009PUBOPUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITIONYour mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance.
Jan 15, 2009OPNSNOTIFICATION OF POSSIBLE OPPOSITION SENT TO IB—
Jan 15, 2009OPNRNOTIFICATION OF POSSIBLE OPPOSITION CREATED, TO BE SENT TO IB—
Dec 31, 2008NPUBNOTICE OF PUBLICATION—
Dec 12, 2008PREVLAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED—
Dec 11, 2008CNSAAPPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER—
Dec 11, 2008TEMETEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED—
Dec 10, 2008CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Dec 10, 2008TROATEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVEDThis event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action.
Nov 13, 2008CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Nov 12, 2008CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION WRITTENA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Oct 9, 2008DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
Oct 8, 2008ACECAMENDMENT FROM APPLICANT ENTERED—
Oct 8, 2008CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Oct 3, 2008ALIEASSIGNED TO LIE—
Sep 22, 2008CHANAPPLICANT/CORRESPONDENCE CHANGES (NON-RESPONSIVE) ENTERED—
Jun 5, 2008CHLDCHANGE OF OWNER RECEIVED FROM IB—
May 21, 2008DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
May 15, 2008TEMETEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED—
May 14, 2008CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
May 14, 2008ERFRTEAS REQUEST FOR RECONSIDERATION RECEIVED—
Nov 15, 2007GNFNNOTIFICATION OF FINAL REFUSAL EMAILED—
Nov 15, 2007GNFRFINAL REFUSAL E-MAILEDA final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon.
Nov 15, 2007CNFRFINAL REFUSAL WRITTENA final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon.
Oct 1, 2007TCCATEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED—
Oct 1, 2007TEMETEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED—
Oct 1, 2007CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Oct 1, 2007TROATEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVEDThis event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action.
Aug 29, 2007CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Aug 28, 2007CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION WRITTENA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Aug 21, 2007CREVCORRECTION FROM IB ENTERED - ATTORNEY REVIEW REQUIRED—
Aug 9, 2007CRCVCORRECTION TRANSACTION RECEIVED FROM IB—
Jul 26, 2007RFNTREFUSAL PROCESSED BY IB—
Jul 2, 2007RFCSNON-FINAL ACTION MAILED - REFUSAL SENT TO IB—
Jul 2, 2007RFRRREFUSAL PROCESSED BY MPU—
Jul 1, 2007RFCRNON-FINAL ACTION (IB REFUSAL) PREPARED FOR REVIEW—
Jun 30, 2007CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION WRITTENA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Jun 22, 2007DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
Jun 22, 2007NWAPNEW APPLICATION ENTERED—
Jun 21, 2007REPRSN ASSIGNED FOR SECT 66A APPL FROM IB—

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance