Drawing for HOMEPUTER

USPTO serial 79038424

HOMEPUTER

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Status 402
Filing date
Status date
Registration date
—
Examiner
MICHOS, JOHN E
Law office
TMEG LAW OFFICE 105 - EXAMINING ATTORNEY ASSIGNED

What this means

This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.

Need help with HOMEPUTER?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Owner

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
009Scientific, nautical, surveying, photographic, cinematographic, optical, weighing, measuring, signalling, checking (supervision), life-saving and teaching apparatus and instruments; electronic apparatus and instruments (as far as included in this class); apparatus for recording, transmission or reproduction of sound or images; magnetic data carriers, recording discs; automatic vending machines and mechanisms for coin operated apparatus; cash registers, calculating machines, data processing equipment and computersSECTION 70 - CANCELLED—

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

DateCodeEventWhat it means
Oct 7, 2017DENANOTIFICATION OF EFFECT OF CANCELLATION OF INTL REG MAILED—
Oct 6, 2017DETHDEATH OF INTERNATIONAL REGISTRATION—
Mar 14, 2009FINTFINAL DECISION TRANSACTION PROCESSED BY IB—
Feb 2, 2009FICSFINAL DISPOSITION NOTICE SENT TO IB—
Jan 31, 2009FICRFINAL DISPOSITION NOTICE CREATED, TO BE SENT TO IB—
Dec 13, 2008OPNXNOTIFICATION OF POSSIBLE OPPOSITION - PROCESSED BY IB—
Nov 27, 2008OPNSNOTIFICATION OF POSSIBLE OPPOSITION SENT TO IB—
Nov 27, 2008OPNRNOTIFICATION OF POSSIBLE OPPOSITION CREATED, TO BE SENT TO IB—
Feb 1, 2008MAB2ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - FAILURE TO RESPONDThe trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time.
Jan 31, 2008ABN2ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSEThe trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time.
Nov 30, 2007NREPNEW REPRESENTATIVE AT IB RECEIVED—
Jul 13, 2007RFNTREFUSAL PROCESSED BY IB—
Jun 27, 2007RFCSNON-FINAL ACTION MAILED - REFUSAL SENT TO IB—
Jun 27, 2007RFRRREFUSAL PROCESSED BY MPU—
Jun 27, 2007RFCRNON-FINAL ACTION (IB REFUSAL) PREPARED FOR REVIEW—
Jun 26, 2007CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION WRITTENA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Jun 25, 2007DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
Jun 22, 2007NWAPNEW APPLICATION ENTERED—
Jun 21, 2007LIMSLIMITATION OF GOODS/SERVICES FROM IB ENTERED—
Jun 21, 2007REPRSN ASSIGNED FOR SECT 66A APPL FROM IB—

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance