USPTO serial 79038480
JÜPO
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
Reg. 3705389Status 404
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- Nov 3, 2009
- Examiner
- LEE, DEBRA ANN
- Law office
- PUBLICATION AND ISSUE SECTION
What this means
This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.
Need help with JÜPO?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Ursula B. Day
Ursula B. Day LAw Firm of Ursula B. Day708 Third AvenueSuite 1501New York, NY 10017Goods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 006 | CONTAINERS MADE OF METAL FOR TRANSPORT, GENERAL PURPOSE STORAGE AND INDUSTRIAL PACKAGING CONTAINERS OF METAL, NAMELY, CASES FOR UNITS AT SINGLE PRODUCTION OR UNITS OF MASS PRODUCTION, FOR PRODUCTS FOR THE AUTOMOBILE INDUSTRY AND SUPPLIERS THEREOF, FOR TOOLS, FOR BOLTS, FOR UNITS FOR THE PRODUCTION OF AUTOMOBILES, BOXES, CONTAINERS FOR UNITS OF SINGLE PRODUCTION OR UNITS OF MASS PRODUCTION, FOR PRODUCTS FOR THE AUTOMOBILE INDUSTRY AND SUPPLIERS THEREOF, FOR TOOLS, FOR BOLTS, FOR UNITS FOR THE PRODUCTION OF AUTOMOBILES; PALLETS AND STORAGE RACKS MADE OF METAL FOR UNITS OF SINGLE PRODUCTION OR UNITS OF MASS PRODUCTION, FOR PRODUCTS FOR THE AUTOMOBILE INDUSTRY AND SUPPLIERS THEREOF, FOR TOOLS, FOR BOLTS, FOR UNITS FOR THE PRODUCTION OF AUTOMOBILES | SECTION 71 - CANCELLED | — |
| 020 | STORAGE RACKS; CONTAINERS MADE OF SYNTHETIC MATERIAL FOR COMMERCIAL TRANSPORT, STORAGE AND PACKAGING | SECTION 71 - CANCELLED | — |
| 042 | COMPUTER SOFTWARE PROGRAMMING; SERVICES OF AN ENGINEER, NAMELY, TECHNICAL CONSULTANCY IN THE FIELD OF CONSTRUCTION AND DEVELOPMENT OF CAD MODELS FOR NON STANDARD LOADING EQUIPMENT, IN THE FIELD OF DEVELOPMENT AND PRODUCTION OF TRANSPORT AND LOGISTIC SYSTEMS AND IN THE FIELD OF RADIO FREQUENCY IDENTIFICATION (RFID) SYSTEMS; SERVICES OF A SOFTWARE ENGINEER; CONSULTANCY IN THE FIELD OF DATA PROCESSING, NAMELY, IMPLEMENTATION OF COMPUTER SOFTWARE FEATURING INTEGRATED CONCEPTS FOR LOGISTICS, OPTIMIZATION OF LOGISTIC SOFTWARE SOLUTIONS, AND COMPUTER SOFTWARE CONCEPT DEVELOPMENT AND DEVELOPMENT OF LOGISTIC SOFTWARE SOLUTIONS; CONSULTANCY IN THE FIELD OF TELECOMMUNICATION TECHNOLOGIES, NAMELY, IMPLEMENTATION OF COMPUTER SOFTWARE FEATURING INTEGRATED CONCEPTS FOR LOGISTICS, OPTIMIZATION OF LOGISTIC SOFTWARE SOLUTIONS, AND COMPUTER SOFTWARE CONCEPT DEVELOPMENT AND DEVELOPMENT OF LOGISTIC SOFTWARE SOLUTIONS; SERVICES IN THE FIELD OF DATA PROCESSING, NAMELY, ADAPTING, UPDATING, IMPLEMENTING AND MAINTAINING OF SOFTWARE | SECTION 71 - CANCELLED | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
- Other trademarks owned by JÜPO GmbH
- Other trademarks owned by JÜPO GmbH
- Other trademarks owned by JÜPO GmbH
- Other trademarks owned by Jürgens & Pontzen GmbH & Co. KG
- Other trademarks in Class 006
- Other trademarks in Class 020
- Other trademarks in Class 042
- Similar marks named JÜPO
- Recently changed USPTO trademarks
- Recently filed trademarks
- Browse all trademark records
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Jun 23, 2017 | DENC | NOTIFICATION OF EFFECT OF CANCELLATION OF INTL REG MAILED | — |
| Jun 23, 2017 | DETH | DEATH OF INTERNATIONAL REGISTRATION | — |
| May 12, 2017 | INNT | TOTAL INVALIDATION PROCESSED BY THE IB | — |
| Mar 28, 2017 | INTS | TOTAL INVALIDATION OF REG EXT PROTECTION SENT TO IB | — |
| Mar 27, 2017 | INPC | INVALIDATION PROCESSED | — |
| Feb 10, 2017 | INTR | TOTAL INVALIDATION OF REG EXT PROTECTION CREATED | — |
| Jun 10, 2016 | C71T | CANCELLED SECTION 71 | — |
| Jan 27, 2013 | FINO | FINAL DECISION TRANSACTION PROCESSED BY IB | — |
| Mar 1, 2010 | FICS | FINAL DISPOSITION NOTICE SENT TO IB | — |
| Mar 1, 2010 | FIMP | FINAL DISPOSITION PROCESSED | — |
| Feb 3, 2010 | FICR | FINAL DISPOSITION NOTICE CREATED, TO BE SENT TO IB | — |
| Nov 3, 2009 | R.PR | REGISTERED-PRINCIPAL REGISTER | Your trademark is registered on the Principal Register — the strongest form of federal trademark protection. You may use the ® symbol for the covered goods and services. Maintenance filings (Section 8 and renewals) are required to keep the registration alive. |
| Aug 18, 2009 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| Jul 29, 2009 | NPUB | NOTICE OF PUBLICATION | — |
| Jul 13, 2009 | PREV | LAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED | — |
| Jul 9, 2009 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Jun 12, 2009 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Jun 12, 2009 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Jun 12, 2009 | TROA | TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Dec 15, 2008 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Dec 13, 2008 | OPNX | NOTIFICATION OF POSSIBLE OPPOSITION - PROCESSED BY IB | — |
| Dec 13, 2008 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Nov 27, 2008 | OPNS | NOTIFICATION OF POSSIBLE OPPOSITION SENT TO IB | — |
| Nov 27, 2008 | OPNR | NOTIFICATION OF POSSIBLE OPPOSITION CREATED, TO BE SENT TO IB | — |
| Nov 21, 2008 | MREI | NOTICE OF REINSTATEMENT MAILED | — |
| Nov 20, 2008 | ARAA | ATTORNEY/DOM.REP.REVOKED AND/OR APPOINTED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Nov 20, 2008 | REAP | TEAS REVOKE/APP/CHANGE ADDR OF ATTY/DOM REP RECEIVED | — |
| Oct 1, 2008 | RGIA | REINSTATEMENT GRANTED - INADVERTENTLY ABANDONED | — |
| Oct 1, 2008 | MAB2 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - FAILURE TO RESPOND | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Oct 1, 2008 | ABN2 | ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSE | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Apr 17, 2008 | UNDN | UNDELIVERABLE MAIL - NO ACTION TAKEN | — |
| Apr 3, 2008 | CHLD | CHANGE OF OWNER RECEIVED FROM IB | — |
| Feb 22, 2008 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Feb 21, 2008 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Jan 25, 2008 | ACEC | AMENDMENT FROM APPLICANT ENTERED | — |
| Jan 25, 2008 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Jan 23, 2008 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| Dec 10, 2007 | FAXX | FAX RECEIVED | — |
| Jul 20, 2007 | RFNT | REFUSAL PROCESSED BY IB | — |
| Jun 28, 2007 | RFCS | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED - REFUSAL SENT TO IB | — |
| Jun 28, 2007 | RFRR | REFUSAL PROCESSED BY MPU | — |
| Jun 28, 2007 | RFCR | NON-FINAL ACTION (IB REFUSAL) PREPARED FOR REVIEW | — |
| Jun 27, 2007 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Jun 22, 2007 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Jun 22, 2007 | NWAP | NEW APPLICATION ENTERED | — |
| Jun 21, 2007 | REPR | SN ASSIGNED FOR SECT 66A APPL FROM IB | — |