USPTO serial 79038566
RADARLUX
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
Reg. 3567830Status 404
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- Jan 27, 2009
- Examiner
- CHOSID, ROBIN S
- Law office
- PUBLICATION AND ISSUE SECTION
What this means
This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.
Need help with RADARLUX?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
Goods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 009 | Measuring. control, regulating and display devices, namely, radars used as proximity switches for the detection of persons, vehicles and objects, radars used for the determination of speed and number of vehicles, radars and cameras for the determination of the average speed of vehicles over certain defined distances, radars for the automatic recognition of license plates, radars, lasers and cameras for the mobile measurement of speed, radars with LED displays to display speed radar and laser guns, radars for the determination of the average speed of vehicles over certain defined distances, radars for the detection of speed and for the speed dependent switching of traffic and security devices, radars for the measurement of speed and the determination of distance between vehicles, radar and laser measurement devices with digital image documentation; electronic proximity switches for controlling gate systems, doors, barrier systems, traffic light systems, warning systems, security switches; electronic proximity switches for distinguishing between people and vehicles; laser and other apparatus for speed measurement and/or for displaying speed, optionally including devices for data recording and documentation; electronic apparatus for recording traffic data and/or for carrying out data analysis, statistical evaluation, traffic planning, control of displays and/or control of evaluation devices; electronic apparatus for measuring speed, classifying vehicles and saving traffic data; electronic apparatus for traffic control, namely, red light monitoring systems, speed monitoring systems, devices for recording vehicle license numbers; electronic handhelds for acquiring and monitoring traffic offenders and/or for transferring data, processing data, analyzing data and printing traffic tickets; systems comprised of radars, lasers and/or cameras for acquiring, pursuing and managing traffic offenders; electronic control and registration devices for verifying the payment of road tolls; sensors for the above mentioned devices, namely, radar sensors, laser sensors, piezo sensors, inductive loops, video cameras; electronic control units for the above mentioned devices | SECTION 71 - CANCELLED | — |
| 011 | Lighting apparatus, namely, interior and exterior lights for use with the aforementioned measuring, control, regulating and display devices | SECTION 71 - CANCELLED | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
- Other trademarks owned by Radarlux Radar Systems GmbH
- Other trademarks owned by Radarlux Radar Systems GmbH
- Other trademarks owned by Radarlux Radar Systems GmbH
- Other trademarks in Class 009
- Other trademarks in Class 011
- Similar marks named RADARLUX
- Recently changed USPTO trademarks
- Recently filed trademarks
- Browse all trademark records
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Apr 8, 2016 | UNDN | UNDELIVERABLE MAIL - NO ACTION TAKEN | — |
| Jan 31, 2016 | DENC | NOTIFICATION OF EFFECT OF CANCELLATION OF INTL REG MAILED | — |
| Jan 31, 2016 | DETH | DEATH OF INTERNATIONAL REGISTRATION | — |
| Aug 28, 2015 | C71T | CANCELLED SECTION 71 | — |
| Jan 5, 2013 | FINO | FINAL DECISION TRANSACTION PROCESSED BY IB | — |
| May 8, 2009 | FICS | FINAL DISPOSITION NOTICE SENT TO IB | — |
| May 8, 2009 | FIMP | FINAL DISPOSITION PROCESSED | — |
| Apr 27, 2009 | FICR | FINAL DISPOSITION NOTICE CREATED, TO BE SENT TO IB | — |
| Jan 27, 2009 | R.PR | REGISTERED-PRINCIPAL REGISTER | Your trademark is registered on the Principal Register — the strongest form of federal trademark protection. You may use the ® symbol for the covered goods and services. Maintenance filings (Section 8 and renewals) are required to keep the registration alive. |
| Jan 22, 2009 | OPNX | NOTIFICATION OF POSSIBLE OPPOSITION - PROCESSED BY IB | — |
| Jan 1, 2009 | OPNS | NOTIFICATION OF POSSIBLE OPPOSITION SENT TO IB | — |
| Jan 1, 2009 | OPNR | NOTIFICATION OF POSSIBLE OPPOSITION CREATED, TO BE SENT TO IB | — |
| Nov 11, 2008 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| Oct 22, 2008 | NPUB | NOTICE OF PUBLICATION | — |
| Oct 9, 2008 | ADCH | CHANGE OF NAME/ADDRESS REC'D FROM IB | — |
| Oct 7, 2008 | PREV | LAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED | — |
| Oct 7, 2008 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Oct 6, 2008 | ACEC | AMENDMENT FROM APPLICANT ENTERED | — |
| Oct 6, 2008 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Oct 1, 2008 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| Oct 1, 2008 | FAXX | FAX RECEIVED | — |
| Apr 17, 2008 | CNFR | FINAL REFUSAL MAILED | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| Apr 16, 2008 | CNFR | FINAL REFUSAL WRITTEN | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| Mar 24, 2008 | DMCC | DATA MODIFICATION COMPLETED | — |
| Mar 24, 2008 | LIEC | LEGAL INSTRUMENT EXAMINER (LIE) - CORRECTION | — |
| Mar 6, 2008 | ACEC | AMENDMENT FROM APPLICANT ENTERED | — |
| Mar 6, 2008 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Mar 6, 2008 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| Feb 6, 2008 | FAXX | FAX RECEIVED | — |
| Aug 23, 2007 | RFNT | REFUSAL PROCESSED BY IB | — |
| Aug 6, 2007 | RFCS | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED - REFUSAL SENT TO IB | — |
| Aug 6, 2007 | RFRR | REFUSAL PROCESSED BY MPU | — |
| Aug 4, 2007 | RFCR | NON-FINAL ACTION (IB REFUSAL) PREPARED FOR REVIEW | — |
| Aug 3, 2007 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Aug 2, 2007 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Jul 26, 2007 | CRCV | CORRECTION TRANSACTION RECEIVED FROM IB | — |
| Jun 22, 2007 | NWAP | NEW APPLICATION ENTERED | — |
| Jun 21, 2007 | SDRC | SN ASSIGNED FOR SECT 66A SUBSEQ DESIG FROM IB | — |