Drawing for TALISMAN COLOR DREAMS

USPTO serial 79038629

TALISMAN COLOR DREAMS

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Status 402
Filing date
Status date
Registration date
—
Examiner
VOHRA, SANJEEV KUMAR
Law office
TMO LAW OFFICE 110 - EXAMINING ATTORNEY ASSIGNED

What this means

This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.

Need help with TALISMAN COLOR DREAMS?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Owner

Attorney of record

The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.

Robert M. Wasnofski, Jr.

Robert M. Wasnofski, Jr. Dorsey & Whitney LLP51 West 52nd StreetNew York, NY 10019-6119UNITED STATES

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
014Precious metals and their alloys sold in bulk; jewellery; precious stones; timepieces and chronometric instruments, namely watches, wrist-watches, chronometers, clocks, table clocksSECTION 70 - CANCELLED—

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

DateCodeEventWhat it means
Sep 22, 2017DENANOTIFICATION OF EFFECT OF CANCELLATION OF INTL REG E-MAILED—
Sep 21, 2017DETHDEATH OF INTERNATIONAL REGISTRATION—
Apr 6, 2017ARAAATTORNEY/DOM.REP.REVOKED AND/OR APPOINTEDThis event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action.
Apr 6, 2017REAPTEAS REVOKE/APP/CHANGE ADDR OF ATTY/DOM REP RECEIVED—
Jun 22, 2012NREPNEW REPRESENTATIVE AT IB RECEIVED—
Feb 23, 2011CORNCORRECTION FROM THE IB EXAMINED, NO ACTION IS NEEDED—
Feb 18, 2011CRCVCORRECTION TRANSACTION RECEIVED FROM IB—
Apr 22, 2010ADCHCHANGE OF NAME/ADDRESS REC'D FROM IB—
May 14, 2009CHLDCHANGE OF OWNER RECEIVED FROM IB—
Mar 6, 2009FINTFINAL DECISION TRANSACTION PROCESSED BY IB—
Feb 12, 2009FICSFINAL DISPOSITION NOTICE SENT TO IB—
Feb 12, 2009FICRFINAL DISPOSITION NOTICE CREATED, TO BE SENT TO IB—
Dec 19, 2008OPNXNOTIFICATION OF POSSIBLE OPPOSITION - PROCESSED BY IB—
Dec 4, 2008OPNSNOTIFICATION OF POSSIBLE OPPOSITION SENT TO IB—
Dec 4, 2008OPNRNOTIFICATION OF POSSIBLE OPPOSITION CREATED, TO BE SENT TO IB—
Feb 12, 2008MAB2ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - FAILURE TO RESPONDThe trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time.
Feb 12, 2008ABN2ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSEThe trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time.
Aug 2, 2007RFNTREFUSAL PROCESSED BY IB—
Jul 17, 2007RFCSNON-FINAL ACTION MAILED - REFUSAL SENT TO IB—
Jul 17, 2007RFRRREFUSAL PROCESSED BY MPU—
Jul 17, 2007RFCRNON-FINAL ACTION (IB REFUSAL) PREPARED FOR REVIEW—
Jul 16, 2007CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION WRITTENA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Jun 29, 2007DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
Jun 29, 2007NWAPNEW APPLICATION ENTERED—
Jun 28, 2007LIMSLIMITATION OF GOODS/SERVICES FROM IB ENTERED—
Jun 28, 2007REPRSN ASSIGNED FOR SECT 66A APPL FROM IB—

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance