CopyMark Law Group
4.9/5
Drawing for AWANI

USPTO serial 79038634

AWANI

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Reg. 3537205Status 709
Filing date
Status date
Registration date
Nov 25, 2008
Examiner
PRICE, WANDA
Law office
GENERIC WEB UPDATE

What this means

This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.

Need help with AWANI?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Trademark Monitoring
(312) 319-4460
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Start a new application
(312) 319-4460

Owner

Attorney of record

The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.

Corey K. Cho

Corey K. Cho Saliwanchik, Lloyd & Eisenschenk, P.A.3107 SW Williston RdGainesville, FL 32608UNITED STATES

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
029Canned fruits; fruit chips; cooked fruits; crystallized fruits; dried fruit; frosted fruits; frozen fruits; fruit compote; fruit concentrates used as ingredients of foods and drink; fruit conserves; fruit preserved in syrup; fruit-flavored yogurt; fruit-based filling for cakes and pies; fruit jellies; fruit preserves; fruits preserved in alcohol; fruit pastes; fruit peels; fruit puree used as ingredients of foods and drinks; fruit salads; fruit-based spreads; processed fruits; jams; fruit jams; marmalade; fruit marmalade; mashed fruits used as ingredients of foods and drinks; pickled fruits; prepared fruits; stewed fruits; tinned fruitsSECTION 71 - CANCELLED—

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

DateCodeEventWhat it means
Aug 27, 2026ADCHCHANGE OF NAME/ADDRESS REC'D FROM IB—
Jun 19, 2020INNTTOTAL INVALIDATION PROCESSED BY THE IB—
May 19, 2020INTSTOTAL INVALIDATION OF REG EXT PROTECTION SENT TO IB—
May 19, 2020INPCINVALIDATION PROCESSED—
Feb 28, 2020INTRTOTAL INVALIDATION OF REG EXT PROTECTION CREATED—
Jun 28, 2019C71TCANCELLED SECTION 71—
Nov 25, 2017REM4COURTESY REMINDER - SEC. 71 (10-YR) E-MAILED—
Aug 17, 2017RNWLINTERNATIONAL REGISTRATION RENEWED—
May 4, 2015NA71NOTICE OF ACCEPTANCE OF SEC. 71 - E-MAILED—
May 4, 201571AGREGISTERED-SEC.71 ACCEPTED—
May 4, 2015APRECASE ASSIGNED TO POST REGISTRATION PARALEGAL—
Apr 20, 2015ES71TEAS SECTION 71 RECEIVED—
Jan 6, 2013FINOFINAL DECISION TRANSACTION PROCESSED BY IB—
Mar 16, 2009FICSFINAL DISPOSITION NOTICE SENT TO IB—
Mar 16, 2009FIMPFINAL DISPOSITION PROCESSED—
Feb 25, 2009FICRFINAL DISPOSITION NOTICE CREATED, TO BE SENT TO IB—
Nov 25, 2008R.PRREGISTERED-PRINCIPAL REGISTERYour trademark is registered on the Principal Register — the strongest form of federal trademark protection. You may use the ® symbol for the covered goods and services. Maintenance filings (Section 8 and renewals) are required to keep the registration alive.
Sep 9, 2008PUBOPUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITIONYour mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance.
Aug 20, 2008NPUBNOTICE OF PUBLICATION—
Aug 1, 2008PREVLAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED—
Jul 31, 2008CNSAAPPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER—
Jul 31, 2008XAECEXAMINER'S AMENDMENT ENTERED—
Jul 31, 2008GNENNOTIFICATION OF EXAMINERS AMENDMENT E-MAILED—
Jul 31, 2008GNEAEXAMINERS AMENDMENT E-MAILED—
Jul 31, 2008CNEAEXAMINERS AMENDMENT -WRITTEN—
Jul 30, 2008TEMETEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED—
Jul 30, 2008CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Jul 30, 2008TROATEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVEDThis event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action.
May 20, 2008GNRNNOTIFICATION OF NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
May 20, 2008GNRTNON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
May 20, 2008CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION WRITTENA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Apr 3, 2008TEMETEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED—
Apr 3, 2008CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Apr 3, 2008ALIEASSIGNED TO LIE—
Apr 1, 2008TROATEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVEDThis event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action.
Mar 21, 2008ARAAATTORNEY/DOM.REP.REVOKED AND/OR APPOINTEDThis event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action.
Mar 21, 2008REAPTEAS REVOKE/APP/CHANGE ADDR OF ATTY/DOM REP RECEIVED—
Mar 21, 2008PETGPETITION TO REVIVE-GRANTED—
Mar 21, 2008PROATEAS PETITION TO REVIVE RECEIVED—
Feb 4, 2008MAB2ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - FAILURE TO RESPONDThe trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time.
Feb 4, 2008ABN2ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSEThe trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time.
Jul 26, 2007RFNTREFUSAL PROCESSED BY IB—
Jul 6, 2007RFCSNON-FINAL ACTION MAILED - REFUSAL SENT TO IB—
Jul 6, 2007RFRRREFUSAL PROCESSED BY MPU—
Jul 6, 2007RFCRNON-FINAL ACTION (IB REFUSAL) PREPARED FOR REVIEW—
Jul 5, 2007CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION WRITTENA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Jun 29, 2007DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
Jun 29, 2007NWAPNEW APPLICATION ENTERED—
Jun 28, 2007REPRSN ASSIGNED FOR SECT 66A APPL FROM IB—

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance