Drawing for TRACK

USPTO serial 79038660

TRACK

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Status 402
Filing date
Status date
Registration date
—
Examiner
MORRIS, KRISTINA KLOIBER
Law office
TMO LAW OFFICE 116 - EXAMINING ATTORNEY ASSIGNED

What this means

This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.

Need help with TRACK?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Owner

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
006Parts of installations for shops, separations for shelves, separation partitions for shop installation elements, fastening elements for shop furniture, shelf supports, all the said goods of metal and not included in other classesSECTION 70 - CANCELLED—
020Furniture; shop furniture, namely shelf units for shops, tables with levels for shelf units, shelvesSECTION 70 - CANCELLED—

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

DateCodeEventWhat it means
Oct 7, 2017DENANOTIFICATION OF EFFECT OF CANCELLATION OF INTL REG MAILED—
Oct 6, 2017DETHDEATH OF INTERNATIONAL REGISTRATION—
May 4, 2012NREPNEW REPRESENTATIVE AT IB RECEIVED—
Dec 10, 2010NREPNEW REPRESENTATIVE AT IB RECEIVED—
Mar 6, 2009FINTFINAL DECISION TRANSACTION PROCESSED BY IB—
Feb 4, 2009FICSFINAL DISPOSITION NOTICE SENT TO IB—
Feb 4, 2009FICRFINAL DISPOSITION NOTICE CREATED, TO BE SENT TO IB—
Dec 19, 2008OPNXNOTIFICATION OF POSSIBLE OPPOSITION - PROCESSED BY IB—
Dec 4, 2008OPNSNOTIFICATION OF POSSIBLE OPPOSITION SENT TO IB—
Dec 4, 2008OPNRNOTIFICATION OF POSSIBLE OPPOSITION CREATED, TO BE SENT TO IB—
Feb 4, 2008MAB2ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - FAILURE TO RESPONDThe trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time.
Feb 4, 2008ABN2ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSEThe trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time.
Aug 2, 2007RFNTREFUSAL PROCESSED BY IB—
Jul 6, 2007RFCSNON-FINAL ACTION MAILED - REFUSAL SENT TO IB—
Jul 6, 2007RFRRREFUSAL PROCESSED BY MPU—
Jul 6, 2007RFCRNON-FINAL ACTION (IB REFUSAL) PREPARED FOR REVIEW—
Jul 5, 2007CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION WRITTENA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Jun 30, 2007DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
Jun 29, 2007NWAPNEW APPLICATION ENTERED—
Jun 28, 2007REPRSN ASSIGNED FOR SECT 66A APPL FROM IB—

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance