USPTO serial 79038702
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
This trademark is registered with the USPTO. Monitoring new filings can help you catch lookalike marks early.
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
83395 Freilassing, DE
83395 Freilassing, DE
Freilassing, DE
Hawle Deutschland Armaturen GmbH
DE
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
John W. McGlynn
John W. McGlynn RatnerPrestia2200 Renaissance Blvd, Suite 350King of Prussia, PA 19406UNITED STATES| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 006 | Gas and liquid piping and pipeline components made predominantly of metal, namely, [ sleeves, shutters, sleeve shutters, straps, shackles, caps, flanges, pipes, pipe fittings, pipe clips, pipe collars, pipe connectors, pipe couplings and joints, junctions for pipes, pipe muffs, manually operated valves, sealing rings, gasket rings, ball lock pins, caps for pipes and pipe ends, closures for pipes and pipe ends, lids, plugs, seals, ] manhole covers, [ pipe safety fittings that minimize traction, dirt, and rotation, ] hand wheels, [ non-electric position indicators being parts of pipe valves, ] dummy covers, insertion pipes, nipples, gasket rings; [ metal shaft covers, ] metal height-adjustable and metal levellable shaft covers and their metal base components and frames [, metal brackets, and metal saddles for use in the construction, assembly and installation of piping ] | ACTIVE | — |
| 008 | Hand-operated tools for assembling and disassembling, maintaining and repairing pipes and pipe brackets, namely, hand held cutting tools, pinchers, wrenches, pliers, pipe beveling devices in the nature of pipe cutters, taps, hex key wrenches, extensions for hand tools | ACTIVE | — |
| 011 | [ Hydrants, plumbing fittings, namely, ventilating and evacuating valves and control valves ] | SECTION 7(e) - CANCELLED | — |
| 017 | [ Parts, predominantly made of metal, for gas and liquid braces, namely, gaskets ] | SECTION 71 - CANCELLED | — |
| 037 | [ Assembling and disassembling plumbing fittings and metal pipe fittings for gas and water piping and pipelines, and gas and liquid conduction systems ] | SECTION 71 - CANCELLED | — |
| 042 | [ Technical planning of gas and liquid piping and pipelines; technical planning services in the nature of industrial design of plumbing fittings and metal pipe fittings; technical planning of gas and liquid conduction systems ] | SECTION 71 - CANCELLED | — |
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Jan 22, 2026 | ADCH | CHANGE OF NAME/ADDRESS REC'D FROM IB | — |
| Mar 23, 2023 | PC.D | PETITION TO DIRECTOR DISMISSED | — |
| Feb 24, 2023 | TRPP | REQUEST FOR TRANSFORMATION PROCESSED - PARTIAL | — |
| Apr 9, 2021 | INNA | INVALIDATION REVIEWED - NO ACTION REQUIRED BY OFFICE | — |
| Apr 3, 2021 | INPR | PARTIAL INVALIDATION OF REG EXT PROTECTION CREATED | — |
| Mar 3, 2021 | APET | ASSIGNED TO PETITION STAFF | — |
| Oct 1, 2020 | TPDR | TEAS PETITION TO DIRECTOR RECEIVED | — |
| Sep 30, 2020 | TRDE | REQUEST FOR TRANSFORMATION DENIED | — |
| Sep 24, 2020 | ERFT | TEAS REQUEST FOR TRANSFORMATION RECEIVED | — |
| Sep 21, 2020 | TRDE | REQUEST FOR TRANSFORMATION DENIED | — |
| Aug 4, 2020 | LIME | LIMITATION FROM THE IB EXAMINED AND ENTERED | — |
| Aug 3, 2020 | COC. | CORRECTION UNDER SECTION 7 - PROCESSED | — |
| Jul 1, 2020 | ERFT | TEAS REQUEST FOR TRANSFORMATION RECEIVED | — |
| Jun 8, 2020 | TRDE | REQUEST FOR TRANSFORMATION DENIED | — |
| Jun 5, 2020 | LIMG | LIMITATION OF GOODS RECEIVED FROM IB | — |
| Mar 2, 2020 | ERFT | TEAS REQUEST FOR TRANSFORMATION RECEIVED | — |
| Apr 5, 2019 | INNP | PARTIAL INVALIDATION PROCESSED BY THE IB | — |
| Dec 28, 2018 | NREP | NEW REPRESENTATIVE AT IB RECEIVED | — |
| Dec 14, 2018 | INPS | PARTIAL INVALIDATION OF REG EXT PROTECTION SENT TO IB | — |
| Dec 14, 2018 | INPC | INVALIDATION PROCESSED | — |
| Dec 4, 2018 | INPR | PARTIAL INVALIDATION OF REG EXT PROTECTION CREATED | — |
| Apr 4, 2018 | NA71 | NOTICE OF ACCEPTANCE OF SEC. 71 - E-MAILED | — |
| Apr 4, 2018 | 71.P | REGISTERED - PARTIAL SEC 71 ACCEPTED | — |
| Apr 4, 2018 | APRE | CASE ASSIGNED TO POST REGISTRATION PARALEGAL | — |
| Mar 19, 2018 | ES71 | TEAS SECTION 71 RECEIVED | — |
| Sep 16, 2017 | REM4 | COURTESY REMINDER - SEC. 71 (10-YR) E-MAILED | — |
| Dec 15, 2016 | RNWL | INTERNATIONAL REGISTRATION RENEWED | — |
| Jul 14, 2016 | NREP | NEW REPRESENTATIVE AT IB RECEIVED | — |
| Feb 20, 2016 | INNP | PARTIAL INVALIDATION PROCESSED BY THE IB | — |
| Feb 1, 2016 | INPS | PARTIAL INVALIDATION OF REG EXT PROTECTION SENT TO IB | — |
| Feb 1, 2016 | INPC | INVALIDATION PROCESSED | — |
| Nov 19, 2015 | INPR | PARTIAL INVALIDATION OF REG EXT PROTECTION CREATED | — |
| Mar 19, 2015 | NA71 | NOTICE OF ACCEPTANCE OF SEC. 71 - E-MAILED | — |
| Mar 19, 2015 | 71.P | REGISTERED - PARTIAL SEC 71 ACCEPTED | — |
| Mar 18, 2015 | APRE | CASE ASSIGNED TO POST REGISTRATION PARALEGAL | — |
| Mar 13, 2015 | ES71 | TEAS SECTION 71 RECEIVED | — |
| Jan 6, 2013 | FINO | FINAL DECISION TRANSACTION PROCESSED BY IB | — |
| Nov 3, 2010 | PRA7 | REGISTERED - SEC. 7 REQUEST ABANDONED | — |
| Nov 6, 2009 | PRAM | POST REGISTRATION ACTION MAILED - SEC. 7 | — |
| Nov 6, 2009 | APRE | CASE ASSIGNED TO POST REGISTRATION PARALEGAL | — |
| Feb 13, 2009 | ES7R | TEAS SECTION 7 REQUEST RECEIVED | — |
| Jan 9, 2009 | FICS | FINAL DISPOSITION NOTICE SENT TO IB | — |
| Jan 8, 2009 | FIMP | FINAL DISPOSITION PROCESSED | — |
| Dec 16, 2008 | FICR | FINAL DISPOSITION NOTICE CREATED, TO BE SENT TO IB | — |
| Sep 16, 2008 | R.PR | REGISTERED-PRINCIPAL REGISTER | Your trademark is registered on the Principal Register — the strongest form of federal trademark protection. You may use the ® symbol for the covered goods and services. Maintenance filings (Section 8 and renewals) are required to keep the registration alive. |
| Jul 1, 2008 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| Jun 11, 2008 | NPUB | NOTICE OF PUBLICATION | — |
| May 27, 2008 | PREV | LAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED | — |
| May 22, 2008 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| May 7, 2008 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| May 7, 2008 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| May 7, 2008 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| May 7, 2008 | ERFR | TEAS REQUEST FOR RECONSIDERATION RECEIVED | — |
| Feb 4, 2008 | GNFN | NOTIFICATION OF FINAL REFUSAL EMAILED | — |
| Feb 4, 2008 | GNFR | FINAL REFUSAL E-MAILED | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| Feb 4, 2008 | CNFR | FINAL REFUSAL WRITTEN | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| Dec 19, 2007 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Dec 19, 2007 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Dec 19, 2007 | TROA | TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Oct 10, 2007 | ARAA | ATTORNEY/DOM.REP.REVOKED AND/OR APPOINTED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Oct 10, 2007 | REAP | TEAS REVOKE/APP/CHANGE ADDR OF ATTY/DOM REP RECEIVED | — |
| Aug 2, 2007 | RFNT | REFUSAL PROCESSED BY IB | — |
| Jul 13, 2007 | RFCS | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED - REFUSAL SENT TO IB | — |
| Jul 13, 2007 | RFRR | REFUSAL PROCESSED BY MPU | — |
| Jul 13, 2007 | RFCR | NON-FINAL ACTION (IB REFUSAL) PREPARED FOR REVIEW | — |
| Jul 12, 2007 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Jun 29, 2007 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Jun 29, 2007 | NWAP | NEW APPLICATION ENTERED | — |
| Jun 28, 2007 | REPR | SN ASSIGNED FOR SECT 66A APPL FROM IB | — |