Drawing for VAI

USPTO serial 79038730

VAI

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Status 402
Filing date
Status date
Registration date
—
Examiner
REGAN, JOHN B
Law office
TMO LAW OFFICE 113 - EXAMINING ATTORNEY ASSIGNED

What this means

This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.

Need help with VAI?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Owner

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
003Perfumery; essential oils; cosmetics; hair lotionsSECTION 70 - CANCELLED—
018Leather and imitations of leather and goods made of these materials (included in this class); bags (included in this class); trunks and travelling bags; rucksacksSECTION 70 - CANCELLED—
025Clothing; footwear; headgear; belts (clothing)SECTION 70 - CANCELLED—

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

DateCodeEventWhat it means
Nov 25, 2017DENANOTIFICATION OF EFFECT OF CANCELLATION OF INTL REG MAILED—
Nov 24, 2017DETHDEATH OF INTERNATIONAL REGISTRATION—
May 8, 2009FINTFINAL DECISION TRANSACTION PROCESSED BY IB—
Apr 1, 2009FICSFINAL DISPOSITION NOTICE SENT TO IB—
Apr 1, 2009FICRFINAL DISPOSITION NOTICE CREATED, TO BE SENT TO IB—
Dec 19, 2008OPNXNOTIFICATION OF POSSIBLE OPPOSITION - PROCESSED BY IB—
Dec 4, 2008OPNSNOTIFICATION OF POSSIBLE OPPOSITION SENT TO IB—
Dec 4, 2008OPNRNOTIFICATION OF POSSIBLE OPPOSITION CREATED, TO BE SENT TO IB—
May 15, 2008NREPNEW REPRESENTATIVE AT IB RECEIVED—
Apr 1, 2008MAB2ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - FAILURE TO RESPONDThe trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time.
Apr 1, 2008ABN2ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSEThe trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time.
Sep 1, 2007RFNTREFUSAL PROCESSED BY IB—
Aug 14, 2007RFCSNON-FINAL ACTION MAILED - REFUSAL SENT TO IB—
Aug 14, 2007RFRRREFUSAL PROCESSED BY MPU—
Aug 14, 2007RFCRNON-FINAL ACTION (IB REFUSAL) PREPARED FOR REVIEW—
Aug 13, 2007CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION WRITTENA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Aug 7, 2007DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
Jun 29, 2007NWAPNEW APPLICATION ENTERED—
Jun 28, 2007REPRSN ASSIGNED FOR SECT 66A APPL FROM IB—

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance