Drawing for SÖKTAS

USPTO serial 79038750

SÖKTAS

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Reg. 3458282Status 706Registered
Filing date
Status date
Registration date
Jul 1, 2008
Examiner
VOHRA, SANJEEV KUMAR
Law office
GENERIC WEB UPDATE

What this means

This trademark is registered with the USPTO. Monitoring new filings can help you catch lookalike marks early.

Need help with SÖKTAS?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Owner

Attorney of record

The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.

JOHN S. EGBERT

JOHN S. EGBERT EGBERT LAW OFFICES, PLLC1001 Texas Ave., Ste. 1250HOUSTON, TX 77002UNITED STATES

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
024Woven and non-woven fabrics for the manufacture of clothing, namely, cotton fabrics, nylon fabrics, polyester fabrics, woven linen fabrics, hemp-cotton mixed fabrics, cotton-nylon mixed fabrics, cotton-polyester mixed fabrics, fiberglass fabrics for textile use; fabric impervious to gases for aeronautical balloons; waterproof fabric for manufacturing clothing, furniture and automobile upholstery; fabric of imitation animal skins; textile linings, namely, linen lining fabric for shoes, textile used as lining for clothing; buckram; filtering materials of textile, namely, chemical fiber fabrics, synthetic fiber fabrics, inorganic fiber mixed fabrics all for use in filtering liquids and powders; yarn dyed shirting fabrics, plain dyed fabrics used in the manufacture of sportswear, upholstery fabricsACTIVE—

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

DateCodeEventWhat it means
Jan 14, 2023NREPNEW REPRESENTATIVE AT IB RECEIVED—
May 2, 2019NREPNEW REPRESENTATIVE AT IB RECEIVED—
Jul 23, 2018NA71NOTICE OF ACCEPTANCE OF SEC. 71 - E-MAILED—
Jul 23, 201871AGREGISTERED-SEC.71 ACCEPTED—
Jul 18, 2018APRECASE ASSIGNED TO POST REGISTRATION PARALEGAL—
Jun 26, 2018ES71TEAS SECTION 71 RECEIVED—
Jul 1, 2017REM4COURTESY REMINDER - SEC. 71 (10-YR) E-MAILED—
Mar 23, 2017RNWLINTERNATIONAL REGISTRATION RENEWED—
Jan 20, 2014NA75NOTICE OF ACCEPTANCE OF SEC. 71 & 15 - E-MAILED—
Jan 20, 2014C75AREGISTERED - SEC. 71 ACCEPTED & SEC. 15 ACK.—
Jan 9, 2014APRECASE ASSIGNED TO POST REGISTRATION PARALEGAL—
Dec 13, 2013715FREGISTERED - SEC. 71 & SEC. 15 FILED—
Dec 13, 2013ES75TEAS SECTION 71 & 15 RECEIVED—
Nov 14, 2008FINVFINAL DECISION TRANSACTION PROCESSED BY IB—
Oct 17, 2008FICSFINAL DISPOSITION NOTICE SENT TO IB—
Oct 17, 2008FIMPFINAL DISPOSITION PROCESSED—
Oct 1, 2008FICRFINAL DISPOSITION NOTICE CREATED, TO BE SENT TO IB—
Jul 10, 2008CHLDCHANGE OF OWNER RECEIVED FROM IB—
Jul 1, 2008R.PRREGISTERED-PRINCIPAL REGISTERYour trademark is registered on the Principal Register — the strongest form of federal trademark protection. You may use the ® symbol for the covered goods and services. Maintenance filings (Section 8 and renewals) are required to keep the registration alive.
Apr 15, 2008PUBOPUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITIONYour mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance.
Mar 26, 2008NPUBNOTICE OF PUBLICATION—
Mar 12, 2008PREVLAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED—
Mar 12, 2008ALIEASSIGNED TO LIE—
Feb 19, 2008CNSAAPPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER—
Jan 22, 2008TEMETEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED—
Jan 21, 2008CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Jan 21, 2008TROATEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVEDThis event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action.
Jan 21, 2008TCCATEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED—
Aug 17, 2007RFNTREFUSAL PROCESSED BY IB—
Jul 24, 2007RFCSNON-FINAL ACTION MAILED - REFUSAL SENT TO IB—
Jul 24, 2007RFRRREFUSAL PROCESSED BY MPU—
Jul 22, 2007RFCRNON-FINAL ACTION (IB REFUSAL) PREPARED FOR REVIEW—
Jul 21, 2007CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION WRITTENA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Jun 29, 2007DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
Jun 29, 2007NWAPNEW APPLICATION ENTERED—
Jun 28, 2007REPRSN ASSIGNED FOR SECT 66A APPL FROM IB—

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance