Drawing for STEELORBIS CONNECTING MARKETS

USPTO serial 79038757

STEELORBIS CONNECTING MARKETS

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Reg. 3554276Status 706Registered
Filing date
Status date
Registration date
Dec 30, 2008
Examiner
DELANEY, ZHALEH SYBIL
Law office
GENERIC WEB UPDATE

What this means

This trademark is registered with the USPTO. Monitoring new filings can help you catch lookalike marks early.

Need help with STEELORBIS CONNECTING MARKETS?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Owner

Attorney of record

The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.

John S. Egbert

John S. Egbert Egbert, McDaniel & Swartz, PLLC1001 Texas Ave., Ste. 1250Houston, TX 77002UNITED STATES

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
041Education in the field of computers and electronic commerce of irons and steels rendered through correspondence courses; organization of symposia and congresses in the field of electronic commerce; arranging of conferences, congresses, speeches, and symposia in the field of electronic commerce; publication of books, magazines and newspapersACTIVE—

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

DateCodeEventWhat it means
Jan 20, 2023NREPNEW REPRESENTATIVE AT IB RECEIVED—
Jan 2, 2019NA71NOTICE OF ACCEPTANCE OF SEC. 71 - E-MAILED—
Jan 2, 201971AGREGISTERED-SEC.71 ACCEPTED—
Dec 28, 2018ES71TEAS SECTION 71 RECEIVED—
Dec 30, 2017REM4COURTESY REMINDER - SEC. 71 (10-YR) E-MAILED—
Nov 24, 2016RNWLINTERNATIONAL REGISTRATION RENEWED—
Oct 27, 2016NREPNEW REPRESENTATIVE AT IB RECEIVED—
Feb 5, 2015NA75NOTICE OF ACCEPTANCE OF SEC. 71 & 15 - E-MAILED—
Feb 5, 2015C75AREGISTERED - SEC. 71 ACCEPTED & SEC. 15 ACK.—
Feb 4, 2015APRECASE ASSIGNED TO POST REGISTRATION PARALEGAL—
Jan 15, 2015ES75TEAS SECTION 71 & 15 RECEIVED—
May 8, 2009FINVFINAL DECISION TRANSACTION PROCESSED BY IB—
Apr 8, 2009FICSFINAL DISPOSITION NOTICE SENT TO IB—
Apr 8, 2009FIMPFINAL DISPOSITION PROCESSED—
Mar 30, 2009FICRFINAL DISPOSITION NOTICE CREATED, TO BE SENT TO IB—
Dec 30, 2008R.PRREGISTERED-PRINCIPAL REGISTERYour trademark is registered on the Principal Register — the strongest form of federal trademark protection. You may use the ® symbol for the covered goods and services. Maintenance filings (Section 8 and renewals) are required to keep the registration alive.
Dec 19, 2008OPNXNOTIFICATION OF POSSIBLE OPPOSITION - PROCESSED BY IB—
Dec 4, 2008OPNSNOTIFICATION OF POSSIBLE OPPOSITION SENT TO IB—
Dec 4, 2008OPNRNOTIFICATION OF POSSIBLE OPPOSITION CREATED, TO BE SENT TO IB—
Oct 14, 2008PUBOPUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITIONYour mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance.
Sep 24, 2008NPUBNOTICE OF PUBLICATION—
Sep 8, 2008PREVLAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED—
Sep 5, 2008CNSAAPPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER—
Aug 21, 2008TEMETEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED—
Aug 21, 2008CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Aug 14, 2008TROATEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVEDThis event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action.
Feb 19, 2008CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Feb 15, 2008CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION WRITTENA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Nov 15, 2007CHLDCHANGE OF OWNER RECEIVED FROM IB—
Oct 23, 2007CHANAPPLICANT/CORRESPONDENCE CHANGES (NON-RESPONSIVE) ENTERED—
Oct 23, 2007ALIEASSIGNED TO LIE—
Sep 16, 2007TROATEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVEDThis event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action.
Sep 16, 2007TCCATEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED—
Jul 27, 2007RFNTREFUSAL PROCESSED BY IB—
Jul 6, 2007RFCSNON-FINAL ACTION MAILED - REFUSAL SENT TO IB—
Jul 6, 2007RFRRREFUSAL PROCESSED BY MPU—
Jul 6, 2007RFCRNON-FINAL ACTION (IB REFUSAL) PREPARED FOR REVIEW—
Jul 5, 2007CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION WRITTENA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Jul 2, 2007DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
Jul 2, 2007NWAPNEW APPLICATION ENTERED—
Jun 29, 2007LIMSLIMITATION OF GOODS/SERVICES FROM IB ENTERED—
Jun 28, 2007REPRSN ASSIGNED FOR SECT 66A APPL FROM IB—

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance