Drawing for MIRPLUS

USPTO serial 79038766

MIRPLUS

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Reg. 3488854Status 404
Filing date
Status date
Registration date
Aug 19, 2008
Examiner
JUN, WON KYUNG WENDY
Law office
PUBLICATION AND ISSUE SECTION

What this means

This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.

Need help with MIRPLUS?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Owner

Attorney of record

The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.

Joseph T. Nabor

Joseph T. Nabor Fitch Even Tabin & Flannery120 South LaSalle StreetSuite 1600Chicago, IL 60603

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
001Chemical, biochemical and biological preparations and reagents for industrial, scientific, agricultural, horticultural and forestry purposes, except fungicides, herbicides, insecticides and parasiticidesSECTION 71 - CANCELLED—
005Chemical, biochemical and biological preparations and reagents for medical and veterinary purposesSECTION 71 - CANCELLED—
035Compilation and systemization of information into computer databasesSECTION 71 - CANCELLED—

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

DateCodeEventWhat it means
Oct 27, 2017DENCNOTIFICATION OF EFFECT OF CANCELLATION OF INTL REG E-MAILED—
Oct 27, 2017DETHDEATH OF INTERNATIONAL REGISTRATION—
Mar 2, 2017NREPNEW REPRESENTATIVE AT IB RECEIVED—
Feb 20, 2016INNTTOTAL INVALIDATION PROCESSED BY THE IB—
Feb 1, 2016INTSTOTAL INVALIDATION OF REG EXT PROTECTION SENT TO IB—
Feb 1, 2016INPCINVALIDATION PROCESSED—
Nov 20, 2015INTRTOTAL INVALIDATION OF REG EXT PROTECTION CREATED—
Mar 20, 2015C71TCANCELLED SECTION 71—
Dec 30, 2012FINOFINAL DECISION TRANSACTION PROCESSED BY IB—
Dec 10, 2008FICSFINAL DISPOSITION NOTICE SENT TO IB—
Dec 10, 2008FIMPFINAL DISPOSITION PROCESSED—
Nov 19, 2008FICRFINAL DISPOSITION NOTICE CREATED, TO BE SENT TO IB—
Oct 20, 2008TCCATEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED—
Oct 9, 2008UNDNUNDELIVERABLE MAIL - NO ACTION TAKEN—
Aug 19, 2008R.PRREGISTERED-PRINCIPAL REGISTERYour trademark is registered on the Principal Register — the strongest form of federal trademark protection. You may use the ® symbol for the covered goods and services. Maintenance filings (Section 8 and renewals) are required to keep the registration alive.
Jun 3, 2008PUBOPUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITIONYour mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance.
May 14, 2008NPUBNOTICE OF PUBLICATION—
Apr 30, 2008UNDNUNDELIVERABLE MAIL - NO ACTION TAKEN—
Apr 25, 2008PREVLAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED—
Apr 25, 2008CNSAAPPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER—
Apr 16, 2008TEMETEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED—
Apr 16, 2008CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Apr 16, 2008TROATEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVEDThis event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action.
Mar 24, 2008CPRAPRIORITY ACTION MAILEDA priority action is a type of Office Action the USPTO treats as time-sensitive. It usually means the examining attorney needs a specific response or amendment quickly — often relating to a foreign priority claim or a formal requirement. Respond within the stated deadline.
Mar 21, 2008CPRAPRIORITY ACTION WRITTENA priority action is a type of Office Action the USPTO treats as time-sensitive. It usually means the examining attorney needs a specific response or amendment quickly — often relating to a foreign priority claim or a formal requirement. Respond within the stated deadline.
Mar 13, 2008ZZZXPREVIOUS ALLOWANCE COUNT WITHDRAWN—
Mar 1, 2008PBCRWITHDRAWN FROM PUB - OG REVIEW QUERY—
Feb 20, 2008PREVLAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED—
Feb 20, 2008ALIEASSIGNED TO LIE—
Jan 18, 2008CNSAAPPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER—
Jan 10, 2008TEMETEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED—
Jan 9, 2008CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Jan 9, 2008TROATEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVEDThis event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action.
Aug 2, 2007RFNTREFUSAL PROCESSED BY IB—
Jul 17, 2007RFCSNON-FINAL ACTION MAILED - REFUSAL SENT TO IB—
Jul 17, 2007RFRRREFUSAL PROCESSED BY MPU—
Jul 17, 2007RFCRNON-FINAL ACTION (IB REFUSAL) PREPARED FOR REVIEW—
Jul 16, 2007CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION WRITTENA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Jul 13, 2007DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
Jun 29, 2007NWAPNEW APPLICATION ENTERED—
Jun 28, 2007REPRSN ASSIGNED FOR SECT 66A APPL FROM IB—

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance