Drawing for TANNER

USPTO serial 79038773

TANNER

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Reg. 3445493Status 404
Filing date
Status date
Registration date
Jun 10, 2008
Examiner
EVANKO, PATRICIA MALESARDI
Law office

What this means

This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.

Need help with TANNER?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Owner

Attorney of record

The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.

BARRY L. KELMACHTER

BARRY L. KELMACHTER BACHMAN & LAPOINTE, P.C.900 CHAPEL STREETSUITE 1201NEW HAVEN, CT 06510

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
007Tying apparatus [ for hay ], in particular banderoling machines and loop banding machines and parts thereforeSECTION 71 - CANCELLED
022Bands, not of metal, for wrapping or binding, in particular for banderoling machines and loop banding machines, of paper, of plastic materials and of compositesSECTION 71 - CANCELLED

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

DateCodeEventWhat it means
Oct 6, 2017DENCNOTIFICATION OF EFFECT OF CANCELLATION OF INTL REG MAILED
Oct 6, 2017DETHDEATH OF INTERNATIONAL REGISTRATION
Feb 2, 2017ADCHCHANGE OF NAME/ADDRESS REC'D FROM IB
Oct 16, 2015INNTTOTAL INVALIDATION PROCESSED BY THE IB
Sep 30, 2015INTSTOTAL INVALIDATION OF REG EXT PROTECTION SENT TO IB
Sep 30, 2015INPCINVALIDATION PROCESSED
Sep 16, 2015INTRTOTAL INVALIDATION OF REG EXT PROTECTION CREATED
May 15, 2015NREPNEW REPRESENTATIVE AT IB RECEIVED
Jan 16, 2015C71TCANCELLED SECTION 71
Apr 26, 2013INNAINVALIDATION REVIEWED - NO ACTION REQUIRED BY OFFICE
Apr 7, 2013FINOFINAL DECISION TRANSACTION PROCESSED BY IB
Aug 5, 2011INPRPARTIAL INVALIDATION OF REG EXT PROTECTION CREATED
Nov 5, 2010PC.DPETITION TO DIRECTOR DISMISSED
Nov 5, 2010COC.CORRECTION UNDER SECTION 7 - PROCESSED
Oct 12, 2010APETASSIGNED TO PETITION STAFF
Sep 3, 2010PCRCPETITION TO DIRECTOR RECEIVED
Sep 3, 2010MAILPAPER RECEIVED
Mar 1, 2010PRAMPOST REGISTRATION ACTION MAILED - SEC. 7
Feb 4, 2010APRECASE ASSIGNED TO POST REGISTRATION PARALEGAL
Aug 17, 2009AMD7SEC 7 REQUEST FILED
Aug 17, 2009MAILPAPER RECEIVED
May 14, 2009CHLDCHANGE OF OWNER RECEIVED FROM IB
Feb 14, 2009CORVREVIEW OF CORRESPONDENCE COMPLETE
Feb 13, 2009APETASSIGNED TO PETITION STAFF
Feb 11, 2009FAXXFAX RECEIVED
Sep 29, 2008FICSFINAL DISPOSITION NOTICE SENT TO IB
Sep 29, 2008FIMPFINAL DISPOSITION PROCESSED
Sep 11, 2008FICRFINAL DISPOSITION NOTICE CREATED, TO BE SENT TO IB
Jun 10, 2008R.PRREGISTERED-PRINCIPAL REGISTERYour trademark is registered on the Principal Register — the strongest form of federal trademark protection. You may use the ® symbol for the covered goods and services. Maintenance filings (Section 8 and renewals) are required to keep the registration alive.
Jun 9, 2008CORVREVIEW OF CORRESPONDENCE COMPLETE
May 22, 2008CRCVCORRECTION TRANSACTION RECEIVED FROM IB
May 7, 2008FAXXFAX RECEIVED
Mar 25, 2008PUBOPUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITIONYour mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance.
Mar 5, 2008NPUBNOTICE OF PUBLICATION
Feb 27, 2008TROATEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVEDThis event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action.
Feb 19, 2008PREVLAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED
Feb 19, 2008ALIEASSIGNED TO LIE
Jan 17, 2008CNSAAPPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER
Jan 17, 2008XAECEXAMINER'S AMENDMENT ENTERED
Jan 17, 2008GNENNOTIFICATION OF EXAMINERS AMENDMENT E-MAILED
Jan 17, 2008GNEAEXAMINERS AMENDMENT E-MAILED
Jan 17, 2008CNEAEXAMINERS AMENDMENT -WRITTEN
Jan 8, 2008TCCATEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED
Jan 8, 2008TEMETEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED
Jan 8, 2008CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE
Jan 8, 2008TROATEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVEDThis event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action.
Aug 2, 2007RFNPREFUSAL PROCESSED BY IB
Jul 17, 2007RFCSNON-FINAL ACTION MAILED - REFUSAL SENT TO IB
Jul 17, 2007RFRRREFUSAL PROCESSED BY MPU
Jul 10, 2007RFCRNON-FINAL ACTION (IB REFUSAL) PREPARED FOR REVIEW
Jul 9, 2007CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION WRITTENA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Jul 9, 2007RFWRNON-FINAL ACTION (IB REFUSAL) WITHDRAWN FOR REVIEW
Jul 7, 2007RFCRNON-FINAL ACTION (IB REFUSAL) PREPARED FOR REVIEW
Jul 6, 2007CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION WRITTENA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Jul 3, 2007DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER
Jul 2, 2007NWAPNEW APPLICATION ENTERED
Jun 29, 2007LIMSLIMITATION OF GOODS/SERVICES FROM IB ENTERED
Jun 28, 2007REPRSN ASSIGNED FOR SECT 66A APPL FROM IB

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance