Where is the live CopyMark page for USPTO serial 79038776?

The live record is at https://getcopymark.com/trademark/79038776. Use https://getcopymark.com/trademark/{serialNumber} for any 8-digit USPTO serial.

Who owns DEUTSCHE STEINZEUG?

According to the public USPTO record for serial number 79038776, the listed owner(s) include: Deutsche Steinzeug Cremer & Breuer AG, Deutsche Steinzeug Cremer & Breuer AG, Deutsche Steinzeug Solar Ceramics GmbH, Deutsche Steinzeug Cremer & Breuer AG.

What is USPTO serial number 79038776?

Serial number 79038776 is the USPTO application identifier for the mark DEUTSCHE STEINZEUG. It is used to track examination, publication, and registration of this trademark.

What is the current status of DEUTSCHE STEINZEUG?

DEUTSCHE STEINZEUG (79038776) currently shows USPTO status code 706 on the public record. This trademark is registered with the USPTO. Monitoring new filings can help you catch lookalike marks early.

Which trademark classes cover DEUTSCHE STEINZEUG?

The public record lists International Classes: 019. Each class corresponds to categories of goods or services identified in the application or registration.

USPTO serial 79038776

DEUTSCHE STEINZEUG

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Reg. 3564806Status 706Registered

Filing date: Jun 4, 2007
Status date: Nov 15, 2018
Registration date: Jan 20, 2009
Examiner: BLANE, SUZANNE
Law office: GENERIC WEB UPDATE

What this means

This trademark is registered with the USPTO. Monitoring new filings can help you catch lookalike marks early.

Need help with DEUTSCHE STEINZEUG?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner

Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.

Trademark Monitoring

(312) 319-4460

Not the owner?

File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Start a new application

(312) 319-4460

Owner

Attorney of record

The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.

Jay F. Moldovanyi

Jay F. Moldovanyi Fay Sharpe LLP1228 Euclid Ave 5th FlrCleveland, OH 44115UNITED STATES

Goods and services

Class	Description	Status	First use
019	ceramic building materials, namely, tiles, floor, wall, façade and mosaic panels, ceramic paving stones [, roofing tiles ]	ACTIVE	—

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

Date	Code	Event	What it means
Sep 5, 2025	RHRD	RESTRICTION OF HOLDER'S RIGHT OF DISPOSAL RECEIVED	—
Jul 25, 2025	NREP	NEW REPRESENTATIVE AT IB RECEIVED	—
Jul 23, 2025	CHLD	CHANGE OF OWNER RECEIVED FROM IB	—
Feb 26, 2022	NREP	NEW REPRESENTATIVE AT IB RECEIVED	—
Oct 25, 2019	INNP	PARTIAL INVALIDATION PROCESSED BY THE IB	—
Aug 2, 2019	INPS	PARTIAL INVALIDATION OF REG EXT PROTECTION SENT TO IB	—
Aug 2, 2019	INPC	INVALIDATION PROCESSED	—
Jul 15, 2019	INPR	PARTIAL INVALIDATION OF REG EXT PROTECTION CREATED	—
Nov 15, 2018	NA71	NOTICE OF ACCEPTANCE OF SEC. 71 - E-MAILED	—
Nov 15, 2018	71AG	REGISTERED-SEC.71 ACCEPTED	—
Nov 8, 2018	ES71	TEAS SECTION 71 RECEIVED	—
Jun 22, 2017	RNWL	INTERNATIONAL REGISTRATION RENEWED	—
Aug 20, 2015	NREP	NEW REPRESENTATIVE AT IB RECEIVED	—
May 19, 2015	ARAA	ATTORNEY/DOM.REP.REVOKED AND/OR APPOINTED	This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action.
May 19, 2015	REAP	TEAS REVOKE/APP/CHANGE ADDR OF ATTY/DOM REP RECEIVED	—
Apr 23, 2015	ARAA	ATTORNEY/DOM.REP.REVOKED AND/OR APPOINTED	This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action.
Apr 23, 2015	REAP	TEAS REVOKE/APP/CHANGE ADDR OF ATTY/DOM REP RECEIVED	—
Apr 8, 2015	TCCA	TEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED	—
Dec 12, 2014	ADCH	CHANGE OF NAME/ADDRESS REC'D FROM IB	—
Dec 1, 2014	NA75	NOTICE OF ACCEPTANCE OF SEC. 71 & 15 - E-MAILED	—
Dec 1, 2014	C75A	REGISTERED - SEC. 71 ACCEPTED & SEC. 15 ACK.	—
Dec 1, 2014	APRE	CASE ASSIGNED TO POST REGISTRATION PARALEGAL	—
Nov 17, 2014	ES75	TEAS SECTION 71 & 15 RECEIVED	—
Jan 6, 2013	FINO	FINAL DECISION TRANSACTION PROCESSED BY IB	—
Jan 4, 2013	LIMN	LIMITATION FROM THE IB EXAMINED, NO ACTION IS NEEDED	—
Dec 21, 2012	RHRD	RESTRICTION OF HOLDER'S RIGHT OF DISPOSAL RECEIVED	—
Jan 26, 2011	LIMN	LIMITATION FROM THE IB EXAMINED, NO ACTION IS NEEDED	—
Dec 10, 2010	RHRD	RESTRICTION OF HOLDER'S RIGHT OF DISPOSAL RECEIVED	—
May 4, 2009	FICS	FINAL DISPOSITION NOTICE SENT TO IB	—
May 4, 2009	FIMP	FINAL DISPOSITION PROCESSED	—
Apr 20, 2009	FICR	FINAL DISPOSITION NOTICE CREATED, TO BE SENT TO IB	—
Jan 20, 2009	R.PR	REGISTERED-PRINCIPAL REGISTER	Your trademark is registered on the Principal Register — the strongest form of federal trademark protection. You may use the ® symbol for the covered goods and services. Maintenance filings (Section 8 and renewals) are required to keep the registration alive.
Dec 19, 2008	OPNX	NOTIFICATION OF POSSIBLE OPPOSITION - PROCESSED BY IB	—
Dec 4, 2008	OPNS	NOTIFICATION OF POSSIBLE OPPOSITION SENT TO IB	—
Dec 4, 2008	OPNR	NOTIFICATION OF POSSIBLE OPPOSITION CREATED, TO BE SENT TO IB	—
Nov 4, 2008	PUBO	PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION	Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance.
Oct 15, 2008	NPUB	NOTICE OF PUBLICATION	—
Sep 29, 2008	PREV	LAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED	—
Sep 29, 2008	ALIE	ASSIGNED TO LIE	—
Sep 19, 2008	CNEA	EXAMINERS AMENDMENT MAILED	—
Sep 18, 2008	CNSA	APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER	—
Sep 18, 2008	XAEC	EXAMINER'S AMENDMENT ENTERED	—
Sep 18, 2008	CNEA	EXAMINERS AMENDMENT -WRITTEN	—
Jul 3, 2008	TEME	TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED	—
Jul 3, 2008	CRFA	CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE	—
Jul 3, 2008	TROA	TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVED	This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action.
Jul 3, 2008	NREP	NEW REPRESENTATIVE AT IB RECEIVED	—
Apr 1, 2008	CNRT	NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED	A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Mar 31, 2008	CNRT	NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN	A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Mar 11, 2008	TEME	TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED	—
Mar 11, 2008	CRFA	CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE	—
Mar 11, 2008	TROA	TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVED	This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action.
Nov 2, 2007	RFNT	REFUSAL PROCESSED BY IB	—
Sep 17, 2007	RFCS	NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED - REFUSAL SENT TO IB	—
Sep 17, 2007	RFRR	REFUSAL PROCESSED BY MPU	—
Sep 16, 2007	RFCR	NON-FINAL ACTION (IB REFUSAL) PREPARED FOR REVIEW	—
Sep 15, 2007	CNRT	NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN	A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Sep 12, 2007	DOCK	ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER	—
Jun 29, 2007	NWAP	NEW APPLICATION ENTERED	—
Jun 28, 2007	REPR	SN ASSIGNED FOR SECT 66A APPL FROM IB	—