Drawing for RACE-TEC

USPTO serial 79038783

RACE-TEC

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Status 402
Filing date
Status date
Registration date
—
Examiner
MEIER, SHARON A
Law office
TMO LAW OFFICE 112 - EXAMINING ATTORNEY ASSIGNED

What this means

This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.

Need help with RACE-TEC?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Owner

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
017fluid seals, oil seals, grease seals and non-metal sealing gaskets, all for sealing engines, transmissions and hubs of automobilesSECTION 70 - CANCELLED—

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

DateCodeEventWhat it means
Aug 26, 2017DENANOTIFICATION OF EFFECT OF CANCELLATION OF INTL REG MAILED—
Aug 25, 2017DETHDEATH OF INTERNATIONAL REGISTRATION—
Feb 5, 2010FINTFINAL DECISION TRANSACTION PROCESSED BY IB—
Nov 11, 2009FICSFINAL DISPOSITION NOTICE SENT TO IB—
Nov 11, 2009FICRFINAL DISPOSITION NOTICE CREATED, TO BE SENT TO IB—
Dec 19, 2008OPNXNOTIFICATION OF POSSIBLE OPPOSITION - PROCESSED BY IB—
Dec 4, 2008OPNSNOTIFICATION OF POSSIBLE OPPOSITION SENT TO IB—
Dec 4, 2008OPNRNOTIFICATION OF POSSIBLE OPPOSITION CREATED, TO BE SENT TO IB—
Nov 12, 2008MAB2ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - FAILURE TO RESPONDThe trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time.
Nov 11, 2008ABN2ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSEThe trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time.
Apr 15, 2008CNFRFINAL REFUSAL MAILEDA final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon.
Apr 14, 2008CNFRFINAL REFUSAL WRITTENA final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon.
Feb 12, 2008ACECAMENDMENT FROM APPLICANT ENTERED—
Feb 12, 2008CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Feb 12, 2008ALIEASSIGNED TO LIE—
Jan 7, 2008FAXXFAX RECEIVED—
Aug 2, 2007RFNTREFUSAL PROCESSED BY IB—
Jul 9, 2007RFCSNON-FINAL ACTION MAILED - REFUSAL SENT TO IB—
Jul 9, 2007RFRRREFUSAL PROCESSED BY MPU—
Jul 8, 2007RFCRNON-FINAL ACTION (IB REFUSAL) PREPARED FOR REVIEW—
Jul 7, 2007CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION WRITTENA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Jun 29, 2007DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
Jun 29, 2007NWAPNEW APPLICATION ENTERED—
Jun 28, 2007REPRSN ASSIGNED FOR SECT 66A APPL FROM IB—

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance