Drawing for KEYSTER

USPTO serial 79038786

KEYSTER

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Reg. 3476810Status 404
Filing date
Status date
Registration date
Jul 29, 2008
Examiner
BELENKER, ESTHER
Law office
TMO LAW OFFICE 111

What this means

This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.

Need help with KEYSTER?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Owner

Attorney of record

The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.

Thomas J. Moore

Thomas J. Moore BACON & THOMAS, PLLC625 Slaters Lane, Fourth FloorAlexandria, VA 22314UNITED STATES

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
007carburetors for internal combustion engines; spark plugs for internal combustion enginesSECTION 71 - CANCELLED—
012Internal combustion engines for land vehiclesSECTION 71 - CANCELLED—

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

DateCodeEventWhat it means
Oct 27, 2017DENCNOTIFICATION OF EFFECT OF CANCELLATION OF INTL REG MAILED—
Oct 27, 2017DETHDEATH OF INTERNATIONAL REGISTRATION—
Mar 24, 2017INNTTOTAL INVALIDATION PROCESSED BY THE IB—
Jan 10, 2017XXSSGENERIC MADRID TRANSACTION SENT TO IB—
Jan 10, 2017XXCRGENERIC MADRID TRANSACTION CREATED—
Oct 26, 2016INTRTOTAL INVALIDATION OF REG EXT PROTECTION CREATED—
Feb 26, 2016C71TCANCELLED SECTION 71—
Feb 24, 2016PRANPOST REGISTRATION ACTION MAILED NO RESPONSE REQUIRED—
Jun 6, 2014EROPTEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION-POST REG RECEIVED—
Jan 16, 2014PR71POST REGISTRATION ACTION MAILED - SEC.71—
Jan 16, 2014APRECASE ASSIGNED TO POST REGISTRATION PARALEGAL—
Dec 18, 2013ES71TEAS SECTION 71 RECEIVED—
Dec 14, 2008FINVFINAL DECISION TRANSACTION PROCESSED BY IB—
Nov 17, 2008FICSFINAL DISPOSITION NOTICE SENT TO IB—
Nov 17, 2008FIMPFINAL DISPOSITION PROCESSED—
Oct 29, 2008FICRFINAL DISPOSITION NOTICE CREATED, TO BE SENT TO IB—
Jul 29, 2008R.PRREGISTERED-PRINCIPAL REGISTERYour trademark is registered on the Principal Register — the strongest form of federal trademark protection. You may use the ® symbol for the covered goods and services. Maintenance filings (Section 8 and renewals) are required to keep the registration alive.
May 13, 2008PUBOPUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITIONYour mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance.
Apr 23, 2008NPUBNOTICE OF PUBLICATION—
Apr 7, 2008PREVLAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED—
Apr 2, 2008CNSAAPPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER—
Apr 2, 2008TEMETEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED—
Apr 2, 2008CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Apr 2, 2008ALIEASSIGNED TO LIE—
Mar 25, 2008ARAAATTORNEY/DOM.REP.REVOKED AND/OR APPOINTEDThis event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action.
Mar 25, 2008REAPTEAS REVOKE/APP/CHANGE ADDR OF ATTY/DOM REP RECEIVED—
Mar 25, 2008TROATEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVEDThis event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action.
Mar 25, 2008PETGPETITION TO REVIVE-GRANTED—
Mar 25, 2008PROATEAS PETITION TO REVIVE RECEIVED—
Feb 20, 2008MAB2ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - FAILURE TO RESPONDThe trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time.
Feb 20, 2008ABN2ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSEThe trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time.
Aug 17, 2007RFNTREFUSAL PROCESSED BY IB—
Jul 24, 2007RFCSNON-FINAL ACTION MAILED - REFUSAL SENT TO IB—
Jul 24, 2007RFRRREFUSAL PROCESSED BY MPU—
Jul 24, 2007RFCRNON-FINAL ACTION (IB REFUSAL) PREPARED FOR REVIEW—
Jul 23, 2007CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION WRITTENA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Jul 23, 2007DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
Jun 29, 2007NWAPNEW APPLICATION ENTERED—
Jun 28, 2007REPRSN ASSIGNED FOR SECT 66A APPL FROM IB—

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance