USPTO serial 79038872
STEELCRASH
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
Reg. 3501959Status 404
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- Sep 16, 2008
- Examiner
- SMITH, REBECCA A
- Law office
- PUBLICATION AND ISSUE SECTION
What this means
This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.
Need help with STEELCRASH?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
ARCELOR COMMERCIAL FCSE S.A.,; Société anonyme
LUXEMBOURG, LU
Other trademarks owned by ARCELOR COMMERCIAL FCSE S.A.,; Société anonyme
ARCELOR COMMERCIAL FCSE S.A.,; Société anonyme
LUXEMBOURG, LU
Other trademarks owned by ARCELOR COMMERCIAL FCSE S.A.,; Société anonyme
ArcelorMittal Flat Carbon Europe SA
LU
Other trademarks owned by ArcelorMittal Flat Carbon Europe SA
ArcelorMittal Flat Carbon Europe SA
LU
Other trademarks owned by ArcelorMittal Flat Carbon Europe SA
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Edward M. Prince
Edward M. Prince Alston & Bird LLP950 F Street, N.W.The Atlantic BuildingWashington, DC 20004-1404Goods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 006 | Common metals and their alloys, namely, unprocessed or semi-processed steel, steel, stainless steel, coated steel, carbon steel, clad steel, chromium steel, galvanized steel, electrogalvanized steel, unprocessed iron, and semi-processed iron in the form of sheet metal, coated sheet metal, multilayered sheet metal and metal beams | SECTION 71 - CANCELLED | — |
| 012 | Metal parts for motor vehicles, namely, bumpers, hoods, automobile bodies, cross bars for automobiles, suspension systems for automobiles, and automobile body kits comprising external structural parts of automobiles, and automobile chassis; metal structural parts for rail cars; and metal couplings for rail cars | SECTION 71 - CANCELLED | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
- Other trademarks owned by ARCELOR COMMERCIAL FCSE S.A.,; Société anonyme
- Other trademarks owned by ARCELOR COMMERCIAL FCSE S.A.,; Société anonyme
- Other trademarks owned by ArcelorMittal Flat Carbon Europe SA
- Other trademarks owned by ArcelorMittal Flat Carbon Europe SA
- Other trademarks in Class 006
- Other trademarks in Class 012
- Similar marks named STEELCRASH
- Recently changed USPTO trademarks
- Recently filed trademarks
- Browse all trademark records
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Nov 10, 2017 | DENC | NOTIFICATION OF EFFECT OF CANCELLATION OF INTL REG MAILED | — |
| Nov 10, 2017 | DETH | DEATH OF INTERNATIONAL REGISTRATION | — |
| Feb 24, 2017 | INNT | TOTAL INVALIDATION PROCESSED BY THE IB | — |
| Feb 27, 2016 | INTS | TOTAL INVALIDATION OF REG EXT PROTECTION SENT TO IB | — |
| Feb 27, 2016 | INPC | INVALIDATION PROCESSED | — |
| Dec 17, 2015 | INTR | TOTAL INVALIDATION OF REG EXT PROTECTION CREATED | — |
| Apr 17, 2015 | C71T | CANCELLED SECTION 71 | — |
| Apr 14, 2013 | FINO | FINAL DECISION TRANSACTION PROCESSED BY IB | — |
| Feb 1, 2013 | NREP | NEW REPRESENTATIVE AT IB RECEIVED | — |
| Jan 9, 2009 | FICS | FINAL DISPOSITION NOTICE SENT TO IB | — |
| Jan 8, 2009 | FIMP | FINAL DISPOSITION PROCESSED | — |
| Dec 16, 2008 | FICR | FINAL DISPOSITION NOTICE CREATED, TO BE SENT TO IB | — |
| Sep 16, 2008 | R.PR | REGISTERED-PRINCIPAL REGISTER | Your trademark is registered on the Principal Register — the strongest form of federal trademark protection. You may use the ® symbol for the covered goods and services. Maintenance filings (Section 8 and renewals) are required to keep the registration alive. |
| Jul 10, 2008 | CHLD | CHANGE OF OWNER RECEIVED FROM IB | — |
| Jul 1, 2008 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| Jun 11, 2008 | NPUB | NOTICE OF PUBLICATION | — |
| May 28, 2008 | PREV | LAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED | — |
| May 28, 2008 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| May 28, 2008 | XAEC | EXAMINER'S AMENDMENT ENTERED | — |
| May 28, 2008 | GNEN | NOTIFICATION OF EXAMINERS AMENDMENT E-MAILED | — |
| May 28, 2008 | GNEA | EXAMINERS AMENDMENT E-MAILED | — |
| May 28, 2008 | CNEA | EXAMINERS AMENDMENT -WRITTEN | — |
| Apr 28, 2008 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Apr 28, 2008 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Apr 26, 2008 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| Apr 24, 2008 | TROA | TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Apr 24, 2008 | PETG | PETITION TO REVIVE-GRANTED | — |
| Apr 24, 2008 | PROA | TEAS PETITION TO REVIVE RECEIVED | — |
| Apr 1, 2008 | ARAA | ATTORNEY/DOM.REP.REVOKED AND/OR APPOINTED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Apr 1, 2008 | REAP | TEAS REVOKE/APP/CHANGE ADDR OF ATTY/DOM REP RECEIVED | — |
| Mar 7, 2008 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Feb 28, 2008 | MAB2 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - FAILURE TO RESPOND | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Feb 28, 2008 | ABN2 | ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSE | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Aug 23, 2007 | RFNT | REFUSAL PROCESSED BY IB | — |
| Aug 2, 2007 | RFCS | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED - REFUSAL SENT TO IB | — |
| Aug 2, 2007 | RFRR | REFUSAL PROCESSED BY MPU | — |
| Aug 2, 2007 | RFCR | NON-FINAL ACTION (IB REFUSAL) PREPARED FOR REVIEW | — |
| Aug 1, 2007 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Jul 31, 2007 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Jun 29, 2007 | NWAP | NEW APPLICATION ENTERED | — |
| Jun 28, 2007 | REPR | SN ASSIGNED FOR SECT 66A APPL FROM IB | — |