USPTO serial 79038889
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
FIBULA MÜCEVHER SANAYI VE TICARET ANONIM SIRKETI
ISTANBUL, TR
Other trademarks owned by FIBULA MÜCEVHER SANAYI VE TICARET ANONIM SIRKETI
FIBULA MÜCEVHER SANAYI VE TICARET ANONIM SIRKETI
ISTANBUL, TR
Other trademarks owned by FIBULA MÜCEVHER SANAYI VE TICARET ANONIM SIRKETI
EFE KUYUMCULUK; SANAYI VE TICARET LIMITED SIRKETI
TR
Other trademarks owned by EFE KUYUMCULUK; SANAYI VE TICARET LIMITED SIRKETI
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
JOHN S. EGBERT
John S. Egbert Egbert Law Offices, PLLC412 Main Street7th FloorHouston, TX 77002| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 014 | Precious metals and their alloys and goods in precious metals or coated therewith not included in other classes; horological and chronometric instruments; statues in precious metals; imitation jewelry, jewelry of precious metals, precious stones, medallions, bracelets, rings, gold anklets, necktie needles, cuff links, tie pins; decorative household items, namely, vases, plates, cups, silverware, except knives, forks, spoons, cigarette holders, dishes, bowls, tobacco and cigarette cases, ashtrays, towel rails, all made of precious metals | ABANDONED | — |
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Feb 17, 2014 | DETH | DEATH OF INTERNATIONAL REGISTRATION | — |
| Oct 2, 2010 | FINT | FINAL DECISION TRANSACTION PROCESSED BY IB | — |
| Jul 15, 2010 | FICS | FINAL DISPOSITION NOTICE SENT TO IB | — |
| Jul 15, 2010 | FICR | FINAL DISPOSITION NOTICE CREATED, TO BE SENT TO IB | — |
| Jul 15, 2009 | MAB4 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - INTER PARTES DECISION | — |
| Jul 15, 2009 | ABN4 | ABANDONMENT - AFTER INTER PARTES DECISION | — |
| Jul 15, 2009 | OP.T | OPPOSITION TERMINATED NO. 999999 | — |
| Jul 15, 2009 | OP.S | OPPOSITION SUSTAINED NO. 999999 | — |
| Sep 4, 2008 | RFNT | REFUSAL PROCESSED BY IB | — |
| Aug 15, 2008 | OP.I | OPPOSITION INSTITUTED NO. 999999 | — |
| Aug 14, 2008 | OPNS | OPPOSITION NOTICE (IB REFUSAL) SENT TO IB | — |
| Aug 14, 2008 | OPNC | OPPOSITION NOTICE (IB REFUSAL) CREATED | — |
| May 15, 2008 | ETOF | EXTENSION OF TIME TO OPPOSE RECEIVED | — |
| Apr 15, 2008 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| Mar 26, 2008 | NPUB | NOTICE OF PUBLICATION | — |
| Mar 8, 2008 | PREV | LAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED | — |
| Mar 6, 2008 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Feb 29, 2008 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Feb 28, 2008 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Feb 28, 2008 | ERFR | TEAS REQUEST FOR RECONSIDERATION RECEIVED | — |
| Feb 15, 2008 | GNFN | NOTIFICATION OF FINAL REFUSAL EMAILED | — |
| Feb 15, 2008 | GNFR | FINAL REFUSAL E-MAILED | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| Feb 15, 2008 | CNFR | FINAL REFUSAL WRITTEN | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| Feb 14, 2008 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| Jan 25, 2008 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Jan 24, 2008 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Jan 24, 2008 | TROA | TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Jan 24, 2008 | TCCA | TEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED | — |
| Nov 30, 2007 | CHLD | CHANGE OF OWNER RECEIVED FROM IB | — |
| Sep 6, 2007 | RFNT | REFUSAL PROCESSED BY IB | — |
| Aug 17, 2007 | RFCS | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED - REFUSAL SENT TO IB | — |
| Aug 17, 2007 | RFRR | REFUSAL PROCESSED BY MPU | — |
| Aug 17, 2007 | RFCR | NON-FINAL ACTION (IB REFUSAL) PREPARED FOR REVIEW | — |
| Aug 16, 2007 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Aug 16, 2007 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Jun 29, 2007 | NWAP | NEW APPLICATION ENTERED | — |
| Jun 28, 2007 | SDRC | SN ASSIGNED FOR SECT 66A SUBSEQ DESIG FROM IB | — |