USPTO serial 79038931
VADU
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
Reg. 3454022Status 706Registered
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- Jun 24, 2008
- Examiner
- HETZEL, DANNEAN
- Law office
- GENERIC WEB UPDATE
What this means
This trademark is registered with the USPTO. Monitoring new filings can help you catch lookalike marks early.
Need help with VADU?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
Wertheim, DE
DE
DE
DE
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
R. Peter Spies
R. Peter Spies Dineff Trademark Law Limited160 North Wacker DriveChicago, IL 60606UNITED STATESGoods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 006 | [ Common metals and their alloys, unwrought and semi-worked for further manufacture; metal building materials, namely, metal chambers that use vacuum and ultrahigh vacuum equipment; transportable buildings of metal; materials of metal for railway tracks; non-electric cables and wires of common metal; metallic pipes and tubes; metal safes; cobalt, copper and iron ores; metal flanges; metal pipes; manually operated metal valves; metal condensation traps; metal gas locks for vacuum and ultrahigh vacuum installations; metal adsorption traps being components for vacuum and ultrahigh vacuum tanks ] | SECTION 71 - CANCELLED | — |
| 009 | [ Electric measuring apparatus and instruments, namely, water temperature gauges, air fuel/ratio gauges, boost gauges, vacuum gauges and exhaust gas temperature gauges; apparatus for recording, transmission and reproduction of sound and images, blank magnetic data-carriers, blank recording computer discs, data processors and computers, all for use with vacuum and ultrahigh vacuum systems; vacuum and ultrahigh vacuum experimentation apparatus and manipulation systems, namely, vacuum drying ovens, ultrahigh vacuum laminators, ultrahigh vacuum surface analyzing installations, all for laboratory and scientific use; leak testing apparatus and/or systems for vacuum and ultrahigh vacuum installations; leak testing systems for vacuum and ultrahigh vacuum installations; ] electric continuous soldering apparatus [ ; electric smelting furnaces for laboratory experiments; particle accelerators and parts for particle accelerators, in particular beam lines ] | ACTIVE | — |
| 011 | [ high vacuum thermal installations comprised of lighting, heating, steam generating, cooking, refrigerating, drying, ventilating and/or water supply apparatus for functional tests of assemblies or electric components under aerospace conditions, circulating air ovens; high-temperature furnaces; heat exchangers not being parts of machines; industrial ovens used for the heat treatment of metallic goods for others; drying chambers for industrial use ] | SECTION 71 - CANCELLED | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
- Other trademarks owned by PINK GmbH Thermosysteme
- Other trademarks owned by PINK GmbH Vakuumtechnik
- Other trademarks owned by PINK GmbH Vakuumtechnik
- Other trademarks owned by PINK GmbH Vakuumtechnik
- Other trademarks in Class 006
- Other trademarks in Class 009
- Other trademarks in Class 011
- Similar marks named VADU
- Recently changed USPTO trademarks
- Recently filed trademarks
- Browse all trademark records
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Jul 12, 2018 | INNA | INVALIDATION REVIEWED - NO ACTION REQUIRED BY OFFICE | — |
| Jul 6, 2018 | INPR | PARTIAL INVALIDATION OF REG EXT PROTECTION CREATED | — |
| Nov 6, 2017 | NA71 | NOTICE OF ACCEPTANCE OF SEC. 71 - E-MAILED | — |
| Nov 6, 2017 | 71AG | REGISTERED-SEC.71 ACCEPTED | — |
| Nov 1, 2017 | ES71 | TEAS SECTION 71 RECEIVED | — |
| Jun 24, 2017 | REM4 | COURTESY REMINDER - SEC. 71 (10-YR) E-MAILED | — |
| May 4, 2017 | RNWL | INTERNATIONAL REGISTRATION RENEWED | — |
| Aug 18, 2016 | NREP | NEW REPRESENTATIVE AT IB RECEIVED | — |
| Jun 26, 2015 | INNP | PARTIAL INVALIDATION PROCESSED BY THE IB | — |
| Jun 5, 2015 | NREP | NEW REPRESENTATIVE AT IB RECEIVED | — |
| Jun 4, 2015 | INPS | PARTIAL INVALIDATION OF REG EXT PROTECTION SENT TO IB | — |
| Jun 4, 2015 | INPC | INVALIDATION PROCESSED | — |
| Mar 12, 2015 | NREP | NEW REPRESENTATIVE AT IB RECEIVED | — |
| Mar 2, 2014 | INPR | PARTIAL INVALIDATION OF REG EXT PROTECTION CREATED | — |
| Jul 2, 2013 | NA75 | NOTICE OF ACCEPTANCE OF SEC. 71 & 15 - E-MAILED | — |
| Jul 2, 2013 | C75P | REGISTERED - PARTIAL SEC. 71 ACCEPTED & SEC. 15 ACK. | — |
| Jul 2, 2013 | 715F | REGISTERED - SEC. 71 & SEC. 15 FILED | — |
| Jul 2, 2013 | APRE | CASE ASSIGNED TO POST REGISTRATION PARALEGAL | — |
| Jun 24, 2013 | ES75 | TEAS SECTION 71 & 15 RECEIVED | — |
| Dec 30, 2012 | FINO | FINAL DECISION TRANSACTION PROCESSED BY IB | — |
| Apr 15, 2010 | CHLD | CHANGE OF OWNER RECEIVED FROM IB | — |
| Oct 10, 2008 | FICS | FINAL DISPOSITION NOTICE SENT TO IB | — |
| Oct 10, 2008 | FIMP | FINAL DISPOSITION PROCESSED | — |
| Sep 24, 2008 | FICR | FINAL DISPOSITION NOTICE CREATED, TO BE SENT TO IB | — |
| Jun 24, 2008 | R.PR | REGISTERED-PRINCIPAL REGISTER | Your trademark is registered on the Principal Register — the strongest form of federal trademark protection. You may use the ® symbol for the covered goods and services. Maintenance filings (Section 8 and renewals) are required to keep the registration alive. |
| Apr 8, 2008 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| Mar 19, 2008 | NPUB | NOTICE OF PUBLICATION | — |
| Mar 2, 2008 | PREV | LAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED | — |
| Mar 2, 2008 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| Feb 5, 2008 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Feb 5, 2008 | XAEC | EXAMINER'S AMENDMENT ENTERED | — |
| Feb 5, 2008 | GNEN | NOTIFICATION OF EXAMINERS AMENDMENT E-MAILED | — |
| Feb 5, 2008 | GNEA | EXAMINERS AMENDMENT E-MAILED | — |
| Feb 5, 2008 | CNEA | EXAMINERS AMENDMENT -WRITTEN | — |
| Jan 18, 2008 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Jan 18, 2008 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Jan 18, 2008 | ERFR | TEAS REQUEST FOR RECONSIDERATION RECEIVED | — |
| Jan 15, 2008 | GNFN | NOTIFICATION OF FINAL REFUSAL EMAILED | — |
| Jan 15, 2008 | GNFR | FINAL REFUSAL E-MAILED | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| Jan 15, 2008 | CNFR | FINAL REFUSAL WRITTEN | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| Dec 18, 2007 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Dec 18, 2007 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Dec 18, 2007 | ERSI | TEAS RESPONSE TO SUSPENSION INQUIRY RECEIVED | — |
| Oct 18, 2007 | GNS3 | NOTIFICATION OF LETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Oct 18, 2007 | GNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Oct 18, 2007 | CNSL | SUSPENSION LETTER WRITTEN | — |
| Sep 19, 2007 | TCCA | TEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED | — |
| Sep 19, 2007 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Sep 19, 2007 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Sep 19, 2007 | TROA | TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Sep 1, 2007 | RFNT | REFUSAL PROCESSED BY IB | — |
| Aug 13, 2007 | RFCS | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED - REFUSAL SENT TO IB | — |
| Aug 13, 2007 | RFRR | REFUSAL PROCESSED BY MPU | — |
| Aug 13, 2007 | RFCR | NON-FINAL ACTION (IB REFUSAL) PREPARED FOR REVIEW | — |
| Aug 12, 2007 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Jul 29, 2007 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Jul 6, 2007 | NWAP | NEW APPLICATION ENTERED | — |
| Jul 5, 2007 | REPR | SN ASSIGNED FOR SECT 66A APPL FROM IB | — |