Drawing for ASANTECH

USPTO serial 79039042

ASANTECH

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Reg. 3520763Status 707Registered
Filing date
Status date
Registration date
Oct 21, 2008
Examiner
SWIFT, GILBERT M
Law office
—

What this means

This trademark is registered with the USPTO. Monitoring new filings can help you catch lookalike marks early.

Need help with ASANTECH?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Owner

Attorney of record

The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.

Elizabeth A. Cominolli

Elizabeth A. Cominolli Barclay Damon LLP1270 Avenue of the Americas, Suite 600New York, NY 10020UNITED STATES

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
009Video surveillance and monitoring systems used to manage, control and operate network video recorders and systems used for surveillance and monitoring of environments, large vessels and transportation equipment, parking facilities, industrial and other property facilities and industrial equipment, comprised of computer servers, video cameras, interface circuits for video cameras, lights for use on video cameras, [ portable video cameras with built-in videocassette recorders, ] prerecorded magnetic data carriers and recording discs featuring computer software, network video recorder software, video system management and monitoring software and intelligent video analysis softwareACTIVE—
042Research, development, and consultation related thereto in the field of network video recorders used for surveillance and monitoring of environments and of large vessels and transportation equipment, the field of network video surveillance systems for parking facility management, the field of property and industrial access management, and the field of monitoring solutions and platforms for large scale video surveillance environments; design and development of hardware and software used in said fieldsACTIVE—
045[ Security guarding services for the protection of large scale video surveillance environments, large vessels and transportation equipment, parking facilities, industrial and other property facilities ]SECTION 71 - CANCELLED—

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

DateCodeEventWhat it means
Dec 4, 2021NREPNEW REPRESENTATIVE AT IB RECEIVED—
Nov 15, 2019INNPPARTIAL INVALIDATION PROCESSED BY THE IB—
Oct 4, 2019INPSPARTIAL INVALIDATION OF REG EXT PROTECTION SENT TO IB—
Oct 4, 2019INPCINVALIDATION PROCESSED—
Sep 18, 2019INPRPARTIAL INVALIDATION OF REG EXT PROTECTION CREATED—
Jan 18, 2019NA71NOTICE OF ACCEPTANCE OF SEC. 71 - E-MAILED—
Jan 18, 201971.PREGISTERED - PARTIAL SEC 71 ACCEPTED—
Jan 14, 2019EROPTEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION-POST REG RECEIVED—
Nov 23, 2018ADCHCHANGE OF NAME/ADDRESS REC'D FROM IB—
Oct 26, 2018PR71POST REGISTRATION ACTION MAILED - SEC.71—
Oct 22, 201871AFREGISTERED-SEC.71 FILED—
Oct 22, 2018ES71TEAS SECTION 71 RECEIVED—
Oct 21, 2017REM4COURTESY REMINDER - SEC. 71 (10-YR) E-MAILED—
Jun 1, 2017RNWLINTERNATIONAL REGISTRATION RENEWED—
May 12, 2017NREPNEW REPRESENTATIVE AT IB RECEIVED—
May 15, 2015NREPNEW REPRESENTATIVE AT IB RECEIVED—
Oct 29, 2014NA71NOTICE OF ACCEPTANCE OF SEC. 71 - E-MAILED—
Oct 29, 201471AGREGISTERED-SEC.71 ACCEPTED—
Oct 29, 2014APRECASE ASSIGNED TO POST REGISTRATION PARALEGAL—
Oct 21, 2014ES71TEAS SECTION 71 RECEIVED—
Jan 6, 2013FINOFINAL DECISION TRANSACTION PROCESSED BY IB—
Jan 30, 2009FICSFINAL DISPOSITION NOTICE SENT TO IB—
Jan 30, 2009FIMPFINAL DISPOSITION PROCESSED—
Jan 21, 2009FICRFINAL DISPOSITION NOTICE CREATED, TO BE SENT TO IB—
Jan 8, 2009TCCATEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED—
Oct 21, 2008R.PRREGISTERED-PRINCIPAL REGISTERYour trademark is registered on the Principal Register — the strongest form of federal trademark protection. You may use the ® symbol for the covered goods and services. Maintenance filings (Section 8 and renewals) are required to keep the registration alive.
Aug 5, 2008PUBOPUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITIONYour mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance.
Jul 16, 2008NPUBNOTICE OF PUBLICATION—
Jun 30, 2008PREVLAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED—
Jun 27, 2008ALIEASSIGNED TO LIE—
Jun 27, 2008CNSAAPPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER—
Jun 27, 2008XAECEXAMINER'S AMENDMENT ENTERED—
Jun 27, 2008GNENNOTIFICATION OF EXAMINERS AMENDMENT E-MAILED—
Jun 27, 2008GNEAEXAMINERS AMENDMENT E-MAILED—
Jun 27, 2008CNEAEXAMINERS AMENDMENT -WRITTEN—
Jun 26, 2008TEMETEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED—
Jun 26, 2008CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Jun 26, 2008ERFRTEAS REQUEST FOR RECONSIDERATION RECEIVED—
Mar 5, 2008GNFNNOTIFICATION OF FINAL REFUSAL EMAILED—
Mar 5, 2008GNFRFINAL REFUSAL E-MAILEDA final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon.
Mar 5, 2008CNFRFINAL REFUSAL WRITTENA final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon.
Feb 7, 2008TEMETEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED—
Feb 6, 2008CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Feb 6, 2008TROATEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVEDThis event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action.
Feb 6, 2008ARAAATTORNEY/DOM.REP.REVOKED AND/OR APPOINTEDThis event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action.
Feb 6, 2008REAPTEAS REVOKE/APP/CHANGE ADDR OF ATTY/DOM REP RECEIVED—
Feb 6, 2008TCCATEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED—
Aug 23, 2007RFNTREFUSAL PROCESSED BY IB—
Aug 6, 2007RFCSNON-FINAL ACTION MAILED - REFUSAL SENT TO IB—
Aug 6, 2007RFRRREFUSAL PROCESSED BY MPU—
Aug 4, 2007RFCRNON-FINAL ACTION (IB REFUSAL) PREPARED FOR REVIEW—
Aug 3, 2007CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION WRITTENA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Aug 1, 2007DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
Jul 6, 2007NWAPNEW APPLICATION ENTERED—
Jul 5, 2007REPRSN ASSIGNED FOR SECT 66A APPL FROM IB—

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance