USPTO serial 79039045
POLYX
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
Reg. 3472453Status 404
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- Jul 22, 2008
- Examiner
- FATHY, DOMINIC
- Law office
- PUBLICATION AND ISSUE SECTION
What this means
This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.
Need help with POLYX?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Jeffrey H. Kaufman
JEFFREY H. KAUFMAN OBLON SPIVAK MCCLELLAND MAIER & NEUSTADT1940 DUKE STREETALEXANDRIA, VA 22314UNITED STATESGoods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 009 | Entry phones; video intercoms; telephony, namely, telephones; entry phone and video intercom internal and external control units; video monitoring cameras and monitors; household telephones and switchboards; intruder alarm systems and intrusion detection devices thereof, namely, infrared or microwave or combined technology motion detection alarm systems, sirens and video alarms; glass breakage detection alarm systems; door or window opening detectors; thermoregulation devices, namely, ambient thermostats and chronothermostats and control units thereof | SECTION 71 - CANCELLED | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Oct 27, 2017 | DENC | NOTIFICATION OF EFFECT OF CANCELLATION OF INTL REG MAILED | — |
| Oct 27, 2017 | DETH | DEATH OF INTERNATIONAL REGISTRATION | — |
| Jan 8, 2016 | INNT | TOTAL INVALIDATION PROCESSED BY THE IB | — |
| Dec 15, 2015 | INTS | TOTAL INVALIDATION OF REG EXT PROTECTION SENT TO IB | — |
| Dec 15, 2015 | INPC | INVALIDATION PROCESSED | — |
| Oct 27, 2015 | INTR | TOTAL INVALIDATION OF REG EXT PROTECTION CREATED | — |
| Feb 27, 2015 | C71T | CANCELLED SECTION 71 | — |
| May 1, 2014 | ADCH | CHANGE OF NAME/ADDRESS REC'D FROM IB | — |
| Dec 6, 2008 | FINV | FINAL DECISION TRANSACTION PROCESSED BY IB | — |
| Nov 7, 2008 | FICS | FINAL DISPOSITION NOTICE SENT TO IB | — |
| Nov 7, 2008 | FIMP | FINAL DISPOSITION PROCESSED | — |
| Oct 22, 2008 | FICR | FINAL DISPOSITION NOTICE CREATED, TO BE SENT TO IB | — |
| Jul 22, 2008 | R.PR | REGISTERED-PRINCIPAL REGISTER | Your trademark is registered on the Principal Register — the strongest form of federal trademark protection. You may use the ® symbol for the covered goods and services. Maintenance filings (Section 8 and renewals) are required to keep the registration alive. |
| May 6, 2008 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| Apr 16, 2008 | NPUB | NOTICE OF PUBLICATION | — |
| Mar 31, 2008 | PREV | LAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED | — |
| Mar 30, 2008 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| Mar 18, 2008 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Feb 28, 2008 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Feb 28, 2008 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Feb 28, 2008 | ERFR | TEAS REQUEST FOR RECONSIDERATION RECEIVED | — |
| Feb 21, 2008 | GNFN | NOTIFICATION OF FINAL REFUSAL EMAILED | — |
| Feb 21, 2008 | GNFR | FINAL REFUSAL E-MAILED | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| Feb 21, 2008 | CNFR | FINAL REFUSAL WRITTEN | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| Jan 31, 2008 | TCCA | TEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED | — |
| Jan 31, 2008 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Jan 31, 2008 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Jan 31, 2008 | TROA | TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Aug 23, 2007 | RFNT | REFUSAL PROCESSED BY IB | — |
| Aug 2, 2007 | RFCS | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED - REFUSAL SENT TO IB | — |
| Aug 2, 2007 | RFRR | REFUSAL PROCESSED BY MPU | — |
| Aug 2, 2007 | RFCR | NON-FINAL ACTION (IB REFUSAL) PREPARED FOR REVIEW | — |
| Aug 1, 2007 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Jul 20, 2007 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Jul 6, 2007 | NWAP | NEW APPLICATION ENTERED | — |
| Jul 5, 2007 | REPR | SN ASSIGNED FOR SECT 66A APPL FROM IB | — |