Drawing for LITTLE MISS WORLD

USPTO serial 79039090

LITTLE MISS WORLD

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Status 402
Filing date
Status date
Registration date
—
Examiner
CORWIN, KEVIN SCOTT
Law office
TMO LAW OFFICE 112 - EXAMINING ATTORNEY ASSIGNED

What this means

This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.

Need help with LITTLE MISS WORLD?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Owner

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
041Organization of dancing events; organization of fashion shows; arranging of exhibitions for cultural or educational purposes; arranging of contests (education or entertainment); arranging of beauty contests; production of radio and television programs; rental of show scenery; modeling for artists; entertainment in the nature of beauty pageants; photographic reportingSECTION 70 - CANCELLED—

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

DateCodeEventWhat it means
Oct 14, 2017DENANOTIFICATION OF EFFECT OF CANCELLATION OF INTL REG MAILED—
Oct 13, 2017DETHDEATH OF INTERNATIONAL REGISTRATION—
Mar 20, 2009FINTFINAL DECISION TRANSACTION PROCESSED BY IB—
Feb 19, 2009FICSFINAL DISPOSITION NOTICE SENT TO IB—
Feb 19, 2009FICRFINAL DISPOSITION NOTICE CREATED, TO BE SENT TO IB—
Dec 25, 2008OPNXNOTIFICATION OF POSSIBLE OPPOSITION - PROCESSED BY IB—
Dec 11, 2008OPNSNOTIFICATION OF POSSIBLE OPPOSITION SENT TO IB—
Dec 11, 2008OPNRNOTIFICATION OF POSSIBLE OPPOSITION CREATED, TO BE SENT TO IB—
Feb 19, 2008MAB2ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - FAILURE TO RESPONDThe trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time.
Feb 19, 2008ABN2ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSEThe trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time.
Aug 17, 2007RFNTREFUSAL PROCESSED BY IB—
Jul 24, 2007RFCSNON-FINAL ACTION MAILED - REFUSAL SENT TO IB—
Jul 24, 2007RFRRREFUSAL PROCESSED BY MPU—
Jul 22, 2007RFCRNON-FINAL ACTION (IB REFUSAL) PREPARED FOR REVIEW—
Jul 21, 2007CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION WRITTENA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Jul 9, 2007DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
Jul 9, 2007NWAPNEW APPLICATION ENTERED—
Jul 6, 2007LIMSLIMITATION OF GOODS/SERVICES FROM IB ENTERED—
Jul 5, 2007REPRSN ASSIGNED FOR SECT 66A APPL FROM IB—

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance