Drawing for OXIDICE

USPTO serial 79039126

OXIDICE

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Status 402
Filing date
Status date
Registration date
—
Examiner
FRYE, KIMBERLY
Law office
TMO LAW OFFICE 113 - EXAMINING ATTORNEY ASSIGNED

What this means

This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.

Need help with OXIDICE?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Owner

Attorney of record

The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.

Aimee L. Kaplan & Stewart J. Bellus

Aimee L. Kaplan & Stewart J. Bellus Collard & Roe, P.C.1077 Northern Blvd.Roslyn, NY 11576UNITED STATES

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
001Chemical preparations for keeping fresh and preserving foodstuffs; chemical preparations to prevent mildew and downy mildew; textile-impregnating chemicals; vine disease preventing chemicals; chemical preservatives for pharmaceutical preparations; flower preservatives; water purifying chemicalsSECTION 70 - CANCELLED—
003Cleaning preparations for floors, walls, ceilings or furniture; cosmetic preparations for skin care; cosmetic foot care preparations; cosmetics; non-medicated mouth washes and throat washes for care purposes; nail care preparations; care preparations for use on the human bodySECTION 70 - CANCELLED—
005All-purpose disinfectants; fungicides, herbicides; antiparasitic preparations; antiseptics; antiseptic cotton; aseptic cotton; bacterial poisons; biocides; chemical preparations to treat wheat and tree blight (smut); chemical preparations for treating phylloxera; vine disease treating chemicals; chemical preparations for medical purposes; chemical preparations for veterinary purposes; chemical reagents for medical or veterinary purposes; disinfectants for chemical toilets; disinfectants for hygienic purposes; preparations for destroying dry rot fungus; air purifying preparations, namely air disinfectants and preparations for destroying fungus spores; solutions for contact lenses; soil-sterilizing preparations; preparations for the treatment and care of wounds; mouthwashes and throat washes for medical purposes; parasiticides; pesticides; pharmaceutical preparations for skin care; anticryptogamic preparations; contact lens cleaning preparations; sulphur sticks for use as disinfectants; hydrogren peroxide for medical purposes; disinfectants for wounds; vulnerary sponges; chemical preparations for the protection of plants against the infestation with germs, spurs, moss and against viruses as well as the noxious metabolic products and cell parts of microorganisms; disinfectants not to be used for the human body, namely disinfectants for clinical purposes; household purposes and for the use in stables; preparations for destroying vermin and microorganisms in tobacco; preparations for destroying vermin and microorganisms in cereals; preparations for destroying vermin and microorganisms in textiles; preparations for destroying vermin and microorganisms in carpetsSECTION 70 - CANCELLED—

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

DateCodeEventWhat it means
Feb 25, 2017DENANOTIFICATION OF EFFECT OF CANCELLATION OF INTL REG MAILED—
Feb 24, 2017DETHDEATH OF INTERNATIONAL REGISTRATION—
Oct 24, 2009FINTFINAL DECISION TRANSACTION PROCESSED BY IB—
Sep 21, 2009FICSFINAL DISPOSITION NOTICE SENT TO IB—
Sep 19, 2009FICRFINAL DISPOSITION NOTICE CREATED, TO BE SENT TO IB—
Dec 25, 2008OPNXNOTIFICATION OF POSSIBLE OPPOSITION - PROCESSED BY IB—
Dec 11, 2008OPNSNOTIFICATION OF POSSIBLE OPPOSITION SENT TO IB—
Dec 11, 2008OPNRNOTIFICATION OF POSSIBLE OPPOSITION CREATED, TO BE SENT TO IB—
Oct 2, 2008CHLDCHANGE OF OWNER RECEIVED FROM IB—
Sep 19, 2008MAB2ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - FAILURE TO RESPONDThe trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time.
Sep 19, 2008ABN2ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSEThe trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time.
Feb 7, 2008CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Feb 6, 2008CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION WRITTENA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Jan 16, 2008ARAAATTORNEY/DOM.REP.REVOKED AND/OR APPOINTEDThis event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action.
Jan 16, 2008REAPTEAS REVOKE/APP/CHANGE ADDR OF ATTY/DOM REP RECEIVED—
Jan 16, 2008TCCATEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED—
Jan 16, 2008TEMETEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED—
Jan 16, 2008CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Jan 16, 2008TROATEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVEDThis event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action.
Aug 10, 2007RFNTREFUSAL PROCESSED BY IB—
Jul 19, 2007RFCSNON-FINAL ACTION MAILED - REFUSAL SENT TO IB—
Jul 19, 2007RFRRREFUSAL PROCESSED BY MPU—
Jul 19, 2007RFCRNON-FINAL ACTION (IB REFUSAL) PREPARED FOR REVIEW—
Jul 18, 2007CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION WRITTENA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Jul 6, 2007DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
Jul 6, 2007NWAPNEW APPLICATION ENTERED—
Jul 5, 2007REPRSN ASSIGNED FOR SECT 66A APPL FROM IB—

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance