USPTO serial 79039149
J-FLEX G GEICO
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
Status 402
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- MORRIS, KRISTINA KLOIBER
- Law office
- TTAB
What this means
This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.
Need help with J-FLEX G GEICO?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
CINISELLO BALSAMO (MI), IT
IT
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
KATHLEEN A. COSTIGAN
Kathleen A. Costigan HEDMAN & COSTIGAN, P.C.One Rockefeller Plaza, 11th FloorNew York, NY 10020UNITED STATESGoods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 007 | Installations and machines for immersion and spray gun varnishing of cars, objects and manufactured goods in general, namely, automated systems for pickling, painting and application of plastic materials to truck cabs, the bodywork of vehicles and to various types of metallic objects comprising air compressors, metallic containers, pressurized containers for paint, varnish or plastic, spray guns, air brushes, nozzles for power operated spray guns and sprayers, pressure valves and gauges, and high pressure regulators; lifting machines and installations for automatic transport of objects and machines | ABANDONED | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sep 30, 2017 | DENA | NOTIFICATION OF EFFECT OF CANCELLATION OF INTL REG E-MAILED | — |
| Sep 29, 2017 | DETH | DEATH OF INTERNATIONAL REGISTRATION | — |
| Aug 27, 2015 | ADCH | CHANGE OF NAME/ADDRESS REC'D FROM IB | — |
| Jan 19, 2014 | TCCA | TEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED | — |
| Oct 29, 2010 | NREP | NEW REPRESENTATIVE AT IB RECEIVED | — |
| May 30, 2010 | TCCA | TEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED | — |
| Feb 12, 2010 | FINT | FINAL DECISION TRANSACTION PROCESSED BY IB | — |
| Jan 21, 2010 | FICS | FINAL DISPOSITION NOTICE SENT TO IB | — |
| Jan 21, 2010 | FICR | FINAL DISPOSITION NOTICE CREATED, TO BE SENT TO IB | — |
| Jan 21, 2009 | MAB4 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - INTER PARTES DECISION | — |
| Jan 21, 2009 | ABN4 | ABANDONMENT - AFTER INTER PARTES DECISION | — |
| Jan 21, 2009 | OP.T | OPPOSITION TERMINATED NO. 999999 | — |
| Jan 21, 2009 | OP.S | OPPOSITION SUSTAINED NO. 999999 | — |
| Oct 24, 2008 | RFNP | REFUSAL PROCESSED BY IB | — |
| Oct 3, 2008 | OP.I | OPPOSITION INSTITUTED NO. 999999 | — |
| Oct 2, 2008 | OPNS | OPPOSITION NOTICE (IB REFUSAL) SENT TO IB | — |
| Oct 2, 2008 | OPNC | OPPOSITION NOTICE (IB REFUSAL) CREATED | — |
| Oct 1, 2008 | OPPF | OPPOSITION PAPERS RECEIVED AT TTAB | — |
| Sep 30, 2008 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| Sep 10, 2008 | NPUB | NOTICE OF PUBLICATION | — |
| Aug 28, 2008 | PREV | LAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED | — |
| Aug 23, 2008 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Aug 22, 2008 | CNEA | EXAMINERS AMENDMENT MAILED | — |
| Aug 22, 2008 | XAEC | EXAMINER'S AMENDMENT ENTERED | — |
| Aug 22, 2008 | CNEA | EXAMINERS AMENDMENT -WRITTEN | — |
| Jul 28, 2008 | ACEC | AMENDMENT FROM APPLICANT ENTERED | — |
| Jul 28, 2008 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Jul 20, 2008 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| Jul 14, 2008 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Mar 11, 2008 | CNFR | FINAL REFUSAL MAILED | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| Mar 11, 2008 | CNFR | FINAL REFUSAL WRITTEN | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| Feb 17, 2008 | ACEC | AMENDMENT FROM APPLICANT ENTERED | — |
| Feb 17, 2008 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Feb 17, 2008 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| Jan 16, 2008 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Aug 3, 2007 | RFNT | REFUSAL PROCESSED BY IB | — |
| Jul 16, 2007 | RFCS | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED - REFUSAL SENT TO IB | — |
| Jul 16, 2007 | RFRR | REFUSAL PROCESSED BY MPU | — |
| Jul 14, 2007 | RFCR | NON-FINAL ACTION (IB REFUSAL) PREPARED FOR REVIEW | — |
| Jul 13, 2007 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Jul 6, 2007 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Jul 6, 2007 | NWAP | NEW APPLICATION ENTERED | — |
| Jul 5, 2007 | REPR | SN ASSIGNED FOR SECT 66A APPL FROM IB | — |