Drawing for OJO

USPTO serial 79039196

OJO

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Status 402
Filing date
Status date
Registration date
—
Examiner
FRYE, KIMBERLY
Law office
TMO LAW OFFICE 113 - EXAMINING ATTORNEY ASSIGNED

What this means

This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.

Need help with OJO?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Owner

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
009Spectacles, spectacle frames; optical apparatus and instruments, namely, frames, glasses, lenses, lens sights, readers, reflectorsSECTION 70 - CANCELLED—

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

DateCodeEventWhat it means
May 4, 2013DETHDEATH OF INTERNATIONAL REGISTRATION—
Nov 13, 2009FINTFINAL DECISION TRANSACTION PROCESSED BY IB—
Oct 14, 2009FICSFINAL DISPOSITION NOTICE SENT TO IB—
Oct 14, 2009FICRFINAL DISPOSITION NOTICE CREATED, TO BE SENT TO IB—
Dec 25, 2008OPNXNOTIFICATION OF POSSIBLE OPPOSITION - PROCESSED BY IB—
Dec 11, 2008OPNSNOTIFICATION OF POSSIBLE OPPOSITION SENT TO IB—
Dec 11, 2008OPNRNOTIFICATION OF POSSIBLE OPPOSITION CREATED, TO BE SENT TO IB—
Oct 17, 2008CHLDCHANGE OF OWNER RECEIVED FROM IB—
Oct 14, 2008MAB2ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - FAILURE TO RESPONDThe trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time.
Oct 14, 2008ABN2ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSEThe trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time.
Mar 6, 2008CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Mar 6, 2008CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION WRITTENA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Feb 14, 2008ACECAMENDMENT FROM APPLICANT ENTERED—
Feb 14, 2008CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Feb 14, 2008ALIEASSIGNED TO LIE—
Feb 1, 2008NREPNEW REPRESENTATIVE AT IB RECEIVED—
Jan 11, 2008MAILPAPER RECEIVED—
Jan 7, 2008FAXXFAX RECEIVED—
Aug 2, 2007RFNTREFUSAL PROCESSED BY IB—
Jul 16, 2007RFCSNON-FINAL ACTION MAILED - REFUSAL SENT TO IB—
Jul 16, 2007RFRRREFUSAL PROCESSED BY MPU—
Jul 14, 2007RFCRNON-FINAL ACTION (IB REFUSAL) PREPARED FOR REVIEW—
Jul 13, 2007CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION WRITTENA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Jul 6, 2007DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
Jul 6, 2007NWAPNEW APPLICATION ENTERED—
Jul 5, 2007SDRCSN ASSIGNED FOR SECT 66A SUBSEQ DESIG FROM IB—

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance