USPTO serial 79039201
INCOREZ
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
Reg. 3537208Status 706Registered
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- Nov 25, 2008
- Examiner
- SAUNDERS, ANDREA DAWN
- Law office
- GENERIC WEB UPDATE
What this means
This trademark is registered with the USPTO. Monitoring new filings can help you catch lookalike marks early.
Need help with INCOREZ?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
Baar, CH
CH
Lancashire PR1 4AJ, GB
Lancashire PR1 4AJ, GB
GB
GB
CH
Goods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 001 | Epoxy, polyurethane and acrylic resins; chemical additives for use in the manufacture of paints; polymers, resins, and chemicals used as additives in the manufacture of coatings to enhance water repellency; synthetic polymer thermoset resins used in the manufacture of paints, resins, adhesives and components thereof and dispersions of plastics; polymers and resins used in the manufacture of coatings, paints and adhesives, all included in this class, but not including any such goods being binding agents, binding materials, moulding compounds or tackifiers | ACTIVE | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
- Other trademarks owned by Sika AG
- Other trademarks owned by Sika Technology AG
- Other trademarks owned by Industrial Copolymers Limited
- Other trademarks owned by Industrial Copolymers Limited
- Other trademarks owned by Industrial Copolymers Limited
- Other trademarks owned by INCOREZ LIMITED
- Other trademarks owned by Sika Technology AG
- Other trademarks in Class 001
- Similar marks named INCOREZ
- Recently changed USPTO trademarks
- Recently filed trademarks
- Browse all trademark records
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sep 22, 2023 | RNWL | INTERNATIONAL REGISTRATION RENEWED | — |
| Mar 16, 2020 | CHLD | CHANGE OF OWNER RECEIVED FROM IB | — |
| Jan 10, 2019 | NA71 | NOTICE OF ACCEPTANCE OF SEC. 71 - E-MAILED | — |
| Jan 10, 2019 | 71AG | REGISTERED-SEC.71 ACCEPTED | — |
| Jan 9, 2019 | APRE | CASE ASSIGNED TO POST REGISTRATION PARALEGAL | — |
| Nov 21, 2018 | ES71 | TEAS SECTION 71 RECEIVED | — |
| Nov 25, 2017 | REM4 | COURTESY REMINDER - SEC. 71 (10-YR) E-MAILED | — |
| Mar 31, 2015 | NA71 | NOTICE OF ACCEPTANCE OF SEC. 71 - E-MAILED | — |
| Mar 31, 2015 | NA15 | SEC. 15 ACKNOWLEDGEMENT - E-MAILED | — |
| Mar 31, 2015 | 15AK | REGISTERED - SEC. 15 ACKNOWLEDGED | — |
| Mar 31, 2015 | 71AG | REGISTERED-SEC.71 ACCEPTED | — |
| Mar 27, 2015 | EROP | TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION-POST REG RECEIVED | — |
| Dec 10, 2014 | PR71 | POST REGISTRATION ACTION MAILED - SEC.71 | — |
| Dec 10, 2014 | PR15 | POST REGISTRATION ACTION MAILED - SEC. 15 | — |
| Nov 26, 2014 | APRE | CASE ASSIGNED TO POST REGISTRATION PARALEGAL | — |
| Nov 25, 2014 | E15R | TEAS SECTION 15 RECEIVED | — |
| Nov 24, 2014 | ES71 | TEAS SECTION 71 RECEIVED | — |
| Dec 12, 2013 | RNWL | INTERNATIONAL REGISTRATION RENEWED | — |
| Jan 5, 2013 | FINO | FINAL DECISION TRANSACTION PROCESSED BY IB | — |
| Dec 3, 2010 | ARAA | ATTORNEY/DOM.REP.REVOKED AND/OR APPOINTED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Dec 3, 2010 | REAP | TEAS REVOKE/APP/CHANGE ADDR OF ATTY/DOM REP RECEIVED | — |
| Oct 1, 2010 | CHLD | CHANGE OF OWNER RECEIVED FROM IB | — |
| Sep 17, 2010 | CHLD | CHANGE OF OWNER RECEIVED FROM IB | — |
| May 14, 2009 | CHLD | CHANGE OF OWNER RECEIVED FROM IB | — |
| May 14, 2009 | ADCH | CHANGE OF NAME/ADDRESS REC'D FROM IB | — |
| Mar 16, 2009 | FICS | FINAL DISPOSITION NOTICE SENT TO IB | — |
| Mar 16, 2009 | FIMP | FINAL DISPOSITION PROCESSED | — |
| Feb 25, 2009 | FICR | FINAL DISPOSITION NOTICE CREATED, TO BE SENT TO IB | — |
| Nov 25, 2008 | R.PR | REGISTERED-PRINCIPAL REGISTER | Your trademark is registered on the Principal Register — the strongest form of federal trademark protection. You may use the ® symbol for the covered goods and services. Maintenance filings (Section 8 and renewals) are required to keep the registration alive. |
| Oct 17, 2008 | ETOP | EXTENSION OF TIME TO OPPOSE PROCESS - TERMINATED | — |
| Jul 21, 2008 | CHPB | POST PUBLICATION AMENDMENT - ENTERED | — |
| Jul 16, 2008 | APET | ASSIGNED TO PETITION STAFF | — |
| Jul 7, 2008 | FAXX | FAX RECEIVED | — |
| Jun 27, 2008 | ETOF | EXTENSION OF TIME TO OPPOSE RECEIVED | — |
| Jun 3, 2008 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| May 14, 2008 | NPUB | NOTICE OF PUBLICATION | — |
| Apr 28, 2008 | PREV | LAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED | — |
| Apr 27, 2008 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Mar 26, 2008 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Mar 26, 2008 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Mar 26, 2008 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| Mar 17, 2008 | TROA | TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Mar 17, 2008 | PETG | PETITION TO REVIVE-GRANTED | — |
| Mar 17, 2008 | PROA | TEAS PETITION TO REVIVE RECEIVED | — |
| Feb 27, 2008 | MAB2 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - FAILURE TO RESPOND | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Feb 27, 2008 | ABN2 | ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSE | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Aug 31, 2007 | RFNT | REFUSAL PROCESSED BY IB | — |
| Aug 1, 2007 | RFCS | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED - REFUSAL SENT TO IB | — |
| Aug 1, 2007 | RFRR | REFUSAL PROCESSED BY MPU | — |
| Aug 1, 2007 | RFCR | NON-FINAL ACTION (IB REFUSAL) PREPARED FOR REVIEW | — |
| Jul 31, 2007 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Jul 31, 2007 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Jul 6, 2007 | NWAP | NEW APPLICATION ENTERED | — |
| Jul 5, 2007 | SDRC | SN ASSIGNED FOR SECT 66A SUBSEQ DESIG FROM IB | — |