Drawing for TECHLAM

USPTO serial 79039226

TECHLAM

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Reg. 3423196Status 404
Filing date
Status date
Registration date
May 6, 2008
Examiner
STEIN, JAMES W
Law office
PUBLICATION AND ISSUE SECTION

What this means

This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.

Need help with TECHLAM?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Owner

Attorney of record

The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.

Sean S. Swidler

Sean S. Swidler IpHorgan Ltd.1130 Lake Cook Rd.Suite 240Buffalo Grove, IL 60089

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
019Non-metallic building materials, namely, non-metallic rigid pipes for building; asphalt; pitch; bitumen asphalt; non-metallic transportable buildings; monuments made of stone; marble; and stonesSECTION 71 - CANCELLED—
027Carpets, rugs, mats and matting, linoleum for covering existing floors; non-textile wall hangingsSECTION 71 - CANCELLED—
037Building construction, repair, and installation servicesSECTION 71 - CANCELLED—

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

DateCodeEventWhat it means
Nov 27, 2017DENCNOTIFICATION OF EFFECT OF CANCELLATION OF INTL REG MAILED—
Nov 27, 2017DETHDEATH OF INTERNATIONAL REGISTRATION—
May 19, 2017NREPNEW REPRESENTATIVE AT IB RECEIVED—
May 4, 2017NREPNEW REPRESENTATIVE AT IB RECEIVED—
Sep 24, 2015INNTTOTAL INVALIDATION PROCESSED BY THE IB—
Sep 3, 2015INTSTOTAL INVALIDATION OF REG EXT PROTECTION SENT TO IB—
Sep 3, 2015INPCINVALIDATION PROCESSED—
Aug 12, 2015INTRTOTAL INVALIDATION OF REG EXT PROTECTION CREATED—
Dec 12, 2014C71TCANCELLED SECTION 71—
Apr 20, 2013FINOFINAL DECISION TRANSACTION PROCESSED BY IB—
Apr 19, 2013NREPNEW REPRESENTATIVE AT IB RECEIVED—
Aug 26, 2008FICSFINAL DISPOSITION NOTICE SENT TO IB—
Aug 26, 2008FIMPFINAL DISPOSITION PROCESSED—
Aug 7, 2008FICRFINAL DISPOSITION NOTICE CREATED, TO BE SENT TO IB—
May 6, 2008R.PRREGISTERED-PRINCIPAL REGISTERYour trademark is registered on the Principal Register — the strongest form of federal trademark protection. You may use the ® symbol for the covered goods and services. Maintenance filings (Section 8 and renewals) are required to keep the registration alive.
Feb 19, 2008PUBOPUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITIONYour mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance.
Jan 30, 2008NPUBNOTICE OF PUBLICATION—
Jan 15, 2008PREVLAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED—
Jan 15, 2008ALIEASSIGNED TO LIE—
Dec 1, 2007CNSAAPPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER—
Nov 30, 2007TEMETEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED—
Nov 30, 2007CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Nov 30, 2007TROATEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVEDThis event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action.
Nov 29, 2007ARAAATTORNEY/DOM.REP.REVOKED AND/OR APPOINTEDThis event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action.
Nov 29, 2007REAPTEAS REVOKE/APP/CHANGE ADDR OF ATTY/DOM REP RECEIVED—
Sep 14, 2007RFNTREFUSAL PROCESSED BY IB—
Aug 24, 2007RFCSNON-FINAL ACTION MAILED - REFUSAL SENT TO IB—
Aug 24, 2007RFRRREFUSAL PROCESSED BY MPU—
Aug 24, 2007RFCRNON-FINAL ACTION (IB REFUSAL) PREPARED FOR REVIEW—
Aug 23, 2007CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION WRITTENA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Aug 18, 2007DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
Jul 13, 2007NWAPNEW APPLICATION ENTERED—
Jul 12, 2007REPRSN ASSIGNED FOR SECT 66A APPL FROM IB—

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance