Drawing for LINDA MCCARTNEY GOOD FOOD, GOOD TASTE

USPTO serial 79039245

LINDA MCCARTNEY GOOD FOOD, GOOD TASTE

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Reg. 3567832Status 404
Filing date
Status date
Registration date
Jan 27, 2009
Examiner
BLANE, SUZANNE
Law office
—

What this means

This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.

Need help with LINDA MCCARTNEY GOOD FOOD, GOOD TASTE?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Owner

Attorney of record

The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.

Donna J. Bunton

Donna J.Bunton Nixon & Vanderhye P.C.901 North Glebe Road11th FloorArlington, VA 22203

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
029Prepared vegetarian foods being chilled or frozen, namely, entrees and side dishes consisting of vegetables with or without cheese; food preparations made from vegetable matter, namely, processed foods consisting of meat substitutes, vegetarian sausages, vegetarian quarter poundersSECTION 71 - CANCELLED—
030Preparations made from cereals, namely, pizza; pies, namely, pies containing vegetarian mince and creamy vegetable pies; pasta, prepared foods comprising pasta, namely, lasagna, macaroni and cheese, spicy peanut pasta, butternut squash ravioli; frozen entrees and side dishes consisting of pasta or rice with or without vegetables and with or without cheese; prepared foods comprising rice, namely, [chili con carne, or] vegetarian chili * non * [ con ] carneSECTION 71 - CANCELLED—

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

DateCodeEventWhat it means
Oct 13, 2017DENCNOTIFICATION OF EFFECT OF CANCELLATION OF INTL REG E-MAILED—
Oct 13, 2017DETHDEATH OF INTERNATIONAL REGISTRATION—
Apr 7, 2017INNTTOTAL INVALIDATION PROCESSED BY THE IB—
May 18, 2016INTSTOTAL INVALIDATION OF REG EXT PROTECTION SENT TO IB—
May 18, 2016INPCINVALIDATION PROCESSED—
Apr 28, 2016INTRTOTAL INVALIDATION OF REG EXT PROTECTION CREATED—
Aug 28, 2015C71TCANCELLED SECTION 71—
Feb 21, 2014INNPPARTIAL INVALIDATION PROCESSED BY THE IB—
Jun 13, 2013INNAINVALIDATION REVIEWED - NO ACTION REQUIRED BY OFFICE—
Jan 6, 2013FINOFINAL DECISION TRANSACTION PROCESSED BY IB—
Mar 16, 2012INPRPARTIAL INVALIDATION OF REG EXT PROTECTION CREATED—
Aug 8, 2011INPSPARTIAL INVALIDATION OF REG EXT PROTECTION SENT TO IB—
Aug 8, 2011INPCINVALIDATION PROCESSED—
Jun 16, 2011COC.CORRECTION UNDER SECTION 7 - PROCESSED—
Mar 24, 2011INPRPARTIAL INVALIDATION OF REG EXT PROTECTION CREATED—
Feb 9, 2011APRECASE ASSIGNED TO POST REGISTRATION PARALEGAL—
Feb 8, 2011PARITEAS VOLUNTARY AMENDMENT RECEIVED—
Feb 8, 2011ES7RTEAS SECTION 7 REQUEST RECEIVED—
Feb 4, 2011ARAAATTORNEY/DOM.REP.REVOKED AND/OR APPOINTEDThis event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action.
Feb 4, 2011REAPTEAS REVOKE/APP/CHANGE ADDR OF ATTY/DOM REP RECEIVED—
Jan 28, 2010A7OKAMENDMENT UNDER SECTION 7 - PROCESSED—
Jan 28, 2010APRECASE ASSIGNED TO POST REGISTRATION PARALEGAL—
Jan 20, 2010ES7RTEAS SECTION 7 REQUEST RECEIVED—
May 28, 2009COC.CORRECTION UNDER SECTION 7 - PROCESSED—
May 19, 2009PLGLASSIGNED TO PARALEGAL—
May 8, 2009TCCATEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED—
May 8, 2009ES7RTEAS SECTION 7 REQUEST RECEIVED—
May 8, 2009FICSFINAL DISPOSITION NOTICE SENT TO IB—
May 8, 2009FIMPFINAL DISPOSITION PROCESSED—
Apr 27, 2009FICRFINAL DISPOSITION NOTICE CREATED, TO BE SENT TO IB—
Jan 27, 2009R.PRREGISTERED-PRINCIPAL REGISTERYour trademark is registered on the Principal Register — the strongest form of federal trademark protection. You may use the ® symbol for the covered goods and services. Maintenance filings (Section 8 and renewals) are required to keep the registration alive.
Jan 7, 2009OPNXNOTIFICATION OF POSSIBLE OPPOSITION - PROCESSED BY IB—
Dec 18, 2008OPNSNOTIFICATION OF POSSIBLE OPPOSITION SENT TO IB—
Dec 18, 2008OPNRNOTIFICATION OF POSSIBLE OPPOSITION CREATED, TO BE SENT TO IB—
Nov 11, 2008PUBOPUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITIONYour mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance.
Oct 22, 2008NPUBNOTICE OF PUBLICATION—
Oct 6, 2008PREVLAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED—
Sep 29, 2008CNSAAPPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER—
Sep 22, 2008TCCATEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED—
Sep 22, 2008TEMETEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED—
Sep 22, 2008CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Sep 22, 2008TROATEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVEDThis event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action.
Apr 1, 2008CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Mar 31, 2008CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION WRITTENA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Feb 29, 2008ACECAMENDMENT FROM APPLICANT ENTERED—
Feb 29, 2008CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Feb 28, 2008ALIEASSIGNED TO LIE—
Jan 28, 2008MAILPAPER RECEIVED—
Aug 17, 2007RFNTREFUSAL PROCESSED BY IB—
Jul 30, 2007RFCSNON-FINAL ACTION MAILED - REFUSAL SENT TO IB—
Jul 30, 2007RFRRREFUSAL PROCESSED BY MPU—
Jul 28, 2007RFCRNON-FINAL ACTION (IB REFUSAL) PREPARED FOR REVIEW—
Jul 27, 2007CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION WRITTENA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Jul 13, 2007DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
Jul 13, 2007NWAPNEW APPLICATION ENTERED—
Jul 12, 2007REPRSN ASSIGNED FOR SECT 66A APPL FROM IB—

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance