USPTO serial 79039264
CLARINOX
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
Reg. 3449743Status 706Registered
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- Jun 17, 2008
- Examiner
- POVARCHUK, REBECCA JOYCE
- Law office
- GENERIC WEB UPDATE
What this means
This trademark is registered with the USPTO. Monitoring new filings can help you catch lookalike marks early.
Need help with CLARINOX?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Harris A. Wolin
Harris A. Wolin Myers Wolin, LLC100 South Jefferson Road, Suite 202Whippany, NJ 07981-1009United StatesGoods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 009 | Computer software to allow users to develop computer software and wireless devices; computer hardware; computer firmware for electronic and wireless electronic devices to facilitate function of protocols, drivers, development environment and tools on multiple processor and operating systems software configurations; communication and telecommunication apparatus and instruments for facilitating the development of embedded software and wireless devices, namely, devices for wireless radio transmission; electronic apparatus and instruments for facilitating the development of embedded software and wireless devices, namely, computer hardware; data processing equipment for facilitating the development of embedded software and wireless devices, namely, data processors, central processing units and wireless modules comprised of computer hardware, amplifiers for wireless communications, devices for wireless radio transmission; computer peripherals; downloadable electronic publications, namely, reference manuals, user guides, sample applications and training materials in the field of embedded systems and wireless communication protocols; wireless application software for wireless content delivery, wireless graphic delivery, wireless speech delivery, wireless data delivery, wireless text delivery, wireless music delivery, and wireless video delivery | ACTIVE | — |
| 042 | Design and development of computer hardware, firmware and software; computer programming; maintenance, installation and updating of computer software, hardware and firmware; computer system design; design of networks and telecommunication installations, wireless networks and global communication networks; information, advisory and consultancy services in relation to all the aforesaid mentioned services including providing these services online | ACTIVE | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
- Other trademarks owned by Clarinox Technologies Pty Ltd
- Other trademarks owned by Clarinox Technologies Pty Ltd
- Other trademarks owned by Clarinox Technologies Pty Ltd
- Other trademarks in Class 009
- Other trademarks in Class 042
- Similar marks named CLARINOX
- Recently changed USPTO trademarks
- Recently filed trademarks
- Browse all trademark records
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Aug 16, 2024 | NREP | NEW REPRESENTATIVE AT IB RECEIVED | — |
| Aug 10, 2024 | NREP | NEW REPRESENTATIVE AT IB RECEIVED | — |
| Jan 26, 2024 | TCCA | TEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED | — |
| Jan 26, 2024 | ARAA | ATTORNEY/DOM.REP.REVOKED AND/OR APPOINTED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Jan 26, 2024 | REAP | TEAS REVOKE/APP/CHANGE ADDR OF ATTY/DOM REP RECEIVED | — |
| Sep 15, 2023 | NREP | NEW REPRESENTATIVE AT IB RECEIVED | — |
| Jun 9, 2022 | CHAN | APPLICANT/CORRESPONDENCE CHANGES (NON-RESPONSIVE) ENTERED | — |
| Jun 9, 2022 | TCCA | TEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED | — |
| Jun 9, 2022 | ECDR | TEAS CHANGE OF DOMESTIC REPRESENTATIVES ADDRESS | — |
| Jun 9, 2022 | ARAA | ATTORNEY/DOM.REP.REVOKED AND/OR APPOINTED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Jun 9, 2022 | REAP | TEAS REVOKE/APP/CHANGE ADDR OF ATTY/DOM REP RECEIVED | — |
| Jun 9, 2022 | COAR | TEAS CHANGE OF OWNER ADDRESS RECEIVED | — |
| Jun 26, 2018 | NA71 | NOTICE OF ACCEPTANCE OF SEC. 71 - E-MAILED | — |
| Jun 26, 2018 | 71AG | REGISTERED-SEC.71 ACCEPTED | — |
| Jun 25, 2018 | APRE | CASE ASSIGNED TO POST REGISTRATION PARALEGAL | — |
| Jun 5, 2018 | ES71 | TEAS SECTION 71 RECEIVED | — |
| Jun 5, 2018 | TCCA | TEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED | — |
| Jul 13, 2017 | RNWL | INTERNATIONAL REGISTRATION RENEWED | — |
| Jun 17, 2017 | REM4 | COURTESY REMINDER - SEC. 71 (10-YR) E-MAILED | — |
| Jul 10, 2013 | NA71 | NOTICE OF ACCEPTANCE OF SEC. 71 - E-MAILED | — |
| Jul 10, 2013 | 71AG | REGISTERED-SEC.71 ACCEPTED | — |
| Jul 8, 2013 | APRE | CASE ASSIGNED TO POST REGISTRATION PARALEGAL | — |
| Jun 30, 2013 | ES71 | TEAS SECTION 71 RECEIVED | — |
| Jun 30, 2013 | TCCA | TEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED | — |
| Dec 30, 2012 | FINO | FINAL DECISION TRANSACTION PROCESSED BY IB | — |
| May 7, 2012 | TCCA | TEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED | — |
| Oct 6, 2008 | FICS | FINAL DISPOSITION NOTICE SENT TO IB | — |
| Oct 6, 2008 | FIMP | FINAL DISPOSITION PROCESSED | — |
| Sep 17, 2008 | FICR | FINAL DISPOSITION NOTICE CREATED, TO BE SENT TO IB | — |
| Jun 17, 2008 | R.PR | REGISTERED-PRINCIPAL REGISTER | Your trademark is registered on the Principal Register — the strongest form of federal trademark protection. You may use the ® symbol for the covered goods and services. Maintenance filings (Section 8 and renewals) are required to keep the registration alive. |
| Apr 1, 2008 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| Mar 12, 2008 | NPUB | NOTICE OF PUBLICATION | — |
| Feb 25, 2008 | PREV | LAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED | — |
| Feb 25, 2008 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| Jan 24, 2008 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Jan 16, 2008 | XAEC | EXAMINER'S AMENDMENT ENTERED | — |
| Jan 16, 2008 | GNEN | NOTIFICATION OF EXAMINERS AMENDMENT E-MAILED | — |
| Jan 16, 2008 | GNEA | EXAMINERS AMENDMENT E-MAILED | — |
| Jan 16, 2008 | CNEA | EXAMINERS AMENDMENT -WRITTEN | — |
| Jan 14, 2008 | TCCA | TEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED | — |
| Nov 16, 2007 | CNFR | FINAL REFUSAL MAILED | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| Nov 15, 2007 | CNFR | FINAL REFUSAL WRITTEN | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| Oct 26, 2007 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Oct 26, 2007 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Oct 26, 2007 | TROA | TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Aug 17, 2007 | RFNP | REFUSAL PROCESSED BY IB | — |
| Jul 30, 2007 | RFCS | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED - REFUSAL SENT TO IB | — |
| Jul 30, 2007 | RFRR | REFUSAL PROCESSED BY MPU | — |
| Jul 27, 2007 | RFCR | NON-FINAL ACTION (IB REFUSAL) PREPARED FOR REVIEW | — |
| Jul 26, 2007 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Jul 13, 2007 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Jul 13, 2007 | NWAP | NEW APPLICATION ENTERED | — |
| Jul 12, 2007 | REPR | SN ASSIGNED FOR SECT 66A APPL FROM IB | — |