Drawing for NEXT LIMIT TECHNOLOGIES

USPTO serial 79039275

NEXT LIMIT TECHNOLOGIES

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Reg. 3580603Status 404
Filing date
Status date
Registration date
Feb 24, 2009
Examiner
BELL, MARLENE D
Law office
GENERIC WEB UPDATE

What this means

This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.

Need help with NEXT LIMIT TECHNOLOGIES?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Owner

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
009COMPUTER PROGRAMS AND SOFTWARE RECORDED ON MAGNETIC MEDIA OR DOWNLOADED FROM A REMOTE COMPUTER NETWORK FEATURING 3D ANIMATION AND SIMULATION OF PHYSICAL PROCESSES MODELING FLUID FLOW, MOVEMENT OF PHYSICAL OBJECTS, THERMAL PROCESSES AND LIGHT PROPAGATIONSECTION 70 - CANCELLED—
042INDUSTRIAL ANALYSIS AND RESEARCH SERVICES IN THE FIELD OF COMPUTER TECHNOLOGY AND SIMULATION; COMPUTER HARDWARE AND SOFTWARE DESIGN AND DEVELOPMENTSECTION 70 - CANCELLED—

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

DateCodeEventWhat it means
Nov 10, 2017DENCNOTIFICATION OF EFFECT OF CANCELLATION OF INTL REG MAILED—
Nov 10, 2017DETHDEATH OF INTERNATIONAL REGISTRATION—
Nov 18, 2016WOAGWITHDRAWAL OF ATTORNEY GRANTED—
Nov 18, 2016WOARTEAS WITHDRAWAL OF ATTORNEY RECEIVED—
Aug 14, 2015NREPNEW REPRESENTATIVE AT IB RECEIVED—
Feb 27, 2015NA71NOTICE OF ACCEPTANCE OF SEC. 71 - E-MAILED—
Feb 27, 201571AGREGISTERED-SEC.71 ACCEPTED—
Feb 26, 2015EROPTEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION-POST REG RECEIVED—
Feb 26, 2015PR71POST REGISTRATION ACTION MAILED - SEC.71—
Feb 26, 2015APRECASE ASSIGNED TO POST REGISTRATION PARALEGAL—
Feb 24, 201571AFREGISTERED-SEC.71 FILED—
Feb 24, 2015ES71TEAS SECTION 71 RECEIVED—
Apr 20, 2013FINOFINAL DECISION TRANSACTION PROCESSED BY IB—
Jun 2, 2009FICSFINAL DISPOSITION NOTICE SENT TO IB—
Jun 2, 2009FIMPFINAL DISPOSITION PROCESSED—
May 24, 2009FICRFINAL DISPOSITION NOTICE CREATED, TO BE SENT TO IB—
Feb 24, 2009R.PRREGISTERED-PRINCIPAL REGISTERYour trademark is registered on the Principal Register — the strongest form of federal trademark protection. You may use the ® symbol for the covered goods and services. Maintenance filings (Section 8 and renewals) are required to keep the registration alive.
Jan 7, 2009OPNXNOTIFICATION OF POSSIBLE OPPOSITION - PROCESSED BY IB—
Dec 18, 2008OPNSNOTIFICATION OF POSSIBLE OPPOSITION SENT TO IB—
Dec 18, 2008OPNRNOTIFICATION OF POSSIBLE OPPOSITION CREATED, TO BE SENT TO IB—
Dec 9, 2008PUBOPUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITIONYour mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance.
Nov 19, 2008NPUBNOTICE OF PUBLICATION—
Nov 5, 2008PREVLAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED—
Nov 5, 2008ALIEASSIGNED TO LIE—
Oct 29, 2008CNSAAPPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER—
Oct 13, 2008TEMETEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED—
Oct 13, 2008CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Oct 13, 2008ERFRTEAS REQUEST FOR RECONSIDERATION RECEIVED—
May 2, 2008CNFRFINAL REFUSAL MAILEDA final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon.
May 1, 2008CNFRFINAL REFUSAL WRITTENA final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon.
Feb 7, 2008TEMETEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED—
Feb 7, 2008CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Feb 7, 2008TROATEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVEDThis event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action.
Feb 6, 2008TCCATEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED—
Sep 1, 2007RFNTREFUSAL PROCESSED BY IB—
Aug 9, 2007RFCSNON-FINAL ACTION MAILED - REFUSAL SENT TO IB—
Aug 9, 2007RFRRREFUSAL PROCESSED BY MPU—
Aug 9, 2007RFCRNON-FINAL ACTION (IB REFUSAL) PREPARED FOR REVIEW—
Aug 8, 2007CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION WRITTENA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Aug 4, 2007DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
Jul 13, 2007NWAPNEW APPLICATION ENTERED—
Jul 12, 2007REPRSN ASSIGNED FOR SECT 66A APPL FROM IB—

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance