Drawing for MECHINI

USPTO serial 79039320

MECHINI

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Reg. 3524334Status 709
Filing date
Status date
Registration date
Oct 28, 2008
Examiner
GAYNOR, BARBARA ANNE
Law office
GENERIC WEB UPDATE

What this means

This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.

Need help with MECHINI?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Owner

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
011Lighting fixtures, standard lamps, table lamps, chandeliers, ceiling lamps, electric candle lamps and electric candelabrasSECTION 71 - CANCELLED—
020Furniture, mirrors, picture framesSECTION 71 - CANCELLED—
021Unworked or semi-worked glass except glass used in building; ornaments and sculptures of glass, porcelain and earthenwareSECTION 71 - CANCELLED—

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

DateCodeEventWhat it means
Jan 9, 2022INNTTOTAL INVALIDATION PROCESSED BY THE IB—
Nov 30, 2021INTSTOTAL INVALIDATION OF REG EXT PROTECTION SENT TO IB—
Nov 30, 2021INPCINVALIDATION PROCESSED—
Oct 26, 2021INTRTOTAL INVALIDATION OF REG EXT PROTECTION CREATED—
Feb 26, 2021C71TCANCELLED SECTION 71—
Oct 28, 2017REM4COURTESY REMINDER - SEC. 71 (10-YR) E-MAILED—
Jun 29, 2017RNWLINTERNATIONAL REGISTRATION RENEWED—
Feb 19, 2016ADCHCHANGE OF NAME/ADDRESS REC'D FROM IB—
May 13, 2015NA75NOTICE OF ACCEPTANCE OF SEC. 71 & 15 - E-MAILED—
May 13, 2015C75AREGISTERED - SEC. 71 ACCEPTED & SEC. 15 ACK.—
May 13, 2015APRECASE ASSIGNED TO POST REGISTRATION PARALEGAL—
Apr 28, 2015ES75TEAS SECTION 71 & 15 RECEIVED—
Apr 28, 2015TCCATEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED—
Jan 6, 2013FINOFINAL DECISION TRANSACTION PROCESSED BY IB—
Apr 28, 2009WOAGWITHDRAWAL OF ATTORNEY GRANTED—
Apr 28, 2009WOARTEAS WITHDRAWAL OF ATTORNEY RECEIVED—
Feb 6, 2009FICSFINAL DISPOSITION NOTICE SENT TO IB—
Feb 6, 2009FIMPFINAL DISPOSITION PROCESSED—
Jan 28, 2009FICRFINAL DISPOSITION NOTICE CREATED, TO BE SENT TO IB—
Oct 28, 2008R.PRREGISTERED-PRINCIPAL REGISTERYour trademark is registered on the Principal Register — the strongest form of federal trademark protection. You may use the ® symbol for the covered goods and services. Maintenance filings (Section 8 and renewals) are required to keep the registration alive.
Aug 12, 2008PUBOPUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITIONYour mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance.
Jul 23, 2008NPUBNOTICE OF PUBLICATION—
Jul 9, 2008PREVLAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED—
Jul 8, 2008CNSAAPPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER—
Jun 18, 2008TEMETEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED—
Jun 18, 2008CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Jun 18, 2008TROATEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVEDThis event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action.
Jun 11, 2008TCCATEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED—
May 30, 2008NAUDNOTICE OF UNRESPONSIVE AMENDMENT - MAILED—
May 29, 2008NAUDREPORT UNRESPONSIVE AMENDMENT - COMPLETED—
May 5, 2008TEMETEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED—
May 5, 2008CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
May 5, 2008ALIEASSIGNED TO LIE—
May 1, 2008TROATEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVEDThis event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action.
May 1, 2008PETGPETITION TO REVIVE-GRANTED—
May 1, 2008PROATEAS PETITION TO REVIVE RECEIVED—
Mar 3, 2008MAB2ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - FAILURE TO RESPONDThe trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time.
Mar 1, 2008ABN2ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSEThe trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time.
Aug 10, 2007RFNTREFUSAL PROCESSED BY IB—
Jul 23, 2007RFCSNON-FINAL ACTION MAILED - REFUSAL SENT TO IB—
Jul 23, 2007RFRRREFUSAL PROCESSED BY MPU—
Jul 21, 2007RFCRNON-FINAL ACTION (IB REFUSAL) PREPARED FOR REVIEW—
Jul 20, 2007CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION WRITTENA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Jul 20, 2007DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
Jul 13, 2007NWAPNEW APPLICATION ENTERED—
Jul 12, 2007REPRSN ASSIGNED FOR SECT 66A APPL FROM IB—

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance