USPTO serial 79039325
SEL HOSES
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
Reg. 3554283Status 709
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- Dec 30, 2008
- Examiner
- ROSSMAN, WILLIAM M
- Law office
- GENERIC WEB UPDATE
What this means
This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.
Need help with SEL HOSES?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
TEKNIK KAUCUK; SANAYI ANONIM SIRKETI
Karakoy, ISTANBUL, TR
Other trademarks owned by TEKNIK KAUCUK; SANAYI ANONIM SIRKETI
TEKNIK KAUCUK; SANAYI ANONIM SIRKETI
Karakoy, ISTANBUL, TR
Other trademarks owned by TEKNIK KAUCUK; SANAYI ANONIM SIRKETI
TEKNIK KAUCUK; SANAYI ANONIM SIRKETI
Karakoy, ISTANBUL, TR
Other trademarks owned by TEKNIK KAUCUK; SANAYI ANONIM SIRKETI
POLIMER KAUCUK SANAYI VE PAZARLAMA A.S.
Istanbul, TR
Other trademarks owned by POLIMER KAUCUK SANAYI VE PAZARLAMA A.S.
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Anthony D. Logan
ANTHONY D. LOGAN Venjuris, PC1938 E. OSBORN RD.PHOENIX, AZ 85016UNITED STATESGoods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 017 | Flexible tubes and hoses made from elastic, plastic or rubber and textile, namely, fire hoses; connecting hose for vehicle radiators; and reinforcement hoses, namely, watering hoses, air hoses, hoses for use with steam, non-metal fuel oil hoses, non-metal, plastic and rubber hoses for use with abrasive liquids industrial applications non-metal hoses for use with nutrient containing liquids for agricultural use, non-metal hoses for use in the chemical industry, non-metal hoses for off-shore commercial marine use and oil industry use, hydraulic hoses made of rubber and non-metal, non-metallic hoses for PVC plumbing | SECTION 71 - CANCELLED | — |
| 035 | The bringing together, for the benefit of others, a variety of goods (excluding the transport thereof), enabling customers to conveniently view and purchase those goods, namely, tubes and hoses made from elastic, plastic or rubber, textile, namely, fire hoses, hose for vehicle radiators, reinforcement hoses, namely, water hoses, air hoses, steam hoses, fuel oil hoses, hoses for use with abrasive liquids, non-metal hoses for use with nutrient containing liquids for agricultural use, non-metal hoses for use in the chemical industry, non-metal hoses for off-shore commercial marine use and oil industry use, hydraulic hoses, thermoplastic hoses, hoses for PVC plumbing | SECTION 71 - CANCELLED | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
- Other trademarks owned by TEKNIK KAUCUK; SANAYI ANONIM SIRKETI
- Other trademarks owned by TEKNIK KAUCUK; SANAYI ANONIM SIRKETI
- Other trademarks owned by TEKNIK KAUCUK; SANAYI ANONIM SIRKETI
- Other trademarks owned by POLIMER KAUCUK SANAYI VE PAZARLAMA A.S.
- Other trademarks in Class 017
- Other trademarks in Class 035
- Similar marks named SEL HOSES
- Recently changed USPTO trademarks
- Recently filed trademarks
- Browse all trademark records
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Jan 9, 2022 | INNT | TOTAL INVALIDATION PROCESSED BY THE IB | — |
| Nov 30, 2021 | XXSS | GENERIC MADRID TRANSACTION SENT TO IB | — |
| Nov 30, 2021 | XXCR | GENERIC MADRID TRANSACTION CREATED | — |
| Oct 26, 2021 | INTR | TOTAL INVALIDATION OF REG EXT PROTECTION CREATED | — |
| Feb 26, 2021 | C71T | CANCELLED SECTION 71 | — |
| Dec 30, 2017 | REM4 | COURTESY REMINDER - SEC. 71 (10-YR) E-MAILED | — |
| Apr 20, 2017 | RNWL | INTERNATIONAL REGISTRATION RENEWED | — |
| Jan 23, 2015 | NA75 | NOTICE OF ACCEPTANCE OF SEC. 71 & 15 - E-MAILED | — |
| Jan 23, 2015 | C75A | REGISTERED - SEC. 71 ACCEPTED & SEC. 15 ACK. | — |
| Jan 23, 2015 | APRE | CASE ASSIGNED TO POST REGISTRATION PARALEGAL | — |
| Dec 29, 2014 | ES75 | TEAS SECTION 71 & 15 RECEIVED | — |
| Oct 16, 2014 | ADCH | CHANGE OF NAME/ADDRESS REC'D FROM IB | — |
| Jan 6, 2013 | FINO | FINAL DECISION TRANSACTION PROCESSED BY IB | — |
| Jan 7, 2011 | CHLD | CHANGE OF OWNER RECEIVED FROM IB | — |
| Apr 8, 2009 | FICS | FINAL DISPOSITION NOTICE SENT TO IB | — |
| Apr 8, 2009 | FIMP | FINAL DISPOSITION PROCESSED | — |
| Mar 30, 2009 | FICR | FINAL DISPOSITION NOTICE CREATED, TO BE SENT TO IB | — |
| Jan 7, 2009 | OPNX | NOTIFICATION OF POSSIBLE OPPOSITION - PROCESSED BY IB | — |
| Dec 30, 2008 | R.PR | REGISTERED-PRINCIPAL REGISTER | Your trademark is registered on the Principal Register — the strongest form of federal trademark protection. You may use the ® symbol for the covered goods and services. Maintenance filings (Section 8 and renewals) are required to keep the registration alive. |
| Dec 18, 2008 | OPNS | NOTIFICATION OF POSSIBLE OPPOSITION SENT TO IB | — |
| Dec 18, 2008 | OPNR | NOTIFICATION OF POSSIBLE OPPOSITION CREATED, TO BE SENT TO IB | — |
| Oct 14, 2008 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| Sep 24, 2008 | NPUB | NOTICE OF PUBLICATION | — |
| Sep 9, 2008 | PREV | LAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED | — |
| Sep 4, 2008 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Sep 4, 2008 | XAEC | EXAMINER'S AMENDMENT ENTERED | — |
| Sep 4, 2008 | GNEN | NOTIFICATION OF EXAMINERS AMENDMENT E-MAILED | — |
| Sep 4, 2008 | GNEA | EXAMINERS AMENDMENT E-MAILED | — |
| Sep 4, 2008 | CNEA | EXAMINERS AMENDMENT -WRITTEN | — |
| Aug 28, 2008 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Aug 28, 2008 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Aug 28, 2008 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| Aug 20, 2008 | ERFR | TEAS REQUEST FOR RECONSIDERATION RECEIVED | — |
| Aug 20, 2008 | EXPI | EX PARTE APPEAL-INSTITUTED | — |
| Aug 20, 2008 | JURT | JURISDICTION RESTORED TO EXAMINING ATTORNEY | — |
| Aug 20, 2008 | EXAF | EXPARTE APPEAL RECEIVED AT TTAB | — |
| Feb 20, 2008 | GNFN | NOTIFICATION OF FINAL REFUSAL EMAILED | — |
| Feb 20, 2008 | GNFR | FINAL REFUSAL E-MAILED | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| Feb 20, 2008 | CNFR | FINAL REFUSAL WRITTEN | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| Feb 11, 2008 | GNFN | NOTIFICATION OF FINAL REFUSAL EMAILED | — |
| Feb 11, 2008 | GNFR | FINAL REFUSAL E-MAILED | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| Feb 11, 2008 | CNFR | FINAL REFUSAL WRITTEN | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| Jan 25, 2008 | TCCA | TEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED | — |
| Jan 25, 2008 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Jan 25, 2008 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Jan 25, 2008 | TROA | TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Aug 17, 2007 | RFNT | REFUSAL PROCESSED BY IB | — |
| Jul 30, 2007 | RFCS | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED - REFUSAL SENT TO IB | — |
| Jul 30, 2007 | RFRR | REFUSAL PROCESSED BY MPU | — |
| Jul 27, 2007 | RFCR | NON-FINAL ACTION (IB REFUSAL) PREPARED FOR REVIEW | — |
| Jul 26, 2007 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Jul 18, 2007 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Jul 13, 2007 | NWAP | NEW APPLICATION ENTERED | — |
| Jul 12, 2007 | REPR | SN ASSIGNED FOR SECT 66A APPL FROM IB | — |