Drawing for QUALITY FLOORING PRODUCTS

USPTO serial 79039327

QUALITY FLOORING PRODUCTS

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Reg. 3449745Status 404
Filing date
Status date
Registration date
Jun 17, 2008
Examiner
CAPSHAW, DANIEL
Law office
—

What this means

This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.

Need help with QUALITY FLOORING PRODUCTS?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Owner

Attorney of record

The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.

Jennifer Sheehan Anderson

JENNIFER SHEEHAN ANDERSON HONIGMAN MILLER SCHWARTZ AND COHN LLP39400 WOODWARD AVENUE, SUITE 101BLOOMFIELD HILLS, MI 48304-5151UNITED STATES

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
006[Metal building materials, namely, metal flooring, metal floors, metal floor tiles, floor panels of metal and metal expansion joints for floors]SECTION 71 - CANCELLED—
019Non-metallic building materials, namely, non-metal metal flooring, non-metal floors, non-metal floor tiles, non-metal floor panels and non-metal expansion joints for floorsSECTION 70 - CANCELLED—

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

DateCodeEventWhat it means
Dec 8, 2017DENCNOTIFICATION OF EFFECT OF CANCELLATION OF INTL REG E-MAILED—
Dec 8, 2017DETHDEATH OF INTERNATIONAL REGISTRATION—
Jun 17, 2017REM4COURTESY REMINDER - SEC. 71 (10-YR) E-MAILED—
Jun 26, 2015INNPPARTIAL INVALIDATION PROCESSED BY THE IB—
Jun 4, 2015INPSPARTIAL INVALIDATION OF REG EXT PROTECTION SENT TO IB—
Jun 4, 2015INPCINVALIDATION PROCESSED—
Feb 27, 2014INPRPARTIAL INVALIDATION OF REG EXT PROTECTION CREATED—
Jun 27, 2013NA75NOTICE OF ACCEPTANCE OF SEC. 71 & 15 - E-MAILED—
Jun 27, 2013C75PREGISTERED - PARTIAL SEC. 71 ACCEPTED & SEC. 15 ACK.—
Jun 27, 2013715FREGISTERED - SEC. 71 & SEC. 15 FILED—
Jun 27, 2013APRECASE ASSIGNED TO POST REGISTRATION PARALEGAL—
Jun 17, 2013ES75TEAS SECTION 71 & 15 RECEIVED—
Mar 18, 2013NREPNEW REPRESENTATIVE AT IB RECEIVED—
Dec 30, 2012FINOFINAL DECISION TRANSACTION PROCESSED BY IB—
Jul 26, 2011TCCATEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED—
Oct 6, 2008FICSFINAL DISPOSITION NOTICE SENT TO IB—
Oct 6, 2008FIMPFINAL DISPOSITION PROCESSED—
Sep 17, 2008FICRFINAL DISPOSITION NOTICE CREATED, TO BE SENT TO IB—
Jun 17, 2008R.PRREGISTERED-PRINCIPAL REGISTERYour trademark is registered on the Principal Register — the strongest form of federal trademark protection. You may use the ® symbol for the covered goods and services. Maintenance filings (Section 8 and renewals) are required to keep the registration alive.
Apr 1, 2008PUBOPUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITIONYour mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance.
Mar 12, 2008NPUBNOTICE OF PUBLICATION—
Feb 23, 2008PREVLAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED—
Feb 23, 2008ALIEASSIGNED TO LIE—
Jan 23, 2008CNSAAPPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER—
Jan 22, 2008ARAAATTORNEY/DOM.REP.REVOKED AND/OR APPOINTEDThis event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action.
Jan 22, 2008REAPTEAS REVOKE/APP/CHANGE ADDR OF ATTY/DOM REP RECEIVED—
Jan 22, 2008TEMETEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED—
Jan 22, 2008CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Jan 22, 2008TROATEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVEDThis event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action.
Sep 14, 2007RFNTREFUSAL PROCESSED BY IB—
Aug 28, 2007RFCSNON-FINAL ACTION MAILED - REFUSAL SENT TO IB—
Aug 28, 2007RFRRREFUSAL PROCESSED BY MPU—
Aug 28, 2007RFCRNON-FINAL ACTION (IB REFUSAL) PREPARED FOR REVIEW—
Aug 27, 2007CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION WRITTENA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Aug 21, 2007DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
Jul 13, 2007NWAPNEW APPLICATION ENTERED—
Jul 12, 2007REPRSN ASSIGNED FOR SECT 66A APPL FROM IB—

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance