USPTO serial 79039356
TRAYSKIN
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
Reg. 3392181Status 706Registered
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- Mar 4, 2008
- Examiner
- KHOURI, SANI PHILIPPE
- Law office
- GENERIC WEB UPDATE
What this means
This trademark is registered with the USPTO. Monitoring new filings can help you catch lookalike marks early.
Need help with TRAYSKIN?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Stewart J. Bellus
Stewart J. Bellus Collard & Roe, P.C.1077 Northern Blvd.Roslyn, NY 11576UNITED STATESGoods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 006 | Industrial packaging containers of metal, in particular of aluminium | ACTIVE | — |
| 016 | Packaging of cardboard, packaging of paper, namely, packaging paper, paper for wrapping and packaging, plastic materials for packaging, included in this class, namely plastic bubble packs for wrapping or packaging, plastic bags for packaging, plastic foils for packaging | ACTIVE | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Jan 26, 2018 | NA71 | NOTICE OF ACCEPTANCE OF SEC. 71 - E-MAILED | — |
| Jan 26, 2018 | 71AG | REGISTERED-SEC.71 ACCEPTED | — |
| Jan 23, 2018 | ES71 | TEAS SECTION 71 RECEIVED | — |
| Jun 22, 2017 | RNWL | INTERNATIONAL REGISTRATION RENEWED | — |
| Sep 3, 2013 | NA75 | NOTICE OF ACCEPTANCE OF SEC. 71 & 15 - MAILED | — |
| Sep 3, 2013 | C75A | REGISTERED - SEC. 71 ACCEPTED & SEC. 15 ACK. | — |
| Sep 3, 2013 | APRE | CASE ASSIGNED TO POST REGISTRATION PARALEGAL | — |
| Aug 16, 2013 | 715F | REGISTERED - SEC. 71 & SEC. 15 FILED | — |
| Aug 16, 2013 | ES75 | TEAS SECTION 71 & 15 RECEIVED | — |
| Aug 1, 2009 | FINO | FINAL DECISION TRANSACTION PROCESSED BY IB | — |
| Jun 10, 2008 | FICS | FINAL DISPOSITION NOTICE SENT TO IB | — |
| Jun 10, 2008 | FIMP | FINAL DISPOSITION PROCESSED | — |
| Jun 4, 2008 | FICR | FINAL DISPOSITION NOTICE CREATED, TO BE SENT TO IB | — |
| Mar 4, 2008 | R.PR | REGISTERED-PRINCIPAL REGISTER | Your trademark is registered on the Principal Register — the strongest form of federal trademark protection. You may use the ® symbol for the covered goods and services. Maintenance filings (Section 8 and renewals) are required to keep the registration alive. |
| Dec 18, 2007 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| Nov 28, 2007 | NPUB | NOTICE OF PUBLICATION | — |
| Nov 15, 2007 | PREV | LAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED | — |
| Nov 15, 2007 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| Oct 12, 2007 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Oct 11, 2007 | ARAA | ATTORNEY/DOM.REP.REVOKED AND/OR APPOINTED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Oct 11, 2007 | REAP | TEAS REVOKE/APP/CHANGE ADDR OF ATTY/DOM REP RECEIVED | — |
| Oct 11, 2007 | TCCA | TEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED | — |
| Oct 11, 2007 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Oct 11, 2007 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Oct 11, 2007 | TROA | TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Oct 5, 2007 | RFNP | REFUSAL PROCESSED BY IB | — |
| Sep 17, 2007 | RFCS | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED - REFUSAL SENT TO IB | — |
| Sep 17, 2007 | RFRR | REFUSAL PROCESSED BY MPU | — |
| Sep 15, 2007 | RFCR | NON-FINAL ACTION (IB REFUSAL) PREPARED FOR REVIEW | — |
| Sep 14, 2007 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Sep 14, 2007 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Jul 13, 2007 | NWAP | NEW APPLICATION ENTERED | — |
| Jul 12, 2007 | REPR | SN ASSIGNED FOR SECT 66A APPL FROM IB | — |