USPTO serial 79039371
ITALIANS' THE ART OF FOOD
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
Status 402
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- POVARCHUK, REBECCA JOYCE
- Law office
- TMO LAW OFFICE 115 - EXAMINING ATTORNEY ASSIGNED
What this means
This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.
Need help with ITALIANS' THE ART OF FOOD?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
AGUGIARO & FIGNA MOLINI S.P.A.
I-43044 COLLECCHIO (PARMA), IT
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Kathleen A. Costigan
Kathleen A. Costigan HEDMAN & COSTIGAN, P.C.One Rockefeller Plaza, 11th FloorNew York, NY 10020UNITED STATESGoods and services
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sep 30, 2017 | DENA | NOTIFICATION OF EFFECT OF CANCELLATION OF INTL REG E-MAILED | — |
| Sep 29, 2017 | DETH | DEATH OF INTERNATIONAL REGISTRATION | — |
| Jan 19, 2014 | TCCA | TEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED | — |
| May 30, 2010 | TCCA | TEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED | — |
| Feb 5, 2010 | FINT | FINAL DECISION TRANSACTION PROCESSED BY IB | — |
| Jan 12, 2010 | FICS | FINAL DISPOSITION NOTICE SENT TO IB | — |
| Jan 12, 2010 | FICR | FINAL DISPOSITION NOTICE CREATED, TO BE SENT TO IB | — |
| Jan 12, 2009 | MAB2 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - FAILURE TO RESPOND | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Jan 12, 2009 | ABN2 | ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSE | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Jan 7, 2009 | OPNX | NOTIFICATION OF POSSIBLE OPPOSITION - PROCESSED BY IB | — |
| Dec 18, 2008 | OPNS | NOTIFICATION OF POSSIBLE OPPOSITION SENT TO IB | — |
| Dec 18, 2008 | OPNR | NOTIFICATION OF POSSIBLE OPPOSITION CREATED, TO BE SENT TO IB | — |
| Jun 16, 2008 | CPRA | PRIORITY ACTION MAILED | A priority action is a type of Office Action the USPTO treats as time-sensitive. It usually means the examining attorney needs a specific response or amendment quickly — often relating to a foreign priority claim or a formal requirement. Respond within the stated deadline. |
| Jun 13, 2008 | CPRA | PRIORITY ACTION WRITTEN | A priority action is a type of Office Action the USPTO treats as time-sensitive. It usually means the examining attorney needs a specific response or amendment quickly — often relating to a foreign priority claim or a formal requirement. Respond within the stated deadline. |
| Jun 13, 2008 | ZZZX | PREVIOUS ALLOWANCE COUNT WITHDRAWN | — |
| May 9, 2008 | PBCR | WITHDRAWN FROM PUB - OG REVIEW QUERY | — |
| Apr 30, 2008 | PREV | LAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED | — |
| Apr 30, 2008 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Apr 9, 2008 | ACEC | AMENDMENT FROM APPLICANT ENTERED | — |
| Apr 9, 2008 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Apr 7, 2008 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Dec 6, 2007 | CNFR | FINAL REFUSAL MAILED | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| Dec 5, 2007 | CNFR | FINAL REFUSAL WRITTEN | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| Nov 29, 2007 | ACEC | AMENDMENT FROM APPLICANT ENTERED | — |
| Nov 29, 2007 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Nov 29, 2007 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| Oct 22, 2007 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Aug 17, 2007 | RFNT | REFUSAL PROCESSED BY IB | — |
| Jul 25, 2007 | RFCS | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED - REFUSAL SENT TO IB | — |
| Jul 25, 2007 | RFRR | REFUSAL PROCESSED BY MPU | — |
| Jul 25, 2007 | RFCR | NON-FINAL ACTION (IB REFUSAL) PREPARED FOR REVIEW | — |
| Jul 24, 2007 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Jul 13, 2007 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Jul 13, 2007 | NWAP | NEW APPLICATION ENTERED | — |
| Jul 12, 2007 | REPR | SN ASSIGNED FOR SECT 66A APPL FROM IB | — |