Drawing for GENMOT MOTOR GRANK-SAFT ENDÜSTRI

USPTO serial 79039410

GENMOT MOTOR GRANK-SAFT ENDÜSTRI

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Status 402
Filing date
Status date
Registration date
—
Examiner
SHARMA, NAPOLEON
Law office
TMEG LAW OFFICE 107 - EXAMINING ATTORNEY ASSIGNED

What this means

This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.

Need help with GENMOT MOTOR GRANK-SAFT ENDÜSTRI?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Owner

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
007Crank shafts for land vehiclesSECTION 70 - CANCELLED—
012Drive shafts for land vehiclesSECTION 70 - CANCELLED—

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

DateCodeEventWhat it means
Jul 21, 2017DENANOTIFICATION OF EFFECT OF CANCELLATION OF INTL REG MAILED—
Jul 20, 2017DETHDEATH OF INTERNATIONAL REGISTRATION—
Mar 20, 2009FINTFINAL DECISION TRANSACTION PROCESSED BY IB—
Feb 16, 2009FICSFINAL DISPOSITION NOTICE SENT TO IB—
Feb 15, 2009FICRFINAL DISPOSITION NOTICE CREATED, TO BE SENT TO IB—
Jan 7, 2009OPNXNOTIFICATION OF POSSIBLE OPPOSITION - PROCESSED BY IB—
Dec 18, 2008OPNSNOTIFICATION OF POSSIBLE OPPOSITION SENT TO IB—
Dec 18, 2008OPNRNOTIFICATION OF POSSIBLE OPPOSITION CREATED, TO BE SENT TO IB—
Feb 15, 2008MAB2ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - FAILURE TO RESPONDThe trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time.
Feb 15, 2008ABN2ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSEThe trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time.
Aug 3, 2007RFNTREFUSAL PROCESSED BY IB—
Jul 17, 2007RFCSNON-FINAL ACTION MAILED - REFUSAL SENT TO IB—
Jul 17, 2007RFRRREFUSAL PROCESSED BY MPU—
Jul 17, 2007RFCRNON-FINAL ACTION (IB REFUSAL) PREPARED FOR REVIEW—
Jul 16, 2007CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION WRITTENA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Jul 13, 2007DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
Jul 13, 2007NWAPNEW APPLICATION ENTERED—
Jul 12, 2007REPRSN ASSIGNED FOR SECT 66A APPL FROM IB—

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance