Drawing for BI-FLUX TWIN STREAM

USPTO serial 79039416

BI-FLUX TWIN STREAM

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Reg. 3423204Status 404
Filing date
Status date
Registration date
May 6, 2008
Examiner
FRYE, KIMBERLY
Law office
PUBLICATION AND ISSUE SECTION

What this means

This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.

Need help with BI-FLUX TWIN STREAM?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Owner

Attorney of record

The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.

Michael B. Lasky

Michael B. Lasky Altera Law Group220 South Sixth Street1700 US Bank PlazaMinneapolis, MN 55402

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
009Electronic indicators for measuring water filter cartridge life for use with carafesSECTION 71 - CANCELLED—
011Water filters for use with carafes; electric kettles; electric coffee, tea and hot/cold beverage machines; water cooling dispensersSECTION 71 - CANCELLED—
021Household and kitchen containers; water carafes with filtering system for domestic use; non-electric kettles; non-electric coffee machines; water dispensersSECTION 71 - CANCELLED—

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

DateCodeEventWhat it means
Jan 5, 2018UNDNUNDELIVERABLE MAIL - NO ACTION TAKEN—
Dec 15, 2017DENCNOTIFICATION OF EFFECT OF CANCELLATION OF INTL REG MAILED—
Dec 15, 2017DETHDEATH OF INTERNATIONAL REGISTRATION—
Sep 25, 2015INNTTOTAL INVALIDATION PROCESSED BY THE IB—
Sep 3, 2015INTSTOTAL INVALIDATION OF REG EXT PROTECTION SENT TO IB—
Sep 3, 2015INPCINVALIDATION PROCESSED—
Aug 12, 2015INTRTOTAL INVALIDATION OF REG EXT PROTECTION CREATED—
Dec 12, 2014C71TCANCELLED SECTION 71—
Dec 22, 2012FINOFINAL DECISION TRANSACTION PROCESSED BY IB—
Aug 27, 2008FICSFINAL DISPOSITION NOTICE SENT TO IB—
Aug 27, 2008FIMPFINAL DISPOSITION PROCESSED—
Aug 7, 2008FICRFINAL DISPOSITION NOTICE CREATED, TO BE SENT TO IB—
May 6, 2008R.PRREGISTERED-PRINCIPAL REGISTERYour trademark is registered on the Principal Register — the strongest form of federal trademark protection. You may use the ® symbol for the covered goods and services. Maintenance filings (Section 8 and renewals) are required to keep the registration alive.
Feb 28, 2008TCCATEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED—
Feb 19, 2008PUBOPUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITIONYour mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance.
Jan 30, 2008NPUBNOTICE OF PUBLICATION—
Jan 11, 2008PREVLAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED—
Jan 11, 2008ALIEASSIGNED TO LIE—
Nov 27, 2007CNSAAPPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER—
Nov 15, 2007TEMETEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED—
Nov 14, 2007CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Nov 14, 2007TROATEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVEDThis event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action.
Nov 7, 2007ARAAATTORNEY/DOM.REP.REVOKED AND/OR APPOINTEDThis event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action.
Nov 7, 2007REAPTEAS REVOKE/APP/CHANGE ADDR OF ATTY/DOM REP RECEIVED—
Sep 20, 2007RFNPREFUSAL PROCESSED BY IB—
Aug 31, 2007RFCSNON-FINAL ACTION MAILED - REFUSAL SENT TO IB—
Aug 31, 2007RFRRREFUSAL PROCESSED BY MPU—
Aug 31, 2007RFCRNON-FINAL ACTION (IB REFUSAL) PREPARED FOR REVIEW—
Aug 30, 2007CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION WRITTENA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Aug 27, 2007DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
Jul 13, 2007NWAPNEW APPLICATION ENTERED—
Jul 12, 2007REPRSN ASSIGNED FOR SECT 66A APPL FROM IB—

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance