USPTO serial 79039437
GNC CORREAANAYAK
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
Reg. 3392184Status 404
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- Mar 4, 2008
- Examiner
- FOSDICK, GEOFFREY A
- Law office
- PUBLICATION AND ISSUE SECTION
What this means
This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.
Need help with GNC CORREAANAYAK?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Dermot Horgan, Gary H. Saposnik, Jeannine Rittenhouse, Dmitriy Makarov, Sean S. Swidler, Vangelis Economou
Dermot Horgan, Gary H. Saposnik, Jeannine Rittenho IpHorgan Ltd.1130 Lake Cook RoadSuite 240Buffalo Grove, IL 60089Goods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 007 | Milling machines; drilling machines and replacement parts therefor; die-cutting and die-stamping machines; press dies for metal formatting | SECTION 71 - CANCELLED | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sep 8, 2017 | DENC | NOTIFICATION OF EFFECT OF CANCELLATION OF INTL REG MAILED | — |
| Sep 8, 2017 | DETH | DEATH OF INTERNATIONAL REGISTRATION | — |
| Sep 11, 2015 | INNT | TOTAL INVALIDATION PROCESSED BY THE IB | — |
| Aug 13, 2015 | INTS | TOTAL INVALIDATION OF REG EXT PROTECTION SENT TO IB | — |
| Aug 13, 2015 | INPC | INVALIDATION PROCESSED | — |
| Jun 10, 2015 | INTR | TOTAL INVALIDATION OF REG EXT PROTECTION CREATED | — |
| Oct 10, 2014 | C71T | CANCELLED SECTION 71 | — |
| May 8, 2009 | FINO | FINAL DECISION TRANSACTION PROCESSED BY IB | — |
| Jun 10, 2008 | FICS | FINAL DISPOSITION NOTICE SENT TO IB | — |
| Jun 10, 2008 | FIMP | FINAL DISPOSITION PROCESSED | — |
| Jun 4, 2008 | FICR | FINAL DISPOSITION NOTICE CREATED, TO BE SENT TO IB | — |
| Mar 4, 2008 | R.PR | REGISTERED-PRINCIPAL REGISTER | Your trademark is registered on the Principal Register — the strongest form of federal trademark protection. You may use the ® symbol for the covered goods and services. Maintenance filings (Section 8 and renewals) are required to keep the registration alive. |
| Dec 18, 2007 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| Nov 28, 2007 | NPUB | NOTICE OF PUBLICATION | — |
| Nov 10, 2007 | PREV | LAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED | — |
| Nov 10, 2007 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| Oct 9, 2007 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Sep 20, 2007 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Sep 20, 2007 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Sep 20, 2007 | TROA | TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Sep 20, 2007 | ARAA | ATTORNEY/DOM.REP.REVOKED AND/OR APPOINTED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Sep 20, 2007 | REAP | TEAS REVOKE/APP/CHANGE ADDR OF ATTY/DOM REP RECEIVED | — |
| Aug 10, 2007 | RFNT | REFUSAL PROCESSED BY IB | — |
| Jul 20, 2007 | RFCS | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED - REFUSAL SENT TO IB | — |
| Jul 20, 2007 | RFRR | REFUSAL PROCESSED BY MPU | — |
| Jul 20, 2007 | RFCR | NON-FINAL ACTION (IB REFUSAL) PREPARED FOR REVIEW | — |
| Jul 19, 2007 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Jul 17, 2007 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Jul 17, 2007 | NWAP | NEW APPLICATION ENTERED | — |
| Jul 16, 2007 | LIMS | LIMITATION OF GOODS/SERVICES FROM IB ENTERED | — |
| Jul 12, 2007 | REPR | SN ASSIGNED FOR SECT 66A APPL FROM IB | — |