USPTO serial 79039479
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 005 | Pharmaceutical products for veterinary use; sanitary products for medical purposes; dietetic substances adapted for medical use, food for babies; plasters, materials for dressings; material for stopping teeth and dental wax; disinfectants; products for destroying vermin; fungicides, herbicides; medicated bath preparations; sanitary pads, pants or towels; chemical preparations for pharmaceutical products for veterinary use; medicinal herbs; herbal teas; parasiticides; sugar for medical use; alloys of precious metals for dental use | SECTION 70 - CANCELLED | — |
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sep 22, 2017 | DENA | NOTIFICATION OF EFFECT OF CANCELLATION OF INTL REG MAILED | — |
| Sep 21, 2017 | DETH | DEATH OF INTERNATIONAL REGISTRATION | — |
| Mar 26, 2011 | NREP | NEW REPRESENTATIVE AT IB RECEIVED | — |
| Apr 3, 2009 | FINT | FINAL DECISION TRANSACTION PROCESSED BY IB | — |
| Mar 2, 2009 | FICS | FINAL DISPOSITION NOTICE SENT TO IB | — |
| Feb 28, 2009 | FICR | FINAL DISPOSITION NOTICE CREATED, TO BE SENT TO IB | — |
| Jan 7, 2009 | OPNX | NOTIFICATION OF POSSIBLE OPPOSITION - PROCESSED BY IB | — |
| Dec 18, 2008 | OPNS | NOTIFICATION OF POSSIBLE OPPOSITION SENT TO IB | — |
| Dec 18, 2008 | OPNR | NOTIFICATION OF POSSIBLE OPPOSITION CREATED, TO BE SENT TO IB | — |
| Feb 28, 2008 | MAB2 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - FAILURE TO RESPOND | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Feb 28, 2008 | ABN2 | ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSE | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Aug 17, 2007 | RFNT | REFUSAL PROCESSED BY IB | — |
| Jul 31, 2007 | RFCS | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED - REFUSAL SENT TO IB | — |
| Jul 31, 2007 | RFRR | REFUSAL PROCESSED BY MPU | — |
| Jul 31, 2007 | RFCR | NON-FINAL ACTION (IB REFUSAL) PREPARED FOR REVIEW | — |
| Jul 30, 2007 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Jul 16, 2007 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Jul 16, 2007 | NWAP | NEW APPLICATION ENTERED | — |
| Jul 13, 2007 | LIMS | LIMITATION OF GOODS/SERVICES FROM IB ENTERED | — |
| Jul 12, 2007 | REPR | SN ASSIGNED FOR SECT 66A APPL FROM IB | — |