USPTO serial 79039483
BRAND IDEA WHATEVER MAKES THE DIFFERENCE
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- Dec 30, 2008
- Examiner
- POVARCHUK, REBECCA JOYCE
- Law office
- PUBLICATION AND ISSUE SECTION
What this means
This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.
Need help with BRAND IDEA WHATEVER MAKES THE DIFFERENCE?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Owner
BRAND IDEA; di Paolo Maccaferri & C. S.n.c.
IT
Other trademarks owned by BRAND IDEA; di Paolo Maccaferri & C. S.n.c.
BRAND IDEA; di Paolo Maccaferri & C. S.n.c.
IT
Other trademarks owned by BRAND IDEA; di Paolo Maccaferri & C. S.n.c.
BRAND IDEA di Paolo Maccaferri & C. S.n.c.
IT
Other trademarks owned by BRAND IDEA di Paolo Maccaferri & C. S.n.c.
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
JAMES V COSTIGAN
James V. Costigan HEDMAN & COSTIGAN, P.C.1230 Avenue of the Americas, 7th FloorNew York, NY 10020UNITED STATESGoods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 035 | Advertising services and business management consulting; public relations and market research services; assistance to companies in the food sector in the management of their business and commercial functions, namely, business management | SECTION 71 - CANCELLED | — |
| 042 | Research and development services in the food sector; technical analysis and research work in the field of food products; design and development of computers and computer programs; legal advice and assistance activity | SECTION 71 - CANCELLED | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
- Other trademarks owned by BRAND IDEA; di Paolo Maccaferri & C. S.n.c.
- Other trademarks owned by BRAND IDEA; di Paolo Maccaferri & C. S.n.c.
- Other trademarks owned by BRAND IDEA di Paolo Maccaferri & C. S.n.c.
- Other trademarks in Class 035
- Other trademarks in Class 042
- Similar marks named BRAND IDEA WHATEVER MAKES THE DIFFERENCE
- Recently changed USPTO trademarks
- Recently filed trademarks
- Browse all trademark records
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Nov 3, 2017 | UNDN | UNDELIVERABLE MAIL - NO ACTION TAKEN | — |
| Oct 13, 2017 | DENC | NOTIFICATION OF EFFECT OF CANCELLATION OF INTL REG MAILED | — |
| Oct 13, 2017 | DETH | DEATH OF INTERNATIONAL REGISTRATION | — |
| Mar 17, 2017 | INNT | TOTAL INVALIDATION PROCESSED BY THE IB | — |
| Sep 8, 2016 | ADCH | CHANGE OF NAME/ADDRESS REC'D FROM IB | — |
| May 3, 2016 | XXSS | GENERIC MADRID TRANSACTION SENT TO IB | — |
| May 3, 2016 | XXCR | GENERIC MADRID TRANSACTION CREATED | — |
| Mar 31, 2016 | INTR | TOTAL INVALIDATION OF REG EXT PROTECTION CREATED | — |
| Jul 31, 2015 | C71T | CANCELLED SECTION 71 | — |
| Jul 16, 2015 | NREP | NEW REPRESENTATIVE AT IB RECEIVED | — |
| Apr 14, 2013 | FINO | FINAL DECISION TRANSACTION PROCESSED BY IB | — |
| May 31, 2010 | TCCA | TEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED | — |
| Apr 8, 2009 | FICS | FINAL DISPOSITION NOTICE SENT TO IB | — |
| Apr 8, 2009 | FIMP | FINAL DISPOSITION PROCESSED | — |
| Mar 30, 2009 | FICR | FINAL DISPOSITION NOTICE CREATED, TO BE SENT TO IB | — |
| Jan 7, 2009 | OPNX | NOTIFICATION OF POSSIBLE OPPOSITION - PROCESSED BY IB | — |
| Dec 30, 2008 | R.PR | REGISTERED-PRINCIPAL REGISTER | Your trademark is registered on the Principal Register — the strongest form of federal trademark protection. You may use the ® symbol for the covered goods and services. Maintenance filings (Section 8 and renewals) are required to keep the registration alive. |
| Dec 18, 2008 | OPNS | NOTIFICATION OF POSSIBLE OPPOSITION SENT TO IB | — |
| Dec 18, 2008 | OPNR | NOTIFICATION OF POSSIBLE OPPOSITION CREATED, TO BE SENT TO IB | — |
| Oct 14, 2008 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| Sep 24, 2008 | NPUB | NOTICE OF PUBLICATION | — |
| Sep 9, 2008 | PREV | LAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED | — |
| Sep 8, 2008 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Aug 21, 2008 | ACEC | AMENDMENT FROM APPLICANT ENTERED | — |
| Aug 21, 2008 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Aug 18, 2008 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Aug 8, 2008 | CNCF | CONTINUATION OF FINAL REFUSAL MAILED | — |
| Aug 7, 2008 | CNCF | ACTION CONTINUING A FINAL - COMPLETED | — |
| Jul 12, 2008 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Jul 11, 2008 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Jul 11, 2008 | ERFR | TEAS REQUEST FOR RECONSIDERATION RECEIVED | — |
| Apr 1, 2008 | CNFR | FINAL REFUSAL MAILED | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| Mar 31, 2008 | CNFR | FINAL REFUSAL WRITTEN | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| Feb 28, 2008 | ACEC | AMENDMENT FROM APPLICANT ENTERED | — |
| Feb 28, 2008 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Feb 28, 2008 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| Jan 25, 2008 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Aug 10, 2007 | RFNT | REFUSAL PROCESSED BY IB | — |
| Aug 10, 2007 | RFNT | REFUSAL PROCESSED BY IB | — |
| Jul 20, 2007 | RFCS | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED - REFUSAL SENT TO IB | — |
| Jul 20, 2007 | RFRR | REFUSAL PROCESSED BY MPU | — |
| Jul 20, 2007 | RFCR | NON-FINAL ACTION (IB REFUSAL) PREPARED FOR REVIEW | — |
| Jul 19, 2007 | RFCS | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED - REFUSAL SENT TO IB | — |
| Jul 19, 2007 | RFRR | REFUSAL PROCESSED BY MPU | — |
| Jul 19, 2007 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Jul 19, 2007 | RFCR | NON-FINAL ACTION (IB REFUSAL) PREPARED FOR REVIEW | — |
| Jul 18, 2007 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Jul 13, 2007 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Jul 13, 2007 | NWAP | NEW APPLICATION ENTERED | — |
| Jul 12, 2007 | REPR | SN ASSIGNED FOR SECT 66A APPL FROM IB | — |