Drawing for BRAND IDEA WHATEVER MAKES THE DIFFERENCE

USPTO serial 79039483

BRAND IDEA WHATEVER MAKES THE DIFFERENCE

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Reg. 3554285Status 404
Filing date
Status date
Registration date
Dec 30, 2008
Examiner
POVARCHUK, REBECCA JOYCE
Law office
PUBLICATION AND ISSUE SECTION

What this means

This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.

Need help with BRAND IDEA WHATEVER MAKES THE DIFFERENCE?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Owner

Attorney of record

The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.

JAMES V COSTIGAN

James V. Costigan HEDMAN & COSTIGAN, P.C.1230 Avenue of the Americas, 7th FloorNew York, NY 10020UNITED STATES

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
035Advertising services and business management consulting; public relations and market research services; assistance to companies in the food sector in the management of their business and commercial functions, namely, business managementSECTION 71 - CANCELLED—
042Research and development services in the food sector; technical analysis and research work in the field of food products; design and development of computers and computer programs; legal advice and assistance activitySECTION 71 - CANCELLED—

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

DateCodeEventWhat it means
Nov 3, 2017UNDNUNDELIVERABLE MAIL - NO ACTION TAKEN—
Oct 13, 2017DENCNOTIFICATION OF EFFECT OF CANCELLATION OF INTL REG MAILED—
Oct 13, 2017DETHDEATH OF INTERNATIONAL REGISTRATION—
Mar 17, 2017INNTTOTAL INVALIDATION PROCESSED BY THE IB—
Sep 8, 2016ADCHCHANGE OF NAME/ADDRESS REC'D FROM IB—
May 3, 2016XXSSGENERIC MADRID TRANSACTION SENT TO IB—
May 3, 2016XXCRGENERIC MADRID TRANSACTION CREATED—
Mar 31, 2016INTRTOTAL INVALIDATION OF REG EXT PROTECTION CREATED—
Jul 31, 2015C71TCANCELLED SECTION 71—
Jul 16, 2015NREPNEW REPRESENTATIVE AT IB RECEIVED—
Apr 14, 2013FINOFINAL DECISION TRANSACTION PROCESSED BY IB—
May 31, 2010TCCATEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED—
Apr 8, 2009FICSFINAL DISPOSITION NOTICE SENT TO IB—
Apr 8, 2009FIMPFINAL DISPOSITION PROCESSED—
Mar 30, 2009FICRFINAL DISPOSITION NOTICE CREATED, TO BE SENT TO IB—
Jan 7, 2009OPNXNOTIFICATION OF POSSIBLE OPPOSITION - PROCESSED BY IB—
Dec 30, 2008R.PRREGISTERED-PRINCIPAL REGISTERYour trademark is registered on the Principal Register — the strongest form of federal trademark protection. You may use the ® symbol for the covered goods and services. Maintenance filings (Section 8 and renewals) are required to keep the registration alive.
Dec 18, 2008OPNSNOTIFICATION OF POSSIBLE OPPOSITION SENT TO IB—
Dec 18, 2008OPNRNOTIFICATION OF POSSIBLE OPPOSITION CREATED, TO BE SENT TO IB—
Oct 14, 2008PUBOPUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITIONYour mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance.
Sep 24, 2008NPUBNOTICE OF PUBLICATION—
Sep 9, 2008PREVLAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED—
Sep 8, 2008CNSAAPPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER—
Aug 21, 2008ACECAMENDMENT FROM APPLICANT ENTERED—
Aug 21, 2008CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Aug 18, 2008MAILPAPER RECEIVED—
Aug 8, 2008CNCFCONTINUATION OF FINAL REFUSAL MAILED—
Aug 7, 2008CNCFACTION CONTINUING A FINAL - COMPLETED—
Jul 12, 2008TEMETEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED—
Jul 11, 2008CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Jul 11, 2008ERFRTEAS REQUEST FOR RECONSIDERATION RECEIVED—
Apr 1, 2008CNFRFINAL REFUSAL MAILEDA final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon.
Mar 31, 2008CNFRFINAL REFUSAL WRITTENA final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon.
Feb 28, 2008ACECAMENDMENT FROM APPLICANT ENTERED—
Feb 28, 2008CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Feb 28, 2008ALIEASSIGNED TO LIE—
Jan 25, 2008MAILPAPER RECEIVED—
Aug 10, 2007RFNTREFUSAL PROCESSED BY IB—
Aug 10, 2007RFNTREFUSAL PROCESSED BY IB—
Jul 20, 2007RFCSNON-FINAL ACTION MAILED - REFUSAL SENT TO IB—
Jul 20, 2007RFRRREFUSAL PROCESSED BY MPU—
Jul 20, 2007RFCRNON-FINAL ACTION (IB REFUSAL) PREPARED FOR REVIEW—
Jul 19, 2007RFCSNON-FINAL ACTION MAILED - REFUSAL SENT TO IB—
Jul 19, 2007RFRRREFUSAL PROCESSED BY MPU—
Jul 19, 2007CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION WRITTENA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Jul 19, 2007RFCRNON-FINAL ACTION (IB REFUSAL) PREPARED FOR REVIEW—
Jul 18, 2007CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION WRITTENA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Jul 13, 2007DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
Jul 13, 2007NWAPNEW APPLICATION ENTERED—
Jul 12, 2007REPRSN ASSIGNED FOR SECT 66A APPL FROM IB—

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance