USPTO serial 79039496
VITO
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
Status 402
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- BROWNE, DAYNA
- Law office
- TMEG LAW OFFICE 104 - SENIOR ATTORNEY
What this means
This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.
Need help with VITO?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
Goods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 009 | Electrical controlling devices; electric transformers; electric accumulators; instruments and apparatus for controlling electric current, namely, electrical controllers for magnetic bearing control; electricity conduits; adapter plugs; adapters of electricity; converters for electric plugs; electrical plug device enabling connection and disconnection of power and/or control cables; electric plugs; plug connectors; electric sockets; moveable sockets; electric switches; ethernet switches; power switches; automatic switchboards; electric light switches; switch boxes; telecommunication switches; electric switch plates; computer network hubs, switches and routers; electrical elevator parts, namely, pushbuttons, signal fixtures and emergency lighting; battery chargers; electric relays; electric fuse boxes; fuses for electric current; fuse clips and panel-mounted fuse holders for use with electronic glass and ceramic fuses; electric junction boxes; junction sleeves for electric cables; electrical circuit boards; circuit breakers; connectors for electronic circuits; voltage regulators; electric wires and cables; electrical resistance heating wires and electrical controllers therefor; resistance measuring instruments | SECTION 70 - CANCELLED | — |
| 011 | Electric lighting fixtures; infrared lighting fixtures; electric torches for lighting; electric track lighting units; fiber optic lighting fixtures used in conjunction with electrical illuminators; lighting tubes; lighting tracks; landscape lighting installations; lighting devices for showcases; outdoor lighting, namely, paver lights, lighters primarily for lighting grills, fireplaces and candles; solar light fixtures, namely, indoor and outdoor solar powered lighting units and fixtures; lighting fixtures for use in parking decks and garages; lighting fixtures that integrate natural daylight and fluorescent lighting into the fixture; table lamps; floor lamps; street lamps; lamps for outdoor use; fluorescent lamps; incandescent lamps and their fittings; lamp bases; lamp reflectors; overhead lamps; lamp chimneys; infrared lamps; lamp whose light can be turned in all directions; vehicle dynamo lamps; filaments for electric lamps; arc lamps; discharge lamps and their fittings; lamp shades | SECTION 70 - CANCELLED | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
- Other trademarks owned by IRENA ELEKTRIK DIS TICARET; KOLLEKTIF SIRKETI AHMET HANPOLAT; VE ORTAGI
- Other trademarks owned by RAINAS ELEKTRIK VE AYDINLATMA MALZEMELERI IMALAT VE SANAYI TICARET LIMITED SIRKETI
- Other trademarks in Class 009
- Other trademarks in Class 011
- Similar marks named VITO
- Recently changed USPTO trademarks
- Recently filed trademarks
- Browse all trademark records
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Dec 31, 2016 | DENA | NOTIFICATION OF EFFECT OF CANCELLATION OF INTL REG MAILED | — |
| Dec 30, 2016 | DETH | DEATH OF INTERNATIONAL REGISTRATION | — |
| Jun 30, 2016 | NREP | NEW REPRESENTATIVE AT IB RECEIVED | — |
| Nov 6, 2014 | CHLD | CHANGE OF OWNER RECEIVED FROM IB | — |
| Feb 5, 2010 | FINT | FINAL DECISION TRANSACTION PROCESSED BY IB | — |
| Jan 12, 2010 | FICS | FINAL DISPOSITION NOTICE SENT TO IB | — |
| Jan 12, 2010 | FICR | FINAL DISPOSITION NOTICE CREATED, TO BE SENT TO IB | — |
| Jan 12, 2009 | MAB2 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - FAILURE TO RESPOND | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Jan 12, 2009 | ABN2 | ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSE | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Jan 7, 2009 | OPNX | NOTIFICATION OF POSSIBLE OPPOSITION - PROCESSED BY IB | — |
| Dec 18, 2008 | OPNS | NOTIFICATION OF POSSIBLE OPPOSITION SENT TO IB | — |
| Dec 18, 2008 | OPNR | NOTIFICATION OF POSSIBLE OPPOSITION CREATED, TO BE SENT TO IB | — |
| Aug 18, 2008 | LIMN | LIMITATION FROM THE IB EXAMINED, NO ACTION IS NEEDED | — |
| Jul 24, 2008 | LIMG | LIMITATION OF GOODS RECEIVED FROM IB | — |
| Jul 18, 2008 | RFNT | REFUSAL PROCESSED BY IB | — |
| Jun 10, 2008 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Jun 9, 2008 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| May 7, 2008 | DMCC | DATA MODIFICATION COMPLETED | — |
| May 6, 2008 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| May 6, 2008 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Apr 24, 2008 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| Apr 21, 2008 | TROA | TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Apr 21, 2008 | PETG | PETITION TO REVIVE-GRANTED | — |
| Apr 21, 2008 | PROA | TEAS PETITION TO REVIVE RECEIVED | — |
| Mar 6, 2008 | MAB2 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - FAILURE TO RESPOND | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Mar 6, 2008 | ABN2 | ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSE | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Sep 1, 2007 | RFNT | REFUSAL PROCESSED BY IB | — |
| Aug 9, 2007 | RFCS | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED - REFUSAL SENT TO IB | — |
| Aug 9, 2007 | RFRR | REFUSAL PROCESSED BY MPU | — |
| Aug 9, 2007 | RFCR | NON-FINAL ACTION (IB REFUSAL) PREPARED FOR REVIEW | — |
| Aug 8, 2007 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Aug 1, 2007 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Jul 16, 2007 | NWAP | NEW APPLICATION ENTERED | — |
| Jul 13, 2007 | LIMS | LIMITATION OF GOODS/SERVICES FROM IB ENTERED | — |
| Jul 12, 2007 | SDRC | SN ASSIGNED FOR SECT 66A SUBSEQ DESIG FROM IB | — |