USPTO serial 79039509
RHINOBULK
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
Reg. 3692642Status 404
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- Oct 6, 2009
- Examiner
- STEIN, JAMES W
- Law office
- PUBLICATION AND ISSUE SECTION
What this means
This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.
Need help with RHINOBULK?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
Trans Ocean Distribution Limited
Southampton, Hampshire SO30 2UH, GB
Trans Ocean Distribution Limited
Southampton, Hampshire SO30 2UH, GB
Trans Ocean Distribution Limited
Southampton, Hampshire SO30 2UH, GB
TRANS OCEAN BULK LOGISTICS LIMITED
GB
Other trademarks owned by TRANS OCEAN BULK LOGISTICS LIMITED
Goods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 020 | Non-metal flexible containers for transporting bulk liquid, granulated materials and powders | SECTION 71 - CANCELLED | — |
| 039 | Transportation, namely, storage transportation and delivery of bulk liquid, granulated materials and powders, raw materials and other freight for others by air, rail, ship or truck; freight transportation by truck, train, air or ship; warehousing services, namely, shipping of bulk liquid, granulated materials and powders, raw materials and other freight for others; distribution services, namely, delivery of bulk liquid, granulated materials and powders, raw materials and other freight for others; logistics services, namely, storage, transportation and delivery of bulk liquids, granulated materials and powders, raw materials and other freight for others by air, rail, ship or truck; storage services, namely, storage of bulk liquid, granulated materials and powders, raw materials and other goods; packaging articles and materials for transportation; haulage, namely, truck hauling; warehousing services | SECTION 71 - CANCELLED | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
- Other trademarks owned by Trans Ocean Distribution Limited
- Other trademarks owned by Trans Ocean Distribution Limited
- Other trademarks owned by Trans Ocean Distribution Limited
- Other trademarks owned by TRANS OCEAN BULK LOGISTICS LIMITED
- Other trademarks in Class 020
- Other trademarks in Class 039
- Similar marks named RHINOBULK
- Recently changed USPTO trademarks
- Recently filed trademarks
- Browse all trademark records
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sep 14, 2018 | FINV | FINAL DECISION TRANSACTION PROCESSED BY IB | — |
| Dec 8, 2017 | DENC | NOTIFICATION OF EFFECT OF CANCELLATION OF INTL REG MAILED | — |
| Dec 8, 2017 | DETH | DEATH OF INTERNATIONAL REGISTRATION | — |
| Nov 24, 2017 | RFNT | REFUSAL PROCESSED BY IB | — |
| May 26, 2017 | INNT | TOTAL INVALIDATION PROCESSED BY THE IB | — |
| May 26, 2017 | NREP | NEW REPRESENTATIVE AT IB RECEIVED | — |
| Apr 10, 2017 | INTS | TOTAL INVALIDATION OF REG EXT PROTECTION SENT TO IB | — |
| Apr 10, 2017 | INPC | INVALIDATION PROCESSED | — |
| Jan 13, 2017 | INTR | TOTAL INVALIDATION OF REG EXT PROTECTION CREATED | — |
| May 13, 2016 | C71T | CANCELLED SECTION 71 | — |
| Jan 27, 2013 | FINO | FINAL DECISION TRANSACTION PROCESSED BY IB | — |
| Jun 3, 2010 | CHLD | CHANGE OF OWNER RECEIVED FROM IB | — |
| Feb 9, 2010 | FICS | FINAL DISPOSITION NOTICE SENT TO IB | — |
| Feb 9, 2010 | FIMP | FINAL DISPOSITION PROCESSED | — |
| Jan 6, 2010 | FICR | FINAL DISPOSITION NOTICE CREATED, TO BE SENT TO IB | — |
| Oct 6, 2009 | R.PR | REGISTERED-PRINCIPAL REGISTER | Your trademark is registered on the Principal Register — the strongest form of federal trademark protection. You may use the ® symbol for the covered goods and services. Maintenance filings (Section 8 and renewals) are required to keep the registration alive. |
| Jul 21, 2009 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| Jul 1, 2009 | NPUB | NOTICE OF PUBLICATION | — |
| Jun 17, 2009 | PREV | LAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED | — |
| Jun 11, 2009 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Jun 10, 2009 | RCCK | SUSPENSION CHECKED - TO ATTORNEY FOR ACTION | — |
| Jan 15, 2009 | OPNX | NOTIFICATION OF POSSIBLE OPPOSITION - PROCESSED BY IB | — |
| Dec 25, 2008 | OPNS | NOTIFICATION OF POSSIBLE OPPOSITION SENT TO IB | — |
| Dec 25, 2008 | OPNR | NOTIFICATION OF POSSIBLE OPPOSITION CREATED, TO BE SENT TO IB | — |
| Dec 10, 2008 | RCSC | REPORT COMPLETED SUSPENSION CHECK CASE STILL SUSPENDED | — |
| Dec 10, 2008 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| Jun 10, 2008 | CNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| Jun 10, 2008 | CNSL | SUSPENSION LETTER WRITTEN | — |
| Jun 10, 2008 | ACEC | AMENDMENT FROM APPLICANT ENTERED | — |
| Jun 10, 2008 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Jun 9, 2008 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| Jun 6, 2008 | PGRR | PETITION GRANTED - RESPONSE RECEIVED | — |
| May 6, 2008 | PETR | PETITION TO REVIVE-RECEIVED | — |
| May 6, 2008 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Mar 18, 2008 | MAB2 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - FAILURE TO RESPOND | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Mar 18, 2008 | ABN2 | ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSE | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Oct 5, 2007 | RFNT | REFUSAL PROCESSED BY IB | — |
| Sep 12, 2007 | RFCS | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED - REFUSAL SENT TO IB | — |
| Sep 11, 2007 | RFRR | REFUSAL PROCESSED BY MPU | — |
| Sep 11, 2007 | RFCR | NON-FINAL ACTION (IB REFUSAL) PREPARED FOR REVIEW | — |
| Sep 10, 2007 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Aug 31, 2007 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Jul 20, 2007 | NWAP | NEW APPLICATION ENTERED | — |
| Jul 19, 2007 | REPR | SN ASSIGNED FOR SECT 66A APPL FROM IB | — |